Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07793422

Study to Evaluate Change in Disease Activity and Adverse Events of Subcutaneous Etentamig Compared With Daratumumab Plus Cyclophosphamide Plus Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in Adults With Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease caused by abnormal plasma cells producing misfolded light chain proteins that deposit in organs, leading to organ dysfunction and failure. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etentamig compared to daratumumab plus cyclophosphamide plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in participants with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis.

Etentamig is an investigational drug being developed for the treatment of newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. This is an open-label study. The study consists of 2 parts: a Safety Run-in where participatns will receive etentamig, and a Randomized Portion with 2 treatment arms where participants will receive etentamig, or Dara-CyBorD. Approximately 370 participants will be enrolled in the study at approximately 130 sites worldwide.

Participants will receive injected etentamig, in the Safety Run-in. Participants will receive injected etentamig, or Dara-CyBorD per the local label, in the Randomized Portion of the study. The total study duration is approximately 96 months.

There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care due to study procedures. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effects of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histopathological diagnosis of amyloidosis based on detection by immunohistochemistry and polarizing light microscopy of green bi-refringent material in congo red-stained tissue specimens (in an organ other than bone marrow) or characteristic electron microscopy appearance.
  • Evidence of a monoclonal plasma cell proliferative disorder (serum or urine monoclonal protein, abnormal free light-chain ratio, or clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow).
  • Measurable disease of amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis as defined by difference in free light chains (dFLC) >= 50 mg/L
  • No history of treatment with anti-amyloidosis therapy.
  • Presence of an amyloid-related systemic syndrome with at least 1 organ impacted by AL amyloidosis according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria.
  • Considered AL amyloidosis cardiac risk stage 1, 2, or 3a (or 3b [randomized portion only]).
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <= 2.

Exclusion criteria

  • Known allergic reaction, significant sensitivity, or intolerance to constituents of the study treatments.
  • Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection.
  • History of other active malignancies within the past 3 years (with specified exceptions).

Treatment and study plan

Etentamig

Drug

Injection

Daratumumab

Drug

Injection

Cyclophosphamide

Drug

Oral

bortezomib

Drug

Injection

Dexamethasone

Drug

Oral

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 96 Months

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. Safety and tolerability assessed through adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, and other safety assessments.

  2. Randomized Portion: Complete Hematologic Response (HemeCR) Rate

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    HemeCR rate is defined as the proportion of subjects with the best overall response of hemeCR as determined by International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria (IACC) and assessed by the independent review committee (IRC)

  3. Randomized Portion: Major Organ Deterioration Progression-Free Survival (MOD-PFS)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    MOD-PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of MOD-PFS event or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. MOD-PFS includes: Development of hematologic progressive disease per consensus guidelines or high-risk difference in free light chain (dFLC) progression; Clinical manifestation of cardiac failure (defined as need for cardiac transplant, left ventricular assist device, or intra-aortic balloon pump); Clinical manifestation of renal failure (defined as development of end-stage renal disease needing hemodialysis or renal transplant); Death. MOD-PFS will be assessed by an Independent Review Committee.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety Run-In: Major Organ Deterioration Progression-Free Survival (MOD-PFS)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    MOD-PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of MOD-PFS event or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. MOD-PFS includes: Development of hematologic progressive disease per consensus guidelines or high-risk difference in free light chain (dFLC) progression; Clinical manifestation of cardiac failure (defined as need for cardiac transplant, left ventricular assist device, or intra-aortic balloon pump); Clinical manifestation of renal failure (defined as development of end-stage renal disease needing hemodialysis or renal transplant); Death.

  2. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Overall survival defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.

  3. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Percentage of participants achieving hematologic very good partial response or better based on International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria.

  4. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Cardiac Response Rate

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Percentage of participants achieving cardiac response as assessed per graded criteria.

  5. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Renal Response Rate

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Percentage of participants achieving renal response as assessed per the International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria (IACC) criteria.

  6. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Liver Response Rate

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Percentage of participants achieving liver response as assessed per the International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria (IACC) criteria.

  7. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Next Treatment

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Time from randomization to initiation of next anti-AL amyloidosis treatment.

  8. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Complete Hematologic Response

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Time from randomization to first documentation of complete hematologic response (hemeCR) as determined by International Amyloidosis Criteria Committee.

  9. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Complete Hematologic Response

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Duration of complete hematologic response (hemeCR) defined as the time from first documentation of hemeCR to the date of loss of hemeCR.

  10. Randomized Portion: Time to Cardiac Response

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Time from randomization to first achievement of cardiac response.

  11. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Renal Response

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Time from randomization to first achievement of renal response.

  12. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Liver Response

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Time from randomization to first achievement of liver response.

  13. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Cardiac Response

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Time from first achievement of cardiac response to cardiac progression.

  14. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Renal Progression

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Time from first achievement of renal response to renal progression.

  15. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Liver Response

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Time from first achievement of liver response to liver progression.

  16. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Cardiac Progression

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Time from randomization to first occurrence of cardiac progression.

  17. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Renal Progression

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Time from randomization to first occurrence of renal progression.

  18. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Liver Progression

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Time from randomization to first occurrence of liver progression.

  19. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Etentamig

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Cmax of etentamig.

  20. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Etentamig

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Tmax of etentamig.

  21. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Etentamig

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    AUC of etentamig.

  22. Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    Immunogenicity assessed through summary of antidrug antibody (ADA) status, ADA titers, and neutralizing antidrug antibodies (NAbs), if NAbs samples are analyzed.

  23. Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Physical Functioning as Measured by 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2) Physical Component Summary Score

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    The SF-36 v2 is a 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life across eight domains. Higher scores indicate better health status.

  24. Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Mental Functioning as Measured by SF-36 v2 Mental Component Summary Score

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    The SF-36 v2 is a 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life across eight domains. Higher scores indicate better health status.

  25. Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Scale Score

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire assessing cancer-specific quality of life. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.

  26. Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Fatigue as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale Score

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire assessing cancer-specific quality of life. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.

  27. Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Disease Symptoms as Measured by Additional EORTC Questionnaire Symptom Scales/Items

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months

    The EORTC questionnaires assess cancer-specific symptoms and quality of life.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

ABBVIE CALL CENTER

CONTACT

[email protected]

844-663-3742

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AbbVie

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Etentamig (ABBV-383) Compared to Daratumumab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2034
Study completion
2034
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.