Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07792642

FITME Study: Formulating Individualised Exercise Prescription in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

This randomised controlled trial aims to: i) compare the power output at the first metabolic threshold (WMT1) between the MT1 and the six-minute walking test (6MWT)-based cardiorespiratory exercise prescriptions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); ii) compare exercise adherence, peripheral muscle strength, health-related quality of life, dyspnoea, fatigue, disease impact and emotional status between MT1 and 6MWT-based exercise prescriptions.

Patients will be recruited via the pulmonology services from Unidade Local de Saúde do Baixo Mondego and Unidade Local de Saúde de Aveiro.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive and impactful disease characterised by chronic ariflow. Beyond its primary respiratory symptoms (i.e. dyspnoea, sputum production, cough, and frequent exacerbations), COPD is often accompanied by systemic, extrapulmonary manifestations such as skeletal muscle dysfunction.

Exercise is a structured, purposeful subset of physical activity designed to improve or maintain one or more components of physical fitness and health benefits. Within the management of COPD, conventionally delivered through pulmonary rehabilitation programme, exercise training triggers crucial extrapulmonary adaptations. By improving peripheral muscle function and cardiovascular efficiency, it reduces the overall load on the pulmonary system, ultimately improving symptoms, preventing hospitalizations, and halting clinical deterioration. To achieve these adaptations, a minimum threshold of external load (typically moderate-intensity exercise) should be implemented. International guidelines and expert consensus recommend healthcare professionals to prescribe cardiorespiratory exercise based on field tests (i.e. 6MWT). However, as a submaximal assessment, the 6MWT typically elicits submaximal functional responses, which distinctively differ from the peak physiological demands captured during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Recent evidence highlights the first metabolic threshold (MT1) as an optimal benchmark for prescribing cardiorespiratory exercise. This physiological marker establishes the transition from light to moderate exercise intensity and can be accurately determined via a CPET.

Sticking to traditional exercise prescription models can cause imprecise monitoring and dosing, which may compromise patient safety, increase frustration, and lower adherence. This ongoing uncertainty in prescribing cardiorespiratory exercise for people with COPD can impair pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes and potentially lead to flawed healthcare policy decisions.

Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to compare exercise prescription based on MT1 and on the 6MWT for improving power output at MT1 in people with COPD. Secondary aim is to compare exercise adherence, peripheral muscle strength, health-related quality of life, dyspnoea, fatigue, disease impact, and emotional status between MT1 and 6MWT-based prescriptions.

This study will be conducted at Unidade Local de Saúde do Baixo Mondego, Figueira da Foz, Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Aveiro, and at the Laboratory of Research and Respiratory Rehabilitation of the School of Health Sciences of the University of Aveiro (LAB3R-ESSUA).

Patients with a formal diagnose of stable COPD and a maximal CPET with MT1 determination will be included. Individuals who have unstable or severe comorbidities (e.g., musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiovascular, neoplastic, or immunological) that prevent participation in pulmonary rehabilitation, as well as those who have completed or attended a pulmonary rehabilitation program within the past 12 months will be excluded.

Sociodemographic and general clinical data will be collected. Instruments assessing health-related quality of life, dyspnoea, fatigue, disease impact, emotional status, and cough will be applied.

Sample size calculation was performed using G*Power version 3.1 (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany).

A sample size calculation was computed using G*Power3.1.9.6 for the within-between interaction of a mixed ANOVA with two groups and 2 assessments (baseline and post pulmonary rehabilitation) of the primary outcome. The sample size was estimated considering an alpha=0.05, power=0.80, repeated measures correlation=0.5, nonsphericity correction=1, and a moderate effect, partial eta squared (η2) of 0.06, the required sample size was 34 participants. As the anticipated dropout rate was 25% a final anticipated sample size was 46 participants (23/group).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of COPD;
  • Complete a maximal CPET with MT1 identification.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of unstable or significant conditions (e.g. musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiovascular, neoplasia or immunological) that renders the participation in the pulmonary rehabilitation program infeasible;
  • Participated in pulmonary rehabilitation in the last 12 months.

Treatment and study plan

Non-pharmacological intervention: Pulmonary rehabilitation programme

Other

Participants will undergo a supervised, in-person pulmonary rehabilitation programme lasting for twelve weeks, twice a week. The intervention comprises cardiorespiratory exercise training, conducted on either a treadmill or a cycle ergometer. Exercise intensity will be individually prescribed based on the power output registered at the first metabolic threshold, during a baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test. For treadmill exercise prescription, guideline-based estimation equations will be used to estimate treadmill velocity based on the oxygen uptake obtained in the first metabolic threshold. Resistance training will be provided in the same sessions as internationally recommended. Progress will occur on weekly basis, according to symptoms. Education and psychosocial support will also be provided once every other week. All sessions will range from 60-90 minutes.

Primary outcomes

  1. Exercise capacity - Power output at first metabolic threshold

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    Power output at first metabolic threshold will be measured during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (watts).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Exercise capacity - Peak power output

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    Peak power output will be measured during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (watts).

  2. Exercise capacity - Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    6MWT is a submaximal exercise test and is commonly used to assess functional status. It is a valid and reliable measure in COPD. It will be used as a secondary measure for exercise capacity.

  3. Cardiorespiratory fitness - Maximum oxygen uptake

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    Maximum oxygen uptake (mL/Kg/min) is considered a key indicator of exercise tolerance and an important predictor of longevity. It is typically assessed during cardiopulmonary exercise testing and is characterized by a plateau in oxygen uptake despite a continued increase in external power output.

  4. Handgrip strength

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    Handgrip strength will be measured with a dynamometer (kg).

  5. Quadriceps Maximum Voluntary Strength (QMVS)

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    QMVS will be measured using a handheld dynamometer (kilogram/force).

  6. One-Minute Sit-To-Stand (1min-STS)

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    The 1min-STS will be used to assess functional capacity. The maximum number of repetitions completed in 1 minute while sitting and standing on a chair will be counted.

  7. Disease impact - Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT)

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    CAAT assesses diseases' impact, presenting 8 items related to respiratory symptoms (cough, chest symptoms and impacts on well-being and day-to-day, related to dyspnoea, activity limitation, confidence to leave home, sleep and energy level), classified from 0 to 5. The total score is calculated by adding the score of the 8 items, ranging from 0 to 40 points, with a higher score corresponding to a greater impact of the disease. The total score can be divided into 4 levels: 1) low, 2) moderate, 3) high and 4) very high impact. The CAAT proved to be valid and reliable for people with COPD.

  8. Emotional Status - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    HADS was developed with the aim of providing health professionals with a reliable, valid and easy-to-use measure to identify and quantify the level of depression and anxiety. It consists of two subscales, which are scored separately: one for anxiety (seven items) and one for depression (seven items). Each item is scored from 0 to 3 points, so each subscale varies between 0 and 21 points. Scores between 0 and 7 are considered "normal", between 8 and 10 "light", between 11 and 14 "moderate", and between 15 and 21 "severe" levels of anxiety/depression.

  9. Dyspnoea severity - Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Questionnaire (mMRC)

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    The mMRC is a validated 5-point Likert scale used to assess dyspnoea severity. Scores range from 0 ("dyspnoea only with strenuous exercise") to 4 ("too dyspnoeic to leave the house or breathless when dressing").

  10. Health-Related Quality of Life - Saint-George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    SGRQ will be used to assess Health-Related quality of life. The SGRQ is a comprehensive well-established 50-item questionnaire to measure health status in patients with COPD. Scores can be provided for each domain (symptoms, activities and impact) and as a total score, ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 100 (worst possible health status).

  11. Fatigue severity - Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-FS)

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme (12 weeks)

    FACIT-FS assesses fatigue where a higher score translates into lower fatigue. This scale is commonly used in the COPD population to assess fatigue, presenting good reliability and feasibility.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Alda S Marques, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

00351 234 372 462

Odete M Alves, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

00351 234 372 476

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aveiro University

Other

Registry information

Acronym: FITME

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2029
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.