Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most prevalent chronic musculoskeletal disorders and a leading cause of pain, disability, reduced mobility, and impaired quality of life worldwide. Conventional medical management primarily focuses on reducing pain and improving function through pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, whereas Ayurvedic management utilizes a holistic approach incorporating herbal medications and external therapeutic procedures. Although both treatment approaches are widely practiced, comparative evidence evaluating conventional medical care, Ayurvedic care, and an integrated treatment approach remains limited. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of these three treatment strategies in individuals with early knee osteoarthritis.
This study is a single-center, three-arm, open-label randomized controlled trial in which 300 participants aged 30-65 years with primary knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-II) will be randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive standard medical care, Ayurvedic care, or integrated care. Participants will be followed for 24 weeks after randomization. Baseline assessments will include demographic characteristics, clinical examination, radiographic evaluation, and laboratory investigations.
Participants allocated to the Standard Medical Care group will receive oral paracetamol, topical diclofenac spray, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and superficial heat or cold therapy.
Participants allocated to the Ayurvedic Care group will receive Trayodashang Guggulu, Ashwagandha Churna, Janubasti therapy, and topical application of Mahanarayana Taila.
Participants allocated to the Integrated Care group will receive Trayodashang Guggulu, Ashwagandha Churna, topical diclofenac spray, and portable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
The primary objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the three treatment approaches in reducing knee pain, improving knee osteoarthritis symptoms, reducing joint inflammation, and improving gait. Primary outcome measures include changes in knee pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), knee osteoarthritis symptoms assessed using the CRD Pune version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), knee joint surface temperature assessed using infrared thermography, and gait kinematic parameters assessed using three-dimensional gait analysis. Outcome assessments will be performed at baseline and during follow-up according to the study schedule.
Secondary outcome measures include changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) to evaluate systemic inflammation associated with the three treatment approaches.
The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of integrated care, standard medical care, and Ayurvedic care in improving pain, physical function, joint inflammation, gait, and quality of life among individuals with early knee osteoarthritis. The results may contribute to the development of evidence-based integrative treatment strategies for the management of early knee osteoarthritis.