Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07775729

Prospective Study of ProteiOS in Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study evaluating Influx™ ProteiOS®, an allograft-derived growth factor product, in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Participants undergoing 1- to 2-level TLIF (L2-S1) are randomized 2:1 to receive ProteiOS or a control graft (local bone with optional cancellous chip augmentation, no ProteiOS). The primary objective is to determine whether the 12-month interbody fusion rate (assessed by CT using the Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser classification) with ProteiOS is non-inferior to control, using a 5-percentage-point non-inferiority margin. Patient-reported outcomes (ODI, VAS, EQ-5D-5L), safety, and healthcare utilization are also assessed. A separate exploratory cohort at one study site will evaluate the same outcomes in participants undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with or without ProteiOS, without formal hypothesis testing.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a widely used technique for degenerative lumbar spine pathology. Prospective, randomized evidence on fusion outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, safety, and healthcare utilization for ProteiOS in TLIF is currently limited to retrospective data. This study randomizes participants 2:1 to ProteiOS versus a within-category control (standard graft material, no ProteiOS), with central, blinded, independent radiographic review of CT and X-ray fusion outcomes. The primary endpoint is CT-confirmed interbody fusion (BSF-3) at 12 months, tested for non-inferiority (margin = 5 percentage points, assumed fusion rates 95% ProteiOS vs. 89% control, 80% power, one-sided α = 0.025, Farrington-Manning likelihood score method). Secondary endpoints include fusion at 6 and 24 months, X-ray-based interbody and posterolateral fusion assessment (Lenke classification for PLF), patient-reported outcomes at 3, 6, and 24 months, adverse events, and healthcare utilization

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-75 years, skeletally mature at time of surgery
  • Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented TLIF, with or without posterolateral fusion, as determined by the treating surgeon
  • For the ALIF study site only: degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented ALIF
  • Radiographic evidence of degenerative lumbar disease on CT, MRI, or plain radiograph (decreased disc height, herniated nucleus pulposus, ligamentum flavum/annulus hypertrophy, facet arthrosis/osteophyte, spinal canal or foraminal stenosis, or vertebral translation >3 mm)
  • Symptoms of low back pain, radiculopathy, or neurogenic claudication consistent with radiographic findings
  • Preoperative back pain ≥4 on a 0-10 VAS
  • Preoperative leg pain ≥3 on a 0-10 VAS, consistent with radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication
  • Preoperative ODI score ≥30
  • Failure of ≥6 months non-operative treatment (may be waived for progressive neurological deficit, new/worsening motor weakness, bowel/bladder dysfunction, or cauda equina syndrome)
  • Willing and able to comply with follow-up schedule and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Scheduled for surgery with synthetic bone grafts containing hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, or other radio-opaque material
  • BMI >40
  • Prior lumbar spine fusion surgery at a level currently scheduled for surgery
  • Malignancy or treatment for malignancy within the last 5 years (benign skin cancer permitted)
  • Osteoporosis/osteopenia (≤2.5 SD below age-matched mean)
  • Use of rhBMP-2 (Infuse) or other active biologics
  • Active or systemic infection, malignancy, or severe metabolic bone disease
  • Chronic steroid use (>10 days)
  • Revision fusion at index levels
  • Participation in another interventional clinical study within 30 days of consent
  • Known pregnancy or intent to become pregnant during the study

Treatment and study plan

Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®)

Other

Allograft-derived growth factor product (ProteiOS®) containing endogenous osteoinductive, angiogenic, and chemoattractant proteins bound to a scaffold of choice

Standard of Care (SOC)

Other

Local autograft with optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Fusion Success (via Computed Tomography (CT) analysis)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.

  2. Patient Reported Outcome: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Time frame: 12 Months

    Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing functional disability due to low back pain (raw score converted to a percentage, range 0-100%; 0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability; higher score = worse disability), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

  3. Patient Reported Outcome: Neurological

    Time frame: 12 Months

    Neurological status: Percentage of participants with no new or worsening neurological deficit from baseline, assessed across three components: motor function (Medical Research Council [MRC] grading scale, range 0-5, higher score indicates greater strength), sensory function (graded as intact, diminished, or absent), and deep tendon reflexes (graded as absent, diminished, normal, or hyperreflexic).

  4. Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: 12 Months

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fusion (via Computed Tomography (CT))

    Time frame: 6 and 24 months

    Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.

  2. Fusion (x ray)

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 months

    Percentage of participants achieving fusion by X-ray. Interbody fusion (all participants): Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification, Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion); success = Grade 3; higher grade = better.

  3. Adverse Events

    Time frame: 24 months

    Nature (descriptive) and frequency (number) of procedure and biologic related Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

  4. Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: 3, 6, 24 Months

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain); mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

  5. Patient Reported Outcome: Neurological

    Time frame: 3, 6, 24 Months

    Neurological status: Percentage of participants with no new or worsening neurological deficit from baseline, assessed across three components: motor function (Medical Research Council [MRC] grading scale, range 0-5, higher score indicates greater strength), sensory function (graded as intact, diminished, or absent), and deep tendon reflexes (graded as absent, diminished, normal, or hyperreflexic).

  6. Patient Reported Outcome: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Time frame: 3, 6, 24 Months

    Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing functional disability due to low back pain (raw score converted to a percentage, range 0-100%; 0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability; higher score = worse disability); mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

  7. Healthcare utilization: Frequency of Hospital Visits

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

    Number of hospital visits per participant, up to 24 months.

  8. Healthcare Utilization: Length of Hospital Stay

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

    Duration of hospital stay per participant, in days, up to 24 months.

  9. Healthcare Utilization: ICU Time

    Time frame: Up to 24 Months

    Duration of ICU stay per participant, in days, up to 24 months.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Isto Biologics

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of ProteiOS® Allograft Derived Growth Factor in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
Aug 20, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.