Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07781111

The ProActive Study- Integrating a Proactive and Palliative Care Approach to Diabetic Ulcer Care

The ProActive study aims to investigate the feasibility of integrating a proactive palliative care approach into routine care for people with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU).

The ProActive model includes procedures to identify patients who may benefit from a palliative approach and structured serious illness conversations (SIC) addressing patients' health situation, concerns, priorities, and preferences for care. Relatives may be involved when appropriate.

The study examines the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of the ProActive model and its implementation from the perspectives of patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals. It also evaluates the feasibility of outcome measures and data collection procedures for a future effectiveness study and examines the procedures used to identify patients who may benefit from the intervention.

The feasibility study is conducted at two DFU clinics in Denmark and consists of four complementary sub-studies using qualitative and quantitative methods.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

People with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) may live with substantial symptom burden, impaired quality of life, uncertainty, and complex care needs. Despite the serious health consequences associated with DFU, a palliative approach is not routinely integrated into DFU care. The ProActive study therefore investigates the feasibility of integrating a proactive palliative care approach into routine DFU care.

The ProActive model includes systematic procedures for identifying patients who may benefit from a palliative approach and structured serious illness conversations (SIC). The conversations provide an opportunity to discuss the patient's understanding of their health situation, concerns, priorities, and preferences for future care. Relatives may participate when appropriate.

Healthcare professionals at the participating DFU clinics receive training and support to deliver the intervention and integrate it into existing clinical practice. The implementation process is informed by the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions, with particular attention to context, stakeholder involvement, and uncertainties related to feasibility.

Study 1 investigates the feasibility of the ProActive model and its implementation from the perspective of healthcare professionals. Data are collected through observations during implementation activities and focus group interviews with healthcare professionals (N=14). Particular attention is given to the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the intervention and its implementation in routine DFU care.

Study 2 explores patients' and relatives' experiences of the ProActive model and SIC. Patients participating in the intervention, and relatives when applicable, are invited to qualitative interviews exploring their experiences of the conversation and the relevance and acceptability of introducing a proactive palliative approach in DFU care. The study includes up to 20 patients and their relatives.

Study 3 evaluates the feasibility of outcome measures and data collection procedures intended for use in a future effectiveness evaluation. Patient-, relative-, and healthcare professional-reported measures are collected to assess completion, timing, participant burden, and the suitability of the selected measures and procedures. The study includes up to 50 patients and their relatives where applicable, and 14 healthcare professionals.

Study 4 evaluates the procedures used to identify and recruit patients who may benefit from the ProActive model. All patients with DFU referred to the participating clinics during the 12-month test phase (N=400) are included in a retrospective assessment of identification and recruitment procedures and selected clinical outcomes.

Findings from the four sub-studies will be integrated to assess the overall feasibility of the ProActive model and its implementation and to identify refinements needed before a future evaluation of effectiveness.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Study 1-3:

Inclusion criteria

Health professionals:

  • Healthcare professionals involved in DFU care and in the implementation and delivery of the ProActive model at one of the participating sites, including specialized wound care nurses and vascular or orthopaedic surgeons.

Patient and relatives

  • Aged ≥18 years.
  • Have a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).
  • Receive care at one of the two participating outpatient wound clinics.
  • Are offered and participate in a Status Conversation as part of the ProActive model in routine clinical practice.
  • Are able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Healthcare professionals:

-Not involved in DFU care or in the implementation or delivery of the ProActive model at the participating sites.

Patients and relatives:

  • Unable to provide informed consent.
  • Do not otherwise meet the relevant inclusion criteria.

Study 4:

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥18 years.
  • Have a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).
  • Are newly referred to one of the participating outpatient wound clinics during the 12-month test phase, or develop a new or recurrent DFU during ongoing follow-up at one of the participating clinics.
  • Included regardless of whether they are identified as potentially relevant for, offered, or participate in a Status Conversation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are not newly referred during the test phase and who do not develop a new or recurrent DFU during ongoing follow-up at one of the participating clinics.
  • Patients with insufficient Danish language skills to understand questionnaires or study instructions, or with cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of instructions or participation in a Status Conversation.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of the ProActive model assessed by AIM

    Time frame: After the 3-month test phase

    Acceptability of the ProActive model will be assessed among clinicians using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). AIM consists of 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability.

  2. Feasibility of the ProActive model assessed by FIM

    Time frame: After the 3-month test phase

    Feasibility of the ProActive model will be assessed among clinicians using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). FIM consists of 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility.

  3. Appropriateness of the ProActive model assessed by IAM

    Time frame: After the 3-month test phase

    Appropriateness of the ProActive model will be assessed among clinicians using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). IAM consists of 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness.

  4. Clinician experiences of ProActive implementation assessed by focus group interviews

    Time frame: After the 3-month test phase

    Clinicians' experiences of implementing ProActive in routine diabetic foot ulcer care will be explored through post-intervention focus group interviews. Interviews will address implementation, local adaptation, interdisciplinary collaboration, barriers and facilitators, and integration into routine clinical practice.

  5. Patient and relative experiences of Status Conversations assessed by interviews

    Time frame: Approximately 3 weeks after the Status Conversation

    Patient and relative experiences of ProActive will be explored through semi-structured interviews after participation in a Status Conversation. Interviews will address experiences of being met with a proactive palliative care approach, perceived relevance and timing of the Status Conversation, preparation, emotional impact, involvement of relatives, and perceived benefits and challenges.

  6. Feasibility of patient-reported questionnaire completion

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months after the Status Conversation

    Feasibility of patient-reported questionnaire completion will be assessed descriptively using response rates, completeness of questionnaire data, missing data, and timing of completion for patient-reported questionnaires.

  7. Feasibility of identification procedures for Status Conversations

    Time frame: During the 12-month test phase, with retrospective assessment after 1-year follow-up

    Feasibility of identification procedures will be assessed descriptively using the proportion of eligible patients assessed for potential relevance for a Status Conversation, identified as potentially relevant, offered a Status Conversation, and accepting or declining the conversation.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Trine Herskind Hasløv, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4522475483

Ulla Riis Madsen, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4593576367

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ulla Riis Madsen

Other

Collaborators

  • Independent Research Fund Denmark
  • Kolding Sygehus
  • OPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark
  • REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
  • Steno Diabetes Center Sjaelland

Registry information

Official study title

The ProActive Study- Integrating a Proactive and Palliative Care Approach to Diabetic Ulcer Care. A Feasibility Study.

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2029
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.