Patient Observation
OtherUndergo surveillance
NCT Number: NCT07785687
This phase III trial compares post-surgical surveillance to post-surgical radiation therapy for improving survival without disease progression in clinically low-risk patients with a grade 1 meningioma that is new or that has come back after a period of improvement (recurrent) or a new grade 2 meningioma who have undergone surgery. Post-surgical surveillance involves closely watching a patient's condition but not giving treatment unless there are changes in test results. Active surveillance avoids problems that may be caused by treatments such as radiation or surgery. It is used to find early signs that the condition is getting worse. During active surveillance, patients will be given certain exams and tests done on a regular schedule. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. The usual approach for low grade and low clinical risk meningiomas is surgery followed by radiation or no further treatment (observation) based on clinical risk factors such as tumor grade and the amount of tumor able to be removed. Clinical factors such as meningioma grade and the amount of meningioma that was removed help doctors decide whether radiation or observation is better after surgery. In this study, a patient's molecular risk, as determined using biomarkers, is also considered when assigning treatment. For patients with grade 1 or 2 meningiomas with a low clinical risk but high molecular risk of growing or coming back after surgery, this study will compare the usual approach of post-surgery observation to another usual approach of post-surgery radiation. Using high molecular risk to decide usual treatment and receiving the usual radiation could increase the amount of time without the tumor growing or coming back, but it could also cause side effects. For patients with grade 1 or 2 meningiomas with a low clinical risk and low molecular risk of growing or coming back after surgery, this study will evaluate if using molecular risk shows a greater benefit of the usual post-surgery observation.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine if progression free survival (PFS) is improved with postoperative radiotherapy compared to postoperative surveillance for patients with clinical low-risk, molecular high-risk meningiomas, as defined using a centralized 34-gene expression biomarker and centralized neuro-radiology review. (Cohort A) II. To determine if 5-year PFS is greater than 90% with postoperative surveillance for patients with clinical and molecular low-risk meningiomas, as defined using a centralized 34-gene expression biomarker and centralized neuro-radiology review. (Cohort B)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine if overall survival (OS) of patients with clinical low-risk, molecular high-risk meningiomas is improved with postoperative radiotherapy compared to postoperative surveillance. (Cohort A) II. To determine if the time-to-next-treatment of patients with clinical low-risk, molecular high-risk meningiomas is improved with postoperative radiotherapy compared to postoperative surveillance. (Cohort A) III. To define the safety and tolerability of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with clinical low-risk, molecular high-risk meningiomas using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 5.0. (Cohort A) IV. To determine if postoperative radiotherapy leads to increased neurocognitive function (NCF) deterioration, as assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA), and the Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B, as compared to postoperative surveillance for patients with clinical low-risk, molecular high-risk meningiomas. (Cohort A) V. To determine if postoperative radiotherapy leads to increased patient-reported neurological symptom burden, as measured by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) module, as compared to postoperative surveillance for patients with clinical low-risk, molecular high-risk meningiomas. (Cohort A) VI. To define the OS of patients with clinical and molecular low-risk meningiomas with postoperative surveillance. (Cohort B) VII. To define the safety profile of postoperative surveillance for patients with clinical and molecular low-risk meningiomas using CTCAE 5.0. (Cohort B)
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. To explore additional biomarkers in pre-treatment tumor tissue, blood, or serum that may elucidate the efficacy, safety, or tolerability of postoperative radiotherapy compared to postoperative surveillance.
OUTLINE: Patients with a high gene expression risk score after gross total resection (GTR) or subtotal resection (STR) or intermediate gene expression risk score after STR (Cohort A) are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. Patients with low gene expression risk score after GTR or STR or intermediate gene expression risk score after GTR (Cohort B) are assigned to Arm I.
ARM I: Patients undergo surveillance on study. Patients also undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the trial and undergo collection of plasma, serum, and blood samples on study.
ARM II: Patients undergo intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) 5 days per week for a total of 30 fractions over 50 days or undergo fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) for a total of 5 fractions over 10 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo MRI and collection of plasma, serum, and blood samples throughout the trial.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months, every 6 months in years 2 and 3, and then yearly in years 4 and 5.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-
Undergo surveillance
Undergo MRI
Undergo collection of plasma, serum, and blood samples
Undergo IMRT
Undergo IMPT
Undergo FSRT
Ancillary studies
Ancillary Studies
Time frame: From randomization until the first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to 5 years
The log-rank test will be used to test the difference in PFS between the arms. Will estimate progression free survival by arm using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Cox proportional hazards model will be used to estimate the treatment hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval.
Time frame: From randomization until the first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to 5 years
A one-sided 5% level Wald test will be used to determine if the observed hazard for progression free survival is better than that specified under the null hypothesis. Will estimate progression free survival using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Greenwood's formula will be used to estimate the confidence intervals for 5-year progression free survival.
Time frame: From randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Analysis for overall survival will consist of estimation of its distribution for each study arm via the Kaplan-Meier method and a stratified log-rank test. Additional analyses may consist of estimating the treatment hazard ratio via the Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for randomization stratification factors, evaluating whether the proportional hazards assumption holds or whether any treatment effect is notably time-varying, and evaluating for potential treatment by prognostic covariate interactions.
Time frame: From randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Analysis for overall survival will consist of estimation of its distribution for each study arm via the Kaplan-Meier method and a stratified log-rank test. Additional analyses may consist of estimating the treatment hazard ratio via the Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for randomization stratification factors, evaluating whether the proportional hazards assumption holds or whether any treatment effect is notably time-varying, and evaluating for potential treatment by prognostic covariate interactions.
Time frame: From randomization until reoperation in the prior surgical bed or prior radiotherapy field, re-irradiation in the prior surgical bed or radiotherapy field, or initiation of systemic meningioma-directed medical therapy, assessed up to 5 years
Time to next treatment (TTNT) (Cohort A)
Time frame: At months 3, 6, and 12 for the first year then every 6 months for year 2
Adverse events (AEs) will be graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Comprehensive summaries of AEs by treatment arm will be generated and examined. Counts and frequencies of worst (highest score) AE per patient will be presented overall and by AE type category, separately by assigned treatment group. The proportion of patients with at least one grade 3 or higher AE will be compared between treatment arms. Any frequencies to be tested will be evaluated using the chi-square or exact test as appropriate, with two-sided significance level 0.05.
Time frame: At months 3, 6, and 12 for the first year then every 6 months for year 2
AEs will be graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Comprehensive summaries of AEs by treatment arm will be generated and examined. Counts and frequencies of worst (highest score) AE per patient will be presented overall and by AE type category, separately by assigned treatment group. The proportion of patients with at least one grade 3 or higher AE will be compared between treatment arms. Any frequencies to be tested will be evaluated using the chi-square or exact test as appropriate, with two-sided significance level 0.05.
Time frame: Every 12 months for 5 years
Will determine whether postoperative radiotherapy increases patient-reported neurological symptom burden compared with postoperative surveillance in patients with clinical low-risk, molecular high-risk meningiomas. Neurological symptom burden will be assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) module, a patient-reported outcome measure in which symptom severity items are scored on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale, where 0 = symptom not present and 10 = symptom as bad as imaginable. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden (worse outcome). For the primary analysis evaluating between-arm differences in MDASI-BT scores over time, a general mixed-effects model for repeated measures will be fitted to assess changes in scores by treatment arm.
Time frame: Every 12 months for 5 years
Neurocognitive function will be assessed using the Trail Making Test (TMT), a measure of attention, processing speed, and executive function. Neurocognitive failure will be defined according to the protocol-specified criteria for deterioration from baseline on the TMT. TTNCF analyses will be performed as described above. TMT performance is typically measured as completion time in seconds; lower completion times indicate better neurocognitive performance and higher values indicate worse performance.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be provided by sex.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be provided by race.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be provided by ethnicity.
NRG Oncology
Other
A Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial of Postoperative Radiotherapy Versus Postoperative Surveillance for Clinical Low-Risk, Molecular High-Risk Meningioma and Longitudinal Surveillance for Clinical and Molecular Low-Risk Meningioma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04082520
Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Grade 1 Meningioma
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03604978
Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Grade 2 Meningioma
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03180268
Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Grade 2 Meningioma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details