TENNacity Trial: A Pilot Test of Intersectional CBT Among Young Southern Black and Latino/x GBQ+ Men

The CES-D is a 20-item measure that assesses frequency of past-week depression symptoms (e.g., "I was bothered by things that usually don't bother me") on a 4-point scale from 0 (rarely or none of the time [less than 1 day]) to 3 (most or all of the time [5-7 days]). The item scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater risk for clinical depression. Total score range 0-80.

ODSIS is a 5-item self-report scale that asks participants to rate the severity and impairment associated with past-week symptoms of depression (e.g., "In the past week, when you have felt depressed, how intense or severe was your depression?") from 0 (little or none: Depression was absent or barely noticeable.) to 4 (extreme: Depression was overwhelming.). The item scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater severity and impairment. Total score range 0-20.

OASIS is a 5-item self-report scale that asks participants to rate the severity and impairment associated with past-week anxiety symptoms (e.g., "In the past week, when you have felt anxious, how intense or severe was your anxiety?") from 0 (little or none: Anxiety was absent or barely noticeable.) to 4 (extreme: Anxiety was overwhelming. It was impossible to relax at all. Physical symptoms were unbearable). The item scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater severity and impairment. Total score range 0-20.

The 18-item BSI provides a mean score across depression, anxiety, and somatization subscales, and assesses psychological distress (e.g., "feeling nervousness or shakiness inside") on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The item scores are summed with higher scores indicating greater severity and impairment. Total score range 0-72.

SIDAS is a 5-item self-report scale that assesses past-month frequency and controllability of suicidal thoughts, how close one has come to making an attempt, and distress and impairment associated with thoughts of suicide (e.g., "In the past month, how often have you had thoughts about suicide?"). Responses range from 0 (never or not at all) to 10 (always or extremely). The item scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater severity of suicidal ideation. Total score range 0-50.

SIP-AD is a 15-item scale in which the sum of "yes" responses indicates participants' past-3-month consequences of alcohol and drug use (e.g., "I have failed to do what is expected of me because of my drinking/drug use?). The item scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater problems related to drugs and alcohol. Total score range 0-15.

Mean Number of Recent HIV-risk Acts self reported using the timeline follow-back method

The number of the mental health variables that change in the expected direction. The eight psychological health variables include: depressive symptoms; anxiety; social anxiety; suicidal ideation; psychological distress; substance use problems; rumination; and assertiveness.

The number of sexual health variables that change in the expected direction. The four sexual health variables include: Recent HIV transmission risk acts; condom use self-efficacy; sexual compulsivity; and recent PrEP use.

A 20-item self-report scale that assesses fear, distress, and anxiety a person feels during general social interactions. Responses range from 0 (Not at all characteristic of me) to 4 (Extremely characteristic of me). The item scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater level of social anxiety. Total score range 0-80.

The Brooding Subscale is a 5-item measure that assesses maladaptive cognitive patterns when feeling down, sad, or depressed (e.g., "Think 'why do I always react this way?'") on a 4-point scale from 1 (Almost Never) to 4 (Almost Always). The item scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater ruminative brooding. Total score range 0-4.

The Rathus Assertiveness Schedule is a 30-item measure that assesses assertiveness and passivity (e.g., "I often have a hard time saying 'No.'") on a 6-point scale from +3 (very characteristic of me) to -3 (very uncharacteristic of me). The item scores are summed, with positive scores indicating higher assertiveness and negative scores indicating lower assertiveness or passivity. Total score range 90 to -90.

The AUDIT assesses past-3-month alcohol and related problems across 10 items (e.g., "How often did you have a drink containing alcohol?") with varying numeric response options (0-4). The item scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater alcohol-related risk. Total score range 0-40.

Condom use self-efficacy will be measured by calculating mean scores on the Safer Sex Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. The Safer Sex Self-Efficacy Questionnaire is a 13-item measure that assesses confidence in avoiding having anal sex without a condom in different situations (e.g., "When you are with someone who is really hot?") on a 5-point scale from 1 (Not at all confident) to 5 (Extremely confident). The item scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater condom use self-efficacy. Total score range 1-13.

The Sexual Compulsivity Scale is a 10-item measure that assesses difficulties regulating sexual desire (e.g., "I think about sex more than I would like to") on a 4-point scale from 1 (Not at all lke me) to 4 (Very much like m). The item scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater Sexual Compulsivity. Total score range 10-40.

Recent PrEP use will be measured by calculating proportions of participants who reported any PrEP use over the past 3 months. Three types of PrEP were described before participants were asked, "Which methods of PrEP (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis) administration have you used to reduce the risk of getting HIV over the past 3 months? Select all that apply." Answer options included Daily PrEP (i.e., 4-7 days a week), On-demand PrEP (i.e., the "2-1-1" schedule), Injectable PrEP (i.e., every two months), and I have not taken PrEP in any form over the past three months.

Number of protective strategies that increased and risk-enhancing strategies that decreased.

Coping response will be scored on a 5-point adaptiveness scale (created for this study) ranging from 1 (Definitely adaptive [or almost certainly so]) to 5 (Definitely maladaptive [or almost certainly so]) with higher scores indicating worse coping. Total score range 1-5.

The Internalized Homophobia Scale is a 9-item measure that assesses internalized homophobia on a 4-point scale from 1 (Never) to 4 (Often). The item scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater internalized homophobia. Total score range 9-36.

The Gay-Related Rejection Sensitivity Scale is a 14-item measure that the likelihood of expecting rejection by heterosexuals in more or less ambiguous situations with answers on a scale ranging from 1 to 6 with higher scores indicating greater rejection. Total score range 1-6.

The OI is an 11-item scale designed to assess the degree to which lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer individuals are open about their sexual orientation. Responses on OI items indicate the degree to which the respondent's sexual orientation is known by and openly discussed with various types of individuals on a 7-point scale from 1 (person definitely does NOT know about your sexual orientation status) to 7 (person definitely knows about your sexual orientation status, and it is OPENLY talked about); if the person of group is not relevant to them, participants select 0 (not applicable to your situation; there is no such person or group of people in your life). The item scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater sexual orientation disclosure. Total score range 0-4.

This version of the Self-Concealment Scale is a 6-item measure that assesses sexual ), a brief self-report measure assessing effort to conceal one's sexual identity in one's current life (e.g., "In the last 2 weeks, I have altered my appearance, mannerisms, or activities in an attempt to 'pass' as straight.") on a 5-point scale from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (All the time). The item scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater concealment. Total score range 1-5.

Internalized racism will be measured as mean of participant scores on a 5-item measure that assesses negative thoughts and beliefs about one's own racial minority status. Participants were presented with a question regarding their racial/ethnic identity (e.g., "How do you feel today about being a person of your racial/ethnic background?"), which they answer by completing five semantic differential scales, each ranging from 1 (a negative characteristic) to 5 (a corresponding positive characteristic): uncomfortable to comfortable, dissatisfied to satisfied, ashamed to proud, strong to weak, and self-accepting to self-rejecting. The item scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater internalized racism. Total score range 5-25.

The scale is a 7-item measure includes four items that assess (a) racial/ethnic vigilance (e.g., "try to prepare for possible insults from other people before leaving home") on a 4-point scale from 0 (Rarely) to 3 (Almost every day), total score range 0-3.and (b) race-related sleep disturbance over the past four weeks (e.g., waking very early with trouble getting back to sleep) on a 5-point scale from 1 (At least once a week) to 5 (Never), total score range 1-5. The item scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater race-related vigilance.

The Anticipatory Race-Related Stress Subscale is a 4-item measure that assesses race-related anticipatory stress on a 7-point scale from 1 (Not at all stressful) to 7 (Extremely Stressful). The item scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater race-related anticipatory stress. Total score range 1-7.

This is a 6-item subscale measure that assesses perceived heterosexism within one's racial/ethnic community on a 7-point scale from 0 (Not applicable) to 6 (Always). Then, participants are presented with directions reading, "Imagining if you were to experience ongoing anti-LGBTQ stigma within your racial/ethnic community, such as:" and all six subscale items were presented. They are then asked, "If you were to encounter situations like these..." before encountering three follow-up questions to assess distress (e.g., "to what extent would the situation stress or bother you?"). The initial subscale score is multiplied by the stress score to compute stress related to heterosexism in one's racial/ethnic community, with higher scores indicating greater intracommunity heterosexism. Total score range 0-30.

This is a 6-item subscale measure that assesses perceived racism in the White LGBTQ+ community (e.g., "I have felt misunderstood by White LGBTQ+ people because I am a POC.") on a 5-point scale from 1 (To a little extent) to 5 (To a great extent). Then, participants are presented with directions reading, "Imagining if you were to experience ongoing racism within the LGBTQ+ community, such as:" and all six subscale items were presented. They are then asked, "If you were to encounter situations like these..." before encountering three follow-up questions to assess distress (e.g., "to what extent would the situation stress or bother you?"). The initial subscale score is multiplied by the stress score to compute stress related to heterosexism in one's racial/ethnic community, with higher scores indicating greater intracommunity heterosexism. Total score range 0-30.

The Conflicts in Allegiances Scale is a 6-item subscale measure that assesses conflicts between the racial/ethnic and sexual orientation identities they endorsed previously within the survey (e.g., "I separate my [insert sexual orientation] and [insert racial/ethnic group] identities.") on a 7-point scale from 1 (Disagree strongly) to 7 (Agree strongly). The item scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater identity conflict. Total score range 1-7.

This is a 12-item measure that assesses identity affirmation among LGBTQ+ people of color on a 7-point scale from 1 (Very strongly disagree) to 7 (Very strongly agree). The item scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater Southern LGBTQ-POC identity strength. Total score range 1-7.

This is a 20-item subscale measure that assesses the ways oppression has shaped their individuals and community QT-BIPOC resilience on a 7-point scale from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree). The item scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater intersectional stigma resilience. Total score range 1-7.

Number of the mental health variables that change in the expected direction out of the 13 psychological health variables.

The Perseverative Cognition Subscale Subscale is a 5-item measure that assesses race-related rumination on a 7-point scale from 1 (Not at all stressful) to 7 (Extremely stressful). The item scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater race-related anticipatory stress. Total score range 1-7.