University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
NCT Number: NCT07772596
This clinical trial studies whether an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered supportive care chatbot is helpful for addressing the supportive care needs of young adult cancer survivors. Young adult cancer survivors often experience ongoing and distressing symptoms following treatment, including extreme tiredness and lack of energy, anxiety, and difficulty sleeping. Young adult cancer survivors report a variety of strategies to self-manage these symptoms; however, there remains a gap in targeted interventions focused on the needs in young adult survivors. The AI-powered supportive care chatbot is designed to provide evidence-based information on supportive care for young adult cancer survivors. Users interact with the chatbot by entering free-text questions or selecting from predefined topics to receive tailored educational responses related to supportive care across the cancer continuum, including treatment effects, symptom management, care transitions, and life after cancer. The AI-powered supportive care chatbot may be an effective way to help address the supportive care needs of young adult cancer survivors.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–39 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Interact with AI-powered supportive care chatbot
Other names: AI Intervention, AI-based Intervention
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Time frame: At end of intervention, assessed up to 12 weeks
Acceptability will be supported if mean scores on the Acceptability E-Scale are ≥ 4 (on a 5-point scale). Will be described (i.e., means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges) at the post-intervention time point.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Demand will be demonstrated by successful recruitment of the target sample (N=30) within 12 months.
Time frame: During intervention use, assessed up to 12 weeks
Implementation will be assessed by engagement with the chatbot, defined as ≥ 70% of participants reporting at least one use per week during the initial 4-week period, rather than a fixed duration of use, given the self-directed nature of the intervention. Will be described (i.e., means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges) weekly. Given the pilot nature of the study, no hypothesis testing or formal comparisons will be conducted.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Retention will be considered feasible if ≥ 80% of participants complete 4-week assessments, and ≥ 50% elect to continue to the optional extended use period.
Time frame: At end of intervention, assessed up to 12 weeks
Usability will be supported if mean System Usability Scale scores are ≥ 70, indicating acceptable usability. Will be described (i.e., means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges) at the post-intervention time point.
Time frame: At baseline, 4 weeks, and/or 12 weeks
Will be summarized using descriptive statistics (e.g., means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges) at each time point. Changes over time (baseline, post-intervention, as applicable) will be examined descriptively.
Time frame: At baseline
Will be summarized using descriptive statistics (e.g., means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges) at the baseline time point. The Digital Health Literacy Scale is a 0 to 12 point score (based on 3 items), with higher scores indicating greater digital health care literacy.
Time frame: At end of intervention, assessed up to 12 weeks
The audio-recorded interviews will be transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription company and verified for accuracy by another study team member. The finalized transcripts will be imported into NVivo 12 (QSR International Pty Ltd). Inductive content analysis will be used to analyze the interview transcripts. Two study team members will review the transcripts and the interview guide to create an initial list of codes. Three transcripts will be independently coded using the initial codebook. After three interviews are coded, two study team members will meet to resolve any coding discrepancies and to revise the codebook further. The same process will be repeated after three more interviews are coded. After the codebook is finalized, one study team member will code the remaining interviews. Subsequently, the study team will meet as a group to review the transcripts in their entirety, making sense of the data and generating potential major themes and subthemes.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Other
Feasibility, Usability, and Acceptability of an AI-Powered MASCC Supportive Care Platform Among Young Adults With Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07235501
Graft Versus Host Disease, Graft vs Host Disease
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06827054
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07737314
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07729384
Childhood Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Childhood Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details