Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07775144

Dry Needling vs Electrical Dry Needling for Myofascial Neck Pain

Neck pain caused by myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) is common and is associated with pain, psychological distress, and kinesiophobia (fear of movement). This randomized clinical trial compared Dry Needling (DN) and Electrical Dry Needling (EDN), each delivered once weekly for six weeks, in adults with neck pain due to MTrPs. The study measured changes in pain intensity, psychological distress (depression, anxiety, stress), and kinesiophobia before and after treatment, to determine whether adding electrical stimulation to dry needling provides additional benefit over dry needling alone.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The University of Faisalabad

Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan

About this study

This randomized clinical trial was conducted at Madinah Teaching Hospital, Health 360, and Holistic Medical Care in Faisalabad. A total of 75 participants were screened; 34 met the inclusion criteria (adults aged 18-60 years with neck pain of at least 3 weeks' duration, at least one active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid, splenius capitis, or scalenes, and pain intensity of at least 4 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale) and were randomized into two equal groups using simple random sampling. Group A (n=17) received Dry Needling and Group B (n=17) received Electrical Dry Needling, one session per week for six weeks. Dry Needling used the Hong fast-in/fast-out technique to elicit local twitch responses followed by ischemic compression. Electrical Dry Needling involved needle insertion into the trigger point/taut band followed by low-frequency (2 Hz) continuous biphasic electrical current applied for 30 minutes. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and after 6 weeks using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11). One participant dropped out of each group, leaving 32 participants (16 per group) in the final analysis. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 with parametric (paired and independent samples t-tests) and nonparametric (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank, Mann-Whitney U) tests as appropriate.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-60 years of either gender.
  • Neck pain duration ≥ 3 weeks.
  • Presence of at least one active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, SCM, splenius capitis, or scalenes, confirmed using Travell and Simons' criteria.
  • Pain intensity ≥ 4 on NPRS (0-10) at baseline.
  • Ability to understand and complete questionnaires.
  • Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of cervical spine trauma, fracture, or surgery.
  • Diagnosis of neurological deficits.
  • Systemic diseases affecting muscles or joints.
  • Use of anticoagulant therapy or bleeding disorders.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Active infection or skin lesions in the cervical region.
  • Previous dry needling or electrical dry needling treatment in the past 6 months.
  • Allergy to needles or local anesthetics if used.

Treatment and study plan

dry needling

Procedure

Stainless-steel acupuncture needles inserted via guide tubes using the Hong technique (rapid insertion/withdrawal in multiple directions) to elicit up to 5 local twitch responses at the active myofascial trigger point, followed by ischemic (Travell and Simons) compression until pain decreased, repeated over several cycles for a total of 2 minutes. One session weekly for 6 weeks.

Electrical Dry Needling

Procedure

Needle inserted (after cleaning with sterile alcohol) into the diagnosed active or latent myofascial trigger point/taut band, manipulated bidirectionally to elicit pain/tingling/pressure/heaviness/warmth, then connected to a low-frequency (2 Hz) continuous biphasic electrical current at a mild-to-moderate intensity, left in place for 30 minutes. One session weekly for 6 weeks.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment) and Week 6 (post-treatment)

    Measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale where 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst pain imaginable".

Secondary outcomes

  1. Psychological Distress

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment) and Week 6 (post-treatment)

    Measured using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), covering depression, anxiety, and stress subscales.

  2. Kinesiophobia

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment) and Week 6 (post-treatment)

    Measured using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), an 11-item scale assessing fear of movement/re-injury.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Faisalabad

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Effects of Dry Needling Versus Electrical Dry Needling on Myofascial Trigger Point-Induced Neck Pain, Psychological Distress, and Kinesiophobia

Acronym: DN-EDN-NP

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 20, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.