Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07788911

External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block With or Without Rectus Sheath Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

This prospective observational cohort study compared postoperative pain outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy who received bilateral external oblique intercostal plane block (EOIPB) alone or bilateral EOIPB combined with bilateral rectus sheath block (RSB). The block technique was selected by the attending anesthesiologist as part of routine clinical practice and was not assigned by the researchers.

Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using a 0-10 visual analog scale at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption, postoperative rescue analgesic consumption, hemodynamic measurements, postoperative nausea and vomiting, other analgesic-related adverse effects, and patient satisfaction were also evaluated during the first 24 postoperative hours.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, 34147, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Regional fascial plane blocks are used as part of multimodal analgesia after laparoscopic abdominal surgery. The external oblique intercostal plane block may provide analgesia to the upper anterior and lateral abdominal wall, while the addition of a rectus sheath block may improve analgesic coverage of the anterior abdominal wall.

This single-center prospective observational cohort study included 104 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were observed in two cohorts according to the regional anesthesia technique they received during routine clinical care: bilateral EOIPB alone or bilateral EOIPB combined with bilateral RSB. The attending anesthesiologist selected and performed the block technique independently of the study investigators. The investigators did not randomize participants or assign the regional anesthesia technique.

The primary objective was to compare postoperative pain intensity between the two cohorts using a 0-10 visual analog scale at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Secondary assessments included intraoperative remifentanil consumption, postoperative rescue analgesic consumption during the first 24 hours, perioperative hemodynamic measurements, postoperative nausea and vomiting, other analgesic-related adverse effects, and patient satisfaction.

Routine perioperative anesthetic management and the standard postoperative analgesic regimen were similar in both cohorts. Additional rescue analgesics were administered according to individual clinical need, and the total rescue analgesic consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours was recorded. All study assessments were completed during the first 24 hours after surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 70 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III
  • Scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Received bilateral EOIPB alone or bilateral EOIPB combined with bilateral RSB as part of routine clinical care
  • Provided written informed consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindication to regional block procedures, including coagulopathy, anticoagulant use, or local infection at the needle insertion site
  • Known severe cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic disease
  • Life-threatening hematological disease
  • Neurological disease or psychiatric disorder
  • Known allergy to the medications used in the study or to amide-type local anesthetics
  • History of chronic pain
  • History of narcotic substance or alcohol dependence
  • Body mass index of 35 kg/m² or greater
  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal to participate

Treatment and study plan

Bilateral External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block

Procedure

Under ultrasound guidance, bilateral external oblique intercostal plane block was performed using a total of 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine solution, with 20 mL administered on each side. The final solution was prepared by mixing 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 20 mL of normal saline, corresponding to a total bupivacaine dose of 100 mg. The procedure was selected and performed by the attending anesthesiologist as part of routine clinical practice, independently of the study investigators.

Other names: EOIPB

Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block

Procedure

Under ultrasound guidance, bilateral rectus sheath block was performed using a total of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine solution, with 10 mL administered on each side. The final solution was prepared by mixing 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 10 mL of normal saline, corresponding to a total bupivacaine dose of 50 mg. The procedure was selected and performed by the attending anesthesiologist as part of routine clinical practice, independently of the study investigators.

Other names: RSB

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity Assessed by Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: At 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

    Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using a 0-10 visual analog scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Scores were compared between the two cohorts.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Intraoperative Remifentanil Consumption

    Time frame: From induction of anesthesia to the end of surgery

    The total cumulative dose of remifentanil administered during surgery was recorded in milligrams and compared between the two cohorts.

  2. Total Postoperative Opioid Consumption

    Time frame: During the first 24 hours after surgery

    The total cumulative dose of intravenous tramadol administered as rescue analgesia was recorded in milligrams and compared between the two cohorts.

  3. Patient Satisfaction With Postoperative Analgesia

    Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

    Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale: 1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied. Scores were compared between the two cohorts.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Bilateral External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block With and Without Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 27, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.