Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100853, China
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Dai-Hong Liu, director
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Li-ping Dou, Dr.
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07791576
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a population pharmacokinetics (PK)-guided targeted ATG dosing strategy in haploidentical stem cell transplantation and to observe the GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in the cohort receiving this strategy.
Interested in participating?
Request Info14 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100853, China
Location status: Recruiting
Dai-Hong Liu, director
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Li-ping Dou, Dr.
CONTACT
Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy in treating hematologic malignancies and has become the primary allogeneic transplantation modality in China. However, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a critical complication that significantly reduces early survival and long-term quality of life (QoL). GVHD not only severely suppresses immune function but also presents challenges in treatment, including complexity, high costs, prolonged duration, and limited efficacy. Therefore, optimizing GVHD prevention strategies offers greater clinical value than expanding treatment options, as it effectively reduces acute and chronic GVHD incidence and improves overall survival (OS) and long-term QoL.
Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), a polyclonal immunosuppressant, is widely used in related haplo-HSCT. The conventional high-dose rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin, 10 mg/kg) effectively promotes engraftment and prevents fatal GVHD but significantly increases the risk of severe viral infections (e.g., CMV, EBV) and may increase relapse rates due to excessive immunosuppression weakening the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Dose reduction studies have shown trade-offs: lowering ATG from 10 mg/kg to 6 mg/kg reduced infections but increased severe acute GVHD from 4.5% to 16.1%; a 7.5 mg/kg regimen lowered severe acute GVHD to 7.9% but with significantly higher viral reactivation.
The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) better reflects ATG exposure than single pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. The investigators established an ATG-AUC assay and analyzed 106 haplo-HSCT patients receiving uniform 10 mg/kg ATG, revealing substantial inter-individual AUC variability. Some patients had ATG-AUC above or below the optimal exposure window. Modeling of over 1,000 concentration samples (2022) identified the optimal ATG-AUC range as 100-148.5 IU/day/mL. A targeted individualized dosing technique was developed (2023) and validated in a prospective single-arm trial (2024), showing that individualized dosing achieved more patients within or closer to the optimal AUC range compared to fixed dosing. This approach improved post-transplant CD4+ T-cell immune reconstitution, reduced viral reactivation risk without increasing GVHD, and improved long-term survival and QoL.
The next step involves statistical modeling and clinical validation of clinical-biologic parameters (body weight, age, body surface area, lymphocyte count at infusion, graft T-cell count, HLA matching degree) with ATG-AUC from 94 patients to develop a predictive model for individualized ATG dosing. A prospective, single-arm clinical study will be conducted to validate the safety and efficacy of population PK-guided targeted ATG dosing in haplo-HSCT, including the optimal AUC attainment rate (100-148.5 IU/day/mL). Outcomes to be observed include GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), viral reactivation rate, acute/chronic GVHD incidence, treatment-related mortality (TRM), disease-free survival (DFS), OS, and immune reconstitution. The goal is to establish the optimal ATG regimen for haplo-HSCT to improve survival and QoL.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Population pharmacokinetic formula-guided targeted ATG dosing plus classical GVHD prophylaxis regimen
Time frame: 1 year after treatment
GRFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy, or death due to disease relapse, whichever occurs first. The cumulative incidence of GRFS will be estimated using the Fine-Gray competing risk model.
Time frame: 180 days post-transplant
+180 days CMV virus reactivation rate refers to the time from randomization to CMV virus reactivation, relapse or death within 180 days post-transplant. The actual incidence rate is calculated as the number of patients with events / total number of cases × 100%.
Time frame: 100 days post-transplant
Acute GVHD incidence refers to the time from randomization to acute GVHD onset, relapse or death within 100 days post-transplant. The actual incidence rate is calculated as the number of patients with events / total number of cases × 100%.
Time frame: 1 years after treatment
Disease free survival (DFS) refers to the time from treatment to the first lymphoma recurrence.
Time frame: 1 years after treatment
Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) refers to the number of patients with hematologic or MRD relapse from randomization to the last follow-up.
Time frame: 1 years after treatment
Cumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM) refers to death due to non-relapse causes while in complete remission (CR), measured as the number of patients with NRM from randomization to the last follow-up.
Time frame: [Time Frame: 1 year after treatment]
Treatment-related safety indicator: cumulative incidence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) from randomization to the last follow-up.
Time frame: 180 days post-transplant
The +180-day EBV virus reactivation rate refers to the time from randomization to EBV virus reactivation, relapse, or death within 180 days post-transplant. The actual incidence rate is calculated as the number of patients with events / total number of cases × 100%.
Time frame: [Time Frame: 1 year after treatment]
Treatment-related safety indicator: cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (chronic GVHD) from randomization to the last follow-up.
Time frame: 1 years after treatment
Immune reconstitution status refers to the actual incidence rate calculated as the number of patients with immune reconstitution / total number of cases × 100% from randomization to the last follow-up.
Time frame: 1 year after treatment
Overall survival (OS) refers to death from any cause from randomization to the last follow-up. The 1-year OS rate is estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, calculated as the proportion of patients alive at 1 year after treatment; patients lost to follow-up are censored at the date of last contact.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Other
Pharmacokinetic Guided ATG Targeted Dosing Strategy in Unmanipulated Haploidentical Haematopoietic Stem-cell Transplantation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03000244
Cellular Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Genetic Therapy
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07375290
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07579065
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Reggio Emilia, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07725263
Agranulocytosis, Anemia
Haikou, Hainan, China
View Trial Details