Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07797517

Microneedling With Glycolic Acid or Trichloroacetic Acid for Atrophic Acne Scars

Atrophic acne scars are depressed scars that can remain after acne has healed. Microneedling is a procedure that uses very small needles to create controlled micro-injuries in the skin, which may stimulate collagen production and improve scar appearance. Chemical peels, including glycolic acid and trichloroacetic acid, may also improve acne scars.

This study compares three approaches for treating atrophic acne scars: microneedling followed by a 35% glycolic acid peel, microneedling followed by a 15% trichloroacetic acid peel, and microneedling alone. Sixty adults with atrophic acne scars are randomly assigned to one of the three groups.

Participants receive a series of microneedling treatments at 2-week intervals. The study evaluates changes in scar severity, participant satisfaction, treatment-related pain, recovery time after treatment, and side effects. The findings may help identify whether adding either chemical peel to microneedling provides greater benefit than microneedling alone and whether one combination has a shorter recovery time or fewer side effects.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University

Kafr ash Shaykh, Egypt

About this study

Atrophic acne scars are a common long-term consequence of acne vulgaris. They may appear as ice-pick, boxcar, or rolling scars and can affect facial appearance and quality of life. Available treatments include microneedling, chemical peeling, laser procedures, dermabrasion, subcision, and other scar-directed interventions. The choice of treatment may depend on scar morphology, skin type, recovery time, cost, and risk of adverse effects.

Microneedling creates controlled microchannels in the skin and may promote dermal remodeling through wound-healing mechanisms, including fibroblast activation and new collagen formation. Glycolic acid is a superficial chemical peeling agent that promotes epidermal exfoliation and remodeling. Trichloroacetic acid produces controlled protein coagulation and a wound-healing response. Combining microneedling with chemical peeling may provide complementary effects on atrophic acne scars.

This single-center randomized controlled study was conducted in the Dermatology and Venereology Department at Kafrelsheikh University Hospitals. A total of 60 adults with atrophic acne scars were allocated equally to one of three groups: microneedling followed by 35% glycolic acid peeling, microneedling followed by 15% trichloroacetic acid peeling, or microneedling alone.

Microneedling was performed with a Dermapen device after topical anesthetic application and skin cleansing. In the glycolic acid group, a 35% glycolic acid peel was applied immediately after microneedling and neutralized according to the clinical endpoint and participant tolerance. In the trichloroacetic acid group, a 15% trichloroacetic acid peel was applied immediately after microneedling until an appropriate frosting endpoint was observed. The microneedling-alone group received no chemical peel. Participants received post-procedure instructions that included sun avoidance, sunscreen use, moisturizer as needed, and topical antibiotic use for 3 days.

Standardized facial photographs were obtained before and after treatment and during follow-up. Two dermatologists who were blinded to treatment allocation assessed clinical response by comparing standardized photographs. The study also collected participant-reported satisfaction, procedure-related pain, post-procedure downtime, and treatment-related adverse effects, including prolonged erythema and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation.

The study evaluates whether microneedling combined with either 35% glycolic acid or 15% trichloroacetic acid can improve atrophic acne-scar severity more than microneedling alone. It also compares the two combination approaches with respect to treatment tolerance, recovery time, participant satisfaction, and safety.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults of either sex aged 18 years or older.
  • Presence of atrophic acne scars of any type or duration.
  • Fitzpatrick skin type I to IV.

Exclusion criteria

  • Active inflammatory acne lesions, skin infection, or a tendency to develop keloids.
  • Immunocompromised state, facial cancer, or severely damaged facial skin.
  • Known hypersensitivity to glycolic acid or trichloroacetic acid.
  • Oral isotretinoin use within 6 months before enrollment.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Inability or unwillingness to adhere to study procedures.
  • Unrealistic expectations regarding treatment outcomes.

Treatment and study plan

Microneedling only

Procedure

Microneedling of facial atrophic acne scars was performed using a Dermapen device after topical anesthetic application and skin cleansing. The needle penetration depth was 1.5 mm. Microneedling was performed at 2-week intervals according to the study treatment schedule.

Microneedling with Glycolic Acid 35% Peel

Procedure

A 35% glycolic acid peel was applied immediately after microneedling to the acne-scar areas using a cotton-tipped applicator. The peel was neutralized after approximately 3 to 5 minutes, or earlier if frosting, burning, or irritation occurred.

Microneedling with Trichloroacetic Acid 15% Peel

Procedure

A 15% trichloroacetic acid peel was applied immediately after microneedling to the acne-scar areas using a cotton-tipped applicator until an even white frosting endpoint was observed. Post-peel care included washing the skin with sterile saline.

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Improvement in Atrophic Acne Scar Severity Using the Goodman and Baron Qualitative Global Acne Scar Grading System

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 month after the last treatment session

    Clinical response is assessed by comparing standardized facial photographs obtained at baseline and 1 month after the last treatment session. Two dermatologists blinded to treatment allocation evaluate scar severity using the Goodman and Baron qualitative global acne scar grading system. Excellent response is defined as a reduction of two scar grades, good response as a reduction of one scar grade, and poor response as no reduction in scar grade.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participant Satisfaction With Treatment

    Time frame: 1 month after the last treatment session

    Participant satisfaction is assessed 1 month after the last treatment session and categorized as not satisfied, satisfied, or markedly satisfied.

  2. Treatment-Related Adverse Effects

    Time frame: At each treatment session through 1 month after the last treatment session

    Treatment-related adverse effects are assessed at each treatment session and follow-up. Recorded adverse effects include prolonged erythema or irritation, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation, herpes simplex flare-up, scarring, and keloid formation.

  3. Procedure-Related Pain Severity

    Time frame: Immediately after each treatment session within up to 30 minutes

    Participants rate pain experienced after each treatment session. Pain severity is categorized as mild, moderate, or severe.

  4. Post-Procedure Downtime

    Time frame: After each treatment session up to 2 weeks

    Post-procedure downtime is recorded as the number of days required for recovery after each treatment session.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kafrelsheikh University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Which Is More Effective: Microneedling With 35% Glycolic Acid Peeling or Microneedling With 15% Trichloroacetic Acid Peeling in the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scars? A Randomized Controlled Study

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 1, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.