Kafrelsheikh University (Faculty of Physical Therapy)
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, 33516, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07784465
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training in improving pelvic floor muscle strength, decreasing urinary incontinence symptoms, reducing genital prolaps and enhancing the quality of life in women after hysterectomy.
Interested in participating?
Request Info45 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, 33516, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Hysterectomy, the surgical removal of the uterus, remains one of the most frequently performed gynecological procedures worldwide, indicated for both malignant and benign conditions.
Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common complication after hysterectomy, manifesting as urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and colorectal symptoms.
Conventional pelvic floor rehabilitation focuses on pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), widely known as Kegel exercises, to strengthen weakened muscles and improve continence.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will undergo standard post hysterectomy care protocol with electromyographic (EMG)-based biofeedback guidance, using a vaginal sensor to provide real-time visual and/or auditory feedback on pelvic floor muscles contractions.
Participants will perform undergo standard post hysterectomy core protocol without biofeedback assistance.
Time frame: 12 weeks of intervention
Female sexual function will be assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), a validated 19-item questionnaire evaluating six domains: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The total FSFI score ranges from 2 to 36, with higher scores indicating better sexual function. The change in total FSFI score from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention will be compared between the two study groups.
Time frame: 12 weeks of intervention
Pelvic floor muscle strength will be assessed using an electromyographic (EMG)-based biofeedback device with an intravaginal sensor. Peak EMG amplitude during maximal voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions will be recorded as an objective measure of pelvic floor muscle strength. The change from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention will be compared between the two study groups.
Time frame: 12 weeks of intervention
Urinary incontinence severity will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). The questionnaire evaluates the frequency and severity of urinary leakage and its impact on daily life. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater severity. The change in ICIQ-UI SF score from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention will be compared between the two study groups.
Time frame: 12 weeks of intervention
Pelvic floor-related quality of life will be assessed using the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-Short Form 7 (PFIQ-7). The questionnaire assesses the impact of urinary, colorectal, and pelvic organ prolapse symptoms on daily activities and quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 300, with higher scores indicating greater negative impact on quality of life. The change in PFIQ-7 score from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention will be compared between the two study groups.
Time frame: 12 weeks of intervention
Pelvic organ prolapse severity will be assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. POP-Q measurements will be performed at baseline and after the 12-week intervention to objectively assess changes in pelvic organ support and prolapse stage. Changes in POP-Q measurements and prolapse stage will be compared between the two study groups.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Kafrelsheikh University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07274072
Behavior, Costs and Cost Analysis
Zollikon, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT07264439
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (ADRD)
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06929533
Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR), Anxiety Disorders
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06992778
Effectiveness, Hearing Aid
Køge, Denmark
View Trial Details