Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, The Parker Institute
Frederiksberg, 2000, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT07780123
The goal of this feasibility cluster randomized trial is to determine whether a future large pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial can be conducted to evaluate the effects of a nature-based intervention on children's mental and physical health. The intervention will be delivered in preschools located in or near public housing areas and compared with usual activities in similar preschools.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Are parents willing to participate in follow-up assessment using the Strengths and Dif-ficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)? * Can participants be successfully recruited, and can the nature-based intervention be delivered as intended? * Is it possible to gather data on children's motor development, physical activity, sleep, absenteeism, and stress, and on stress and absenteeism among educators and parents? * Is the intervention safe and acceptable for children, parents, and educators?
Researchers will compare a 14-week nature-based intervention with usual preschool activities.
The nature-based intervention is based on the Danish Outdoor Council's Green Sprouts ("Grønne Spirer") programme and focuses on using nature for play and learning. The intervention is being developed together with educators and children and includes nature-based activities designed to support motor development, physical activity, and positive interactions between children.
Participants will:
* Take part in either the nature-based intervention or usual preschool activities. * Complete questionnaires about child well-being, quality of life, and parental stress. * Participate in assessments of fine and gross motor skills. * Wear an activity monitor to measure physical activity and sleep. * Provide hair samples for measurement of stress-related hormones. * Take part in interviews and observations.
The study will include approximately 56 children aged 4 to 6 years, their parents, and approx-imately 15 educators.
The results will help determine whether the intervention can be implemented in preschools as currently designed and will inform the planning of a future large cluster-randomized controlled trial. No major risks are expected. Participants may experience minor discomfort when a small hair sample is collected for stress measurement.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified4 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Frederiksberg, 2000, Denmark
The report reveals persistent socioeconomic and regional differences in how children engage with nature as also shown in other studies. Children in rural areas and smaller towns tend to spend more time outdoors overall, benefiting from the closer proximity to nature. In contrast, children in urban areas, particularly in the Capital Region and Region Zealand, use schoolyards, playgrounds, and urban parks, with fewer opportunities for spontaneous nature experiences. On weekends, however, urban families, particularly those from higher educational backgrounds, are more likely to travel to forests and beaches. Meanwhile, those parents with lower educational levels face greater barriers to nature access, including transportation limitations and fewer nearby green spaces. While their total outdoor time is comparable to other groups, they are significantly less likely to visit public natural areas, especially on weekdays.
Seasonal differences further impact children's outdoor activity, with outdoor activities more prevalent in summer months and higher engagement with nature compared to winter. It is important to highlight a crucial distinction between general outdoor activities which includes playgrounds, yards and streets, and direct engagement with natural environments, emphasising that while children may spend considerable time outdoors, they do not necessarily interact with nature. The Danish Outdoor Council [Friluftsrådet] stresses the unique benefits of nature exposure, extending beyond conventional outdoor play at playgrounds. The outdoor environment can be categorized into two groups, the green outdoor environment which includes nature, and the grey outdoor environment which includes streets and other outdoor environments which are not nature.
A recent Danish health report indicated that 5.2% of children with a mean age of 6.6 years assessed their overall well-being as low. Another Danish report among children aged 0-9 years stated that at least 16% of young children experience mental health issues or psychiatric diseases.
Exposure to green outdoor environments might promote emotional well-being, reduce stress, fostering social connectedness, support cognitive development and better sleep quality among children, all of which are crucial for learning abilities and daily functioning. Furthermore, regular outdoor activities in nature have been shown to reduce ADHD symptoms, improve concentration, and enhance executive functioning. Additionally, it is speculated that nature-connectedness, e.g. the feeling of being emotionally and psychologically part of the natural world, fosters stronger social bonds and greater emotional regulation, all of which contribute to children's psychological well-being. However, the evidence for these benefits among young children is still limited as only few studies have been conducted among this age group.
Findings from our previous qualitative study in rotating kindergartens (the same children were biweekly changing their kindergarten setting from rural more green outdoor to an urban with much indoor or grey outdoor time) showed that preschool children, while in nature in the rural setting, gained self-confidence by engaging in risky play (line climbing threes) and overcoming physical obstacles in the changing natural environment, opposite to the stationary environment presented by formal playgrounds in conventional kindergartens (urban setting). Further, the preschool teachers also stressed that those children that were more imaginative, engaged in fewer conflicts, were less interrupted during play, and used other motor skills while in nature as compared to when at the conventional playground. Similar results were found in a cluster randomized intervention study promoting more physical activity in the intervention kindergartens where significant improvement was seen in endurance performance. The investigators also showed previously that during the time the children spent in the outdoor kindergarten, they were more physically active as compared to when they were in the conventional kindergarten setting. In our stratified analysis of motor skills by level of maternal education, the investigators showed a tendency towards a lower risk of motor difficulties among children from outdoor- compared to children from conventional kindergartens, particularly for those children who had less educated mothers. This suggests that attending an outdoor kindergarten may improve motor abilities, in particularly among children from low SES families. However, other studies have shown better endurance performance only among children from high or medium SES families. These discrepant findings highlight the need for more studies especially targeted interventions.
Given that up to 97% of preschool children attend kindergartens up to 40 hours per week, a nature-based intervention in kindergartens presents a practical, low-cost, and scalable solution to promoting child well-being by providing an optimal and equitable platform for fostering structured outdoor activities and nature engagement. By integrating nature-based interventions into early childhood education, municipalities can proactively support children's physical and mental health, while also addressing disparities in access to green spaces. Furthermore, recognizing that the need for outdoor activity is highest during winter, the intervention will be designed to operate year-round, ensuring that children remain active, engaged, and exposed to nature even during the colder months.
Given the complexity of implementing structured nature-based interventions in kindergartens, conducting a feasibility study is a critical first step before progressing to a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT). Kindergartens vary in organizational structures, educational priorities, and staff capacity, all of which can impact the success of an intervention. A feasibility study will help assess recruitment potential among kindergartens, parental willingness to enroll children, and outcome response rates. Additionally, the feasibility study will identify logistical barriers, ensure ethical considerations are addressed, and inform necessary adjustments to enhance feasibility, compliance, and data quality before committing to a full-scale trial.
Specifically, the objectives of the present feasibility study are to investigate
Additionally, it will explore participants' (e.g. kindergarten personnel and parents) experiences and the acceptability of the intervention in a process evaluation.
The findings will inform the feasibility of the larger CRCT and contribute to the design and power calculations necessary for a future trial.
2.1. Hypothesis The investigators hypothesise that the Nurture by Nature feasibility trial is feasible (e.g. that the participants are willing to participate in the trial, complete assessments, and the intervention is accepted by the participants).
3.2. Clusters, Participants and setting The feasibility CRCT will be carried out in 5 kindergartens, as defined by the power calculation. The kindergarten management together with the staff responsible for the daily operations of the kindergarten will decide whether the kindergarten will participate in the CRCT in one of their kindergarten groups. Although the management team of the kindergarten decides whether or not to participate in the CRCT, it is up to the eligible participants (the kindergarten personnel, and the parents and children) if they give consent and contribute data to the trial.
Each kindergarten can contribute with one pre-existing group of children, which the investigators refer to as a cluster. Each cluster should include at least 11 eligible children consenting to participate.
The 5 clusters will be randomised; 3 will be allocated to receive the nature-based intervention, and 2 will be allocated to usual activities. Since the clusters are pre-existing groups within the kindergartens, they will include children not eligible, hence under the age of 4, and those who do not consent to contribute data or withdraw their consent. However, although some children in the clusters do not contribute data, all children in the cluster will receive the intervention if randomised to the intervention group.
Kindergarten personnel working in the included clusters, will be asked if they want to consent to contribute data, expectedly n=15.
Participants (children and parents or kindergarten personnel) who withdraw during the trial will not be replaced. Children who join the kindergarten group during the intervention period will not be enrolled in the trial nor contribute with data, but will receive the intervention if they are int the intervention group.
The overall number of participating children, parents and kindergarten personnel will be respectively n=56, n=56 and n=15.
From now on in the protocol, the term 'participant' will include children, parents and kindergarten personnel unless other is stated.
The trial will take place in the kindergartens and nearby nature settings.
The usual activities clusters (the control comparator group) will follow usual practices which may include trips outside the kindergarten area as well as indoor and playground activities.
4.1. Adherence to the intervention Adherence to the Nurture by Nature intervention will be monitored and recorded during the trial. Adherence is defined as the number of outdoor sessions and activities done will be registered by kindergarten personnel.
The investigators will assess qualitative and quantitative outcomes in an exploratory manner.
5.1. Feasibility outcomes The feasibility outcomes will be assessed with the 'traffic light' system, where a set of progression criteria are categorized into red, amber, and green, each reflecting different levels of success (green = go, amber = modify, red = stop). The current nature-based intervention will be deemed feasible if most indicators are above the thresholds denoted in the 'green' column and no indicator below the threshold denoted in the 'red' column. The thresholds for red, amber, and green were decided by the project management group.
5.2. Qualitative outcomes and process evaluation To qualify the primary feasibility outcomes (quantitative assessments of recruitment and fidelity rates) the investigators will investigate the acceptability of the intervention among the kindergarten personnel and parents in a process evaluation which is in line with the Medical Research Council's recommendations for evaluating complex interventions, thus providing in-depth insight into experiences, challenges, and suggestions for improvement.
The main research objectives of the process evaluation are: To assess the fidelity of implementation (i.e., delivery of the intervention according to the trial protocol). To explore how kindergarten personnel and parents respond to and experience the intervention. To identify the key enablers and barriers to implementation.
The process evaluation will be based on qualitative interviews with up to 10 parents and up to 10 staff members and supplemented by quantitative measures of implementation fidelity. Fidelity will primarily be assessed as adherence to the intervention protocol. Implementation fidelity will be operationalized as the proportion of intervention weeks in which each intervention cluster delivers at least three planned nature-based activities or outings. This information will be collected through weekly structured checklists completed by kindergarten personnel, documenting frequency and duration of nature-based activities. Qualitative interviews will be used to explore contextual factors, participant engagement, and organizational conditions influencing fidelity, and to understand variations in implementation across clusters. Interviews with kindergarten personnel will explore how they implement the intervention, and how they experience the intervention in terms of meaning, workability, and compatibility with existing practices and roles. Implementation will be investigated in relation to a) the specific intervention activities (i.e., nature-based games) and b) the organizational structure (i.e., being outdoors in all weather in the winter season) that supports the delivery of the intervention. Interviews will be audiotaped and transcribed. The data material will be analyzed using implementation theory.
Results based on the process evaluation will tailor the nature-based intervention for a future full-scale CRCT in kindergartens.
The intervention is generally considered safe, and the investigators do not anticipate an increased risk of adverse events or reactions in the study. Participants will be informed about the following potential risks associated with the intervention:
The recruitment of kindergartens will be done using three recruitment ways in denoted order:
6.2.2. Recruitment of children, parents and kindergarten personnel (participants) Upon acceptance by the kindergarten management, they will distribute project information to kindergarten personnel and parents by e-mail/communication platform like Aula, and place letters in the children's locker area, posters in the kindergarten. The written information will highlight the randomized nature of the trial that it is voluntary to participate, and that children, parents and kindergarten personnel not eligible or who do not consent to contribute data will still receive the intervention. Kindergarten management or personnel will further ask parents for permission to share contact information with the investigators. The investigators will then contact the parents and kindergarten personnel to arrange an individual oral information meeting by phone, online or on-site. The participants will be made aware of the possibility of bringing a support person (e.g., relative or friend) to the information meeting.
6.3. Individual oral information meeting The oral information meeting is planned individually , with the possibility of bringing a support person, by phone, online or on-site in the kindergarten The investigator delivering the oral information will be suitably qualified and experienced and will be authorised to do so by the principal investigator.
The oral information will include that:
Further, the oral information will include: project aim, procedures, potential benefits and risks when participating in the trial, procedures for random findings during the project, procedures for securing the participants privacy and data protection, information on the trial organization, funding, as well as contact information on the primary investigator and other key investigators.
Children who participate in the trial will receive oral information and will be included in the conversations with the parents about the trial to the extent that the child in question can understand the trial situation. The child's own statements will-where relevant-be taken into account.
The investigator will make sure that participants have received and understood the information given to them.
To be enrolled in the trial inclusion criteria must be fulfilled, thus participants will be screened accordingly. Participants not eligible will not be asked to consider signing consent but will be informed that the children and kindergarten personnel are still part of the kindergarten cluster but will not give data.
Potential participants which fit the inclusion criteria wishing to consider participation further will be contacted by investigators after a few days (min. 24 hours). If they wish to participate in the study, a consent form will be sent to them by email or given directly to them in the kindergarten.
Participants who wish to sign the consent form right away, can do so and proceed to baseline assessments (questionnaires). Hair sampling, motor test and accelerometer assessment will be done later but before randomisation.
For each participant, the source documentation and eCRFs will document that informed consent was obtained before participation in the study. The signed informed consent form will remain in each participant's study file and will always be available.
6.4. Assessments and assessment timings Both assessment visits (baseline and end-of-trial assessments) will be conducted at the included kindergartens where the children feel safe.
6.4.1. Baseline assessment The baseline assessment visit will be carried out in the three-week period (termed 'week 0') before the randomization and the intervention begin.
At baseline the following procedures will be performed in the denoted order:
Kindergarten personnel will fill out baseline questionnaire during kindergarten hours or at home via e-boks.
6.4.2. Mid-trial assessment The mid-trial assessment will be caried out in the two-week period (termed 'week 7').
At week seven of intervention the child will again wear the activity tracer to measure physical activity and sleep for four consecutive days. This will be given at the kindergarten by the investigators. The parents are welcome to be present, but it is not a must.
6.4.3. During the trial Text messages by mobile phone will be send weekly to the parents including a question related to child absence the last week.
Information on kindergartens personnel's sickness absence will be collected by the investigators from kindergarten personnel monthly.
Kindergarten personnel report daily activities performed related to the intervention (nature trips and activities carts used).
6.4.4. End-of-trial assessment The end-of-trial assessment visit will be carried out in the two-week period (termed 'week 15-16') after the intervention has ended and no later than 3 weeks after the last intervention week.
The end-of-trial assessment will be held in the kindergartens where the children will be present. It is optional for the parents to be present or to answer the questionnaire online. The investigators will ask the parents what they prefer. At end-of trial the following procedures will be done in the denoted order:
Assessments performed outside these time limits will be registered as protocol deviations.
9.2. General statistical approach As this is a feasibility study, the primary outcomes will be reported descriptively as proportions and percentages. The primary focus is on assessing the feasibility parameters (e.g., data completeness, recruitment, and fidelity), not hypothesis testing. Changes from baseline to end-of-trial in secondary and exploratory outcomes will be summarized descriptively and presented with 95% confidence intervals where applicable. Given the small sample size, these findings will be interpreted cautiously, as they are not intended to establish causal relationships. All statistical tests, if performed, will be two-sided and statistical significance will be claimed if the computed p-value is equal to or less than 0.05. However, all exploratory outcomes will be reported as preliminary and exploratory findings, intended to inform the design and analysis plan of future, more definitive trials.
9.3. Trial conduct The Nurture by Nature intervention is non-invasive and non-medical with components focusing on nature, motor development, peer interactions, physical activity etc., that are commonly used in society and are not generally considered harmful. All participants will, however, be closely monitored for potential adverse reactions, but the investigators anticipate no ethical issues. The intervention is considered justifiable in a health research ethics perspective.
The trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, and The Helsinki Declaration and meets the requirements of the regional ethics committees. The project will be carried out in full compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Danish Data Protection Act, ensuring that all data protection requirements are strictly adhered to throughout the study period. The trial is registered in the Capital Region's research project register (Privacy), and data protection compliance has been reviewed and approved by Forskningsjura in accordance with the Danish Data Protection Act and the GDPR. Any substantial deviation from the protocol will only be implemented after review and approval from relevant regulatory authorities. Any deviation, however minor, will be documented and made available with the protocol.
If the sponsor or the kindergarten management discontinues a participant from the trial, the children and the kindergarten personnel will receive the reimbursement. Whereas children who withdraws from the trial after baseline assessment but before the end-of-trial assessment will receive a reimbursement gift card to Fætter BR of DKK 75. Kindergarten personnel who withdraw from the trial before end-of-trial assessment will still receive the reimbursement.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
A kindergarten cluster will be eligible for study participation if the cluster meets the following criteria:
Inclusion criteria
of children and parents:
A child and parent will be eligible for study participation if they meet the following criteria:
Inclusion criteria
of kindergarten personnel:
Kindergarten personnel will be eligible for study participation if they meet the following criteria:
Exclusion criteria
A kindergarten cluster will not be eligible for the study if the cluster meets any of the following criteria:
The intervention is a 14-week nature-based program delivered during winter and designed to increase children's engagement with nature through play and learning activities. It is integrated into existing kindergarten routines and delivered by kindergarten staff, requiring minimal organizational changes. Staff will attend a workshop and receive training from a nature educator before implementation. Children in the intervention group will engage in nature-based activities at least 3 days per week for 3.5 months. Activities will primarily take place in natural areas within walking or cycling distance of the kindergarten, although occasional visits to nearby forests or beaches may be arranged using public transportation. The intervention details has been made through a co-design process.
Time frame: At baseline and at study week 14 (end-of-trial)
Completion of end-of-trial assessment, the response rate is measured by the proportion of parents who complete the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) at the end-of-trial assessment as this is our putative primary outcome measure in a future CRCT. A response rate of 80% or higher completers will give a green signal, 60-79% will give an amber signal, while less than 60% will give a red signal.
Time frame: Study week 1
Recruitment rate, defined as the proportion of children who are enrolled as participants (numerator, n) out of all those who are eligible and attending the pre-existing kindergarten groups (denominator, N). A rate of 65% or higher will give a green signal, 30-64% will give an amber signal, while less than 30% will give a red signal.
Time frame: At baseline and at study week 14 (end-of-trial)
Fidelity is defined as adherence to the intervention protocol measured by the proportion of weeks with at least three nature-based activities/outings. Weeks with national holydays will not be included. A proportion of 75% or higher will give a green signal, 50-74% will give an amber signal, while less than 50% will give a red signal. A weekly checklist of frequency and duration of nature-based activities will be filled in by the kindergarten personnel.
Time frame: At baseline and at study week 14 (end-of-trial)
Time frame: At baseline and at study week 14 (end-of-trial)
Time frame: Baseline and at 7-weeks of intervention (mid-trial)
The proportion of children willing to wear an actigraphy measuring physical activity and sleep, assessed as the proportion of children willing to wear and return the MotionWatch 8 after both baseline and mid-trial.
Time frame: At baseline and at study week 14 (end-of-trial)
Child mental well-being will be measured by the validated Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) at baseline and end-of-trial. The SDQ parent version for 4-10-year-old will be used. SDQ has 25-items and screen for child prosocial behavior and emotional and behavioral problems. For each question, the parents are asked to consider the child's behavior over the past 6 months by the following answer categories: Not True, Somewhat True or Certainly True. In the end-of-trial questionnaire, the follow-up version of the SDQ which includes not only the same 25 items, but also two additional follow-up questions for use after an intervention will be used. To increase the chance of detecting change, the follow-up versions of the SDQ ask about 'the last month', as opposed to baseline questionnaire which refers to the past 6 months.
A higher score coresponds to more difficulties.
Time frame: At baseline and at study week 14 (end-of-trial)
Child motor development measured using the motor test Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Third edition (M-ABC-3) at baseline and at end-of-trial. The test is a standardized tool used to test fine and gross motor skills with the purpose of identifying individuals with motor function impairments.
Time frame: At baseline and at study week 14 (end-of-trial)
Time frame: At baseline and study week 7 (mid-trial)
Objectively measured physical activity. Physical activity will be measured from the enrolled children using the tri-axial CamNtech MotionWare 8® for four consecutive days at baseline before the intervention starts and again at mid-trial.
Time frame: At baseline and study week 7 (mid-trial)
Objectively measured sleep, including changes in total sleep time per day for four consecutive days at baseline and at mid-trial, using actigraphy in form of the MotionWare 8.
Time frame: At baseline and study week 7 (mid-trial)
Objectively measured sleep, including changes in sleep onset latency per day for four consecutive days at baseline and at mid-trial, using actigraphy in form of the MotionWare 8.
Time frame: At baseline and study week 7 (mid-trial)
Objectively measured sleep, including changes in sleep efficiency per day for four consecutive days at baseline and at mid-trial, using actigraphy in form of the MotionWare 8.
Time frame: At baseline and study week 7 (mid-trial)
Objectively measured sleep, including changes in wake after sleep onset per day for four consecutive days at baseline and at mid-trial, using actigraphy in form of the MotionWare 8.
Time frame: At baseline and at study week 14 (end of trial)
Chronic stress will be measured by hair cortisol at baseline and end-of-trial from the 1 cm of hair from the occipital or parietal cranium closest to the scalp.
Time frame: Each Sunday from study week 1 to 14
Child sickness absence will be measured by weekly mobile texts to the parents.
Time frame: Study weeks 4, 8, 12, and 14.
Kindergarten personnel's sickness absence reported by the kindergarten personnel monthly during the intervention.
Time frame: At baseline and study week 14 (end-of-trial)
Parental stress measured by the Parental Stress Scale at baseline and end-of-trial. The standard PSS consists of 18 items, with a possible total score ranging from18 (very low parental stress) to 90 (very high parental stress).
Time frame: at study weeks 1-14
The intervention is generally considered safe, and we do not anticipate an increased risk of adverse events or reactions in the study. We will however assess the proportion of participants with any adverse event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity related to the intervention during the intervention period.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ina Olmer Specht
Other
A Feasibility Study of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Nature-based Intervention Enhancing Mental and Physical Well-being Among Kindergarten Children From Deprived Areas: Nurture by Nature
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06390683
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Behavior
Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT06353035
Behavior, Communicable Diseases
Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT06609408
Cognitive Ability, General, Frailty
Samsun, Atakum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06390878
Allergy, Asthma in Children
Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
View Trial Details