Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, not recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07798999

Anodic Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease

Randomized, double-blind, crossover design, interventional study to assess the differences between mixed cathodic/anodic, pure cathodic, and pure anodic stimulation with respect to efficacy, side effect thresholds, symptom control, and quality of life in Parkinson's Disease patients implanted with Boston Scientific Cartesia directional DBS leads in the bilateral STN.

Active, not recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

USF Health STC Department of Neurosurgery and Tampa General Hospital

Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States

About this study

Prior studies and literature have suggested that directional leads might enable the use of complex bipolar configurations to activate neurons within a target and avoid side effects based on knowledge of local fiber tracts. The Boston Scientific Vercise system offers a unique opportunity to test this hypothesis. The Cartesia lead is a directional lead with 4 levels of contact, the middle 2 which are segmented, while the Vercise Genus generators utilize multiple independent current sources connected to each contact. This combination enables complex, highly customizable stimulation configurations, which can be incrementally adjusted in real time, without recourse to shutting the device off between parameter changes. This study proposes to utilize this technology to compare pure cathodic, pure anodic, and mixed cathodic/anodic stimulation in patients with Parkinson's Disease implanted with STN-DBS leads. The primary objective is to assess the differences between mixed cathodic/anodic, pure cathodic, and pure anodic stimulation with respect to efficacy, side effect thresholds, minimum current amplitude that activates side effects inducing the pyramidal tract, symptom control, and quality of life in Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients implanted with Boston Scientific Cartesia directional DBS leads in the bilateral STN.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients that are between the ages of 40-80 years of age.
  • Patients diagnosed with Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease that are treated with bilateral STN DBS Boston Scientific Vercise Cartesia directional leads for at least 3 months.
  • Patients whose DBS settings can be optimized to include anodic and cathodic stimulation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Parkinson's Disease patients implanted with DBS leads outside of FDA labeling.
  • Patients who are not chronically using anodic stimulation parameters.

Treatment and study plan

Mixed Cathodic/Anodic

Device

Mixed cathodic/anodic stimulation setting on the Boston Scientific Vercise DBS system.

Pure Cathodic

Device

Pure cathodic stimulation setting on the Boston Scientific Vercise DBS system.

Pure Anodic

Device

Pure anodic stimulation setting on the Boston Scientific Vercise DBS system.

Primary outcomes

  1. Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)

    Time frame: At the end of patient's participation in the study, 3 months.

    Patient's preferred stimulation parameter setting (with or without anodic stimulation) determined by their responses to the questionnaire and patient's stated preference. The score ranges from 0-100, with lower scores reflecting better quality of life of patients.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after each parameter setting.

    Change in UPDRS part III motor scores obtained ON stimulation/OFF medications at 4 weeks on each parameter setting relative to UPDRS part III motor scores obtained OFF stimulation/OFF medications at baseline. Scores range from 0-132. 0 indicates no motor impairment, 32 or below is considered mild impairment, and a score of 59 and above indicates severe impairment.

  2. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Sub-scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after each parameter setting.

    Change in UPDRS part III motor sub-scores (tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, postural stability/gait) obtained ON stimulation/OFF medications at 4 weeks on each parameter setting relative to UPDRS part III motor scores obtained OFF stimulation/OFF medications at baseline. 8 sub-scores for each section of the scale. Each sub-section is scored from 0-4, or a score of 8 if "untestable". A score of 0 in each sub-section or a lower score normal or absence of symptom.

  3. Clinical Global Impression- Positive Symptoms (CGI-P) Scores Mixed Cathodic/Anodic

    Time frame: 4 weeks following mixed cathodic/anodic stimulation.

    CGI-P at 4 weeks following mixed cathodic/anodic stimulation. The scale uses a 7-point severity scale with 1 indicating normal or no positive symptoms and 7 indicating most severely ill patients with positive symptoms. Each item is rated independently on the 7-point scale.

  4. Clinical Global Impression- Positive Symptoms (CGI-P) Scores Pure Cathodic

    Time frame: 4 weeks following pure cathodic stimulation.

    CGI-P scores at 4 weeks following pure cathodic stimulation. The scale uses a 7-point severity scale with 1 indicating normal or no positive symptoms and 7 indicating most severely ill patients with positive symptoms. Each item is rated independently on the 7-point scale.

  5. Clinical Global Impression- Positive Symptoms (CGI-P) Scores Pure Anodic

    Time frame: 4 weeks following pure anodic stimulation.

    CGI-P scores at 4 weeks following pure anodic stimulation. The scale uses a 7-point severity scale with 1 indicating normal or no positive symptoms and 7 indicating most severely ill patients with positive symptoms. Each item is rated independently on the 7-point scale.

  6. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Scores Mixed Cathodic/Anodic

    Time frame: 4 weeks following mixed cathodic/anodic stimulation.

    PGI-C scores at 4 weeks following mixed cathodic/anodic stimulation. The scale uses a 7-point Likert scale for scoring. Scores of 1 and 2 indicate significant improvement, score of 4 indicates no change in patient's status, and scores of 5 or higher indicate worsening or deteriorating changes in patient.

  7. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Scores Pure Cathodic

    Time frame: 4 weeks following pure cathodic stimulation.

    PGI-C scores at 4 weeks following pure cathodic stimulation. The scale uses a 7-point Likert scale for scoring. Scores of 1 and 2 indicate significant improvement, score of 4 indicates no change in patient's status, and scores of 5 or higher indicate worsening or deteriorating changes in patient.

  8. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Scores Pure Anodic

    Time frame: 4 weeks following pure anodic stimulation.

    PGI-C scores at 4 weeks following pure anodic stimulation. The scale uses a 7-point Likert scale for scoring. Scores of 1 and 2 indicate significant improvement, score of 4 indicates no change in patient's status, and scores of 5 or higher indicate worsening or deteriorating changes in patient.

  9. Threshold for Clinical Benefit During Deep Brain Stimulation Programming

    Time frame: Throughout the patient's participation in the study, 3 months.

    Minimum stimulation amplitude required to achieve a predefined clinical benefit at each stimulation parameter setting, including mixed cathodic/anodic stimulation, pure cathodic stimulation, and pure anodic stimulation. Clinical benefit will be determined based on investigator assessment of motor symptom improvement during stimulation programming. The unit of measure is "Stimulation amplitude (mA)".

  10. Threshold for Stimulation-Related Adverse Effects During Deep Brain Stimulation Programming

    Time frame: Throughout the patient's participation in the study, 3 months.

    Minimum stimulation amplitude at which a stimulation-related adverse effect is first observed or reported during programming at each stimulation parameter setting, including mixed cathodic/anodic stimulation, pure cathodic stimulation, and pure anodic stimulation. Adverse effects will be identified through participant report and investigator assessment during systematic amplitude titration. Unit of Measure: "Stimulation amplitude (mA)".

  11. Model of the Volume of Tissue Activated (VTA)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after each parameter setting.

    Model of the VTA resulting from each stimulation parameter setting compared with respect to the regional anatomy as derived from patient-specific segmentation of pre-operative MRI and post-operative/post-enrollment CT studies. Relative location, extent, and spread out of the boundaries of the Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) of VTAs obtained with all stimulation parameter settings.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of South Florida

Other

Collaborators

  • Boston Scientific Corporation

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Crossover Trial of Chronic Anodic Versus Cathodic Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 2, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.