Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07770607

Assessing the Level of Awareness Regarding the Unique Medical Needs of the LGBTQ+ Community Among Emergency Department Physicians, as Well as Their Attitudes Toward Taking Medical Histories, Examining, and Treating Patients From This Community.

Assessing the level of knowledge and awareness regarding the unique medical needs of the LGBTQ+ community among emergency department physicians by distribution of questionnaires to all emergency department physicians (pediatric, OB/GYN, and general-internal medicine and surgery).

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–120 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Assuta Ashdod Public Hospital, Ashdod, Israel

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Emergency medical teams play a unique role in providing initial care to diverse populations, including marginalized or minority groups. Implicit prejudice can influence the interactions of emergency personnel and contribute to a lack of trust in healthcare providers among some members of the LGBTQ+ community. Previous studies have highlighted a lack of LGBTQ-focused education tailored to the specific needs of emergency department staff, with 83%-85% of such personnel reporting a deficiency in knowledge and practical tools. This lack of training begins during medical school and persists as students advance to residency and internship. Medical students, residents, and fellows have reported significantly lower levels of comfort in taking sexual histories and managing sexual health issues among the LGBTQ population. Moll et al. surveyed 319 emergency medicine residents in the United States. A significant minority of respondents felt that taking a medical history and performing physical examinations were more challenging with gay, lesbian, or bisexual patients (24.6%) and even more so with transgender patients (42.6%). The majority of residents (63%) do not ask patients about their sexual orientation when they present with abdominal pain or genital complaints. Reports of LGBT-phobic and discriminatory comments came from both fellow residents (16.6%) and faculty members (10%). Additionally, 2.5% of respondents felt uncomfortable working alongside other physicians from the LGBTQ community, and 6% did not agree that LGBTQ patients deserve the same quality of care as others. Training healthcare teams provides information and enhances skills, potentially leading to improved quality of care for LGBTQ individuals. Intervention programs report short-term improvements in the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare students and professionals regarding sexual and LGBTQ-specific healthcare. However, a unified conceptual model for training-covering duration, content, and methodology-has been, and remains, lacking. We aim to Assessing the level of knowledge and awareness regarding the unique medical needs of the LGBTQ+ community among emergency department physicians by distribution of questionnaires to all emergency department physicians (pediatric, OB/GYN, and general-internal medicine and surgery).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ER physicians

Exclusion criteria

  • None

Treatment and study plan

Distribution of Questionnaires

Other

Distribution of questionnaires to all emergency department physicians (pediatric, OB/GYN, and general-internal medicine and surgery).

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessing awareness level

    Time frame: 30 days

    Assessing the level of knowledge and awareness regarding the unique medical needs of the LGBTQ+ community among emergency department physicians by assessing the extent of physicians' knowledge regarding the unique medical needs of the LGBTQ+ community. Using adjusted questionnaire from previous trials (Moll et al 2018). Range of score 7 (min) to 35 (max).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessing comfort level in anamneses and physical examination

    Time frame: 30 days

    Assessing the sense of comfort of physicians to conduct a comprehensive sexual history when appropriate for the reason for the visit; assessing the sense of comfort regarding physical examinations involving the genital area among both the general and LGBTQ+ populations; and assessing physicians' comfort level in working alongside LGBTQ+ colleagues. Using an adjusted questionnaire from previous trials (Moll et al 2018), with a range from 20 (min) to 100 (max).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Daniel Leshin Carmel, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+972525253037

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Barzilai Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 18, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 18, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.