Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07798310

Protocol for Rapid Onset of Mobilization in Patients With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury III (PROMPT-SCI III) Trial

This longitudinal cohort study will investigate the clinical benefits of early acute exercise therapy after mild spinal cord injury (SCI). We hypothesize that early acute exercise therapy after mild SCI will improve neurofunctional recovery (walking, functional independence, motor and sensory recovery) and quality of life one year after the SCI, while decreasing complications during acute care and reducing the care burden (shorter hospital stay and home discharge more likely). For this study, 107 participants with mild SCI will be recruited. Participants will perform daily 30-minute sessions of seated cycling throughout acute care, starting within 2 days of their surgery to decompress the spinal cord. Neurofunctional recovery, quality of life, acute complications and care burden for the participants performing early acute cycling will be compared to a control cohort of patients with mild SCI who did not receive exercise therapy during acute care.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, h4j1c5, Canada

Location contact

Andreane Richard-Denis, MD, MSc

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong, MD, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lara Chawa

CONTACT

[email protected]

1+514-338-2222

About this study

GOALS: This longitudinal cohort study will investigate the clinical benefits of early acute exercise therapy after mild spinal cord injury (SCI).

Primary hypothesis: Recovering independent walking 1 year after a mild SCI is more likely with early acute exercise therapy, in comparison with a historical cohort not exposed to early acute exercise therapy. We have determined that an increase in the percentage of individuals recovering independent walking in the community from 35% to 55% would be considered as a clinically meaningful increase.

Secondary hypothesis: Acute complications, neurological recovery, functional independence, quality of life and care pathway are improved with early acute exercise therapy.

METHODS: For this 5-year study, 107 participants with mild acute traumatic SCI will be recruited. Participants will perform daily 30-minute sessions of seated cycling throughout acute care, starting within 2 days of their surgery to decompress the spinal cord. The immediate response to cycling will be monitored from physiological (hemodynamic and respiratory) and electrophysiological (electromyography and H-reflex testing in lower extremities) assessments. Independent walking in the community (primary outcome) is defined by the ability to walk 100 meters outdoors without technical aids or only with leg orthosis. Secondary outcomes include all complications occurring during acute care (particularly early spasticity, pneumonia, urinary tract infection and pressure injury) and the care pathway (discharge destination and length of stay), as well as neurological recovery, functional independence and quality of life 1 year after the SCI. Outcomes will be compared to a control cohort of patients with mild SCI who did not receive exercise therapy during acute care, and the association with electrophysiological measures will be assessed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adults 18 years or older with non-penetrating traumatic SCI
  • SCI severity AIS grade D (motor function preserved with most key muscles able to move against gravity)
  • NLI between C0 and L2; and spine surgery performed within 48 hours of SCI

Exclusion criteria

  • intubated and mechanically ventilated
  • conditions interfering with patient safety or ability to undergo cycling
  • body mass index 40 kg/m2 or less (to prevent "frog leg" position during cycling)
  • moderate or severe traumatic brain injury
  • hemodynamic instability
  • pelvic or lower extremity
  • injury with weight-bearing or mobilization restrictions

Treatment and study plan

Cycling

Device

Seated cycling using motorized under desk exerciser

Primary outcomes

  1. Score from Item 14 of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure ranging from 0 to 8

    Time frame: 1 year

    Ambulation in the community

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complications

    Time frame: perioperatively/periprocedurally

    Acute complications including pneumonia, urinary tract infection, pressure injury, spasticity, etc.

  2. Presence or absence of an improvement by one American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade from baseline to 1 year

    Time frame: 1 year

    Difference in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade between baseline and 1 year

  3. Total score of Spinal Cord Independence Measure ranging from 0 to 100

    Time frame: 1 year

    Functional independence

  4. Frequence of spasms from Penn Spasm Frequency Scale ranging from 0 to 4

    Time frame: 1 year

    Severity of spasticity

  5. Presence or absence of neuropathic pain

    Time frame: 1 year

    International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set

  6. Physical component score from Short-form 36 ranging from 0 to 100

    Time frame: 1 year

    Physical component of Health-related quality of life

  7. Mental component score from Short-form 36 ranging from 0 to 100

    Time frame: 1 year

    Mental component of Health-related quality of life

  8. Presence or absence of improvement in motor score by 5 points from baseline to 1 year

    Time frame: 1 year

    Difference in motor score from baseline to 1 year

  9. Presence or absence of improvement in sensory scores by 10 points from baseline to 1 year

    Time frame: 1 year

    Difference in sensory scores between baseline and 1 year

  10. Presence or absence of improvement by 2 neurological levels of injury from baseline to 1 year

    Time frame: 1 year

    Difference in neurological level of injury between baseline and 1 year

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Andreane Richard-Denis Richard-Denis, MD, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

1+514-338-2222

Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

1+514-338-2222

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de l'ile de Montreal

Other

Registry information

Acronym: PROMPT-SCI III

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2031
Study completion
2031
First posted
Sep 1, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.