Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies (865) 974-3340 [email protected]
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996-2700, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07768670
The purpose of this research is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and preliminary efficacy of a wearable and artificial intelligence-driven mobile application-based exercise prescription grounded in self-determination theory (SDT) and behavioral change techniques (BCTs) among older adults. As no data exists on the feasibility of AI-driven exercise programs grounded in SDT and multiple BCTs specifically for older adults, this will be a pioneering study to explore the feasibility of wearable and AI-driven exercise program protocols and the rates of acceptance and appropriateness of the exercise prescription intervention among older adults. In addition, this study will test the preliminary efficacy of the intervention on physical activity (PA), mental health, and quality of life. This study follows the National Institute of Health (NIH) stage model, and it represents stage 1b of the NIH stage model, which emphasizes the feasibility and actionable processes for delivering a new health intervention. Specifically, this study will: 1.Evaluate the research protocol feasibility of a wearable and AI-driven mobile application-based exercise prescription grounded in SDT and BCTs (of goal setting, self-monitoring, graded task, and demonstration) on older adults over 8 weeks 2. Evaluate the acceptability and appropriateness of a wearable, AI-driven, mobile application-based exercise prescription grounded in SDT and BCTs among older adults over 8 weeks. 3. Evaluate the preliminary impact of a wearable and AI-driven mobile application-based exercise prescription grounded in SDT and BCTs on older adult PA (steps per day and daily duration of light PA and Moderate-vigorous PA), sedentary time, sleep, mental health (depression and anxiety), and quality of life.
Interested in participating?
Request Info65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996-2700, United States
Location status: Recruiting
By the late 2070s, the global population aged 65 and older is projected to reach 2.2 billion, surpassing the number of children under age 18. In 2020, about 1 in 6 people in the United States (U.S) were age 65 and over, compared to less than 1 in 20 in 1920. The number of U.S. adults 65 years and over is projected to increase to 82 million by 2050, with the older group's share of the total population projected to rise to 23%. Ageing brings about an increased vulnerability to mental health challenges, and chronic conditions such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and Alzheimer's. Among adults ages 65 and older, more than 90% have at least one chronic condition and 88% have at least one multiple chronic condition. Chronic conditions contribute to over 75% of healthcare expenditures for individuals aged 65 and above in the U.S, amounting to over $1.5 trillion. An active lifestyle reduces the likelihood of developing chronic diseases and also enhances the overall health outcomes of the older adult population. Despite these benefits, a majority of older adults fail to meet the recommended U.S. physical activity guidelines (150 minutes of moderate intensity PA a week).
Mobile health (mHealth) technologies-such as smartphone applications (apps), wearables, and other mobile devices-have emerged as an increasingly adopted tool for promoting health among older adults. Several studies have demonstrated the potential of mHealth technologies to increase PA, reduce sedentary time, and improve health outcomes. However, findings have shown that the sustainability of mHealth-based exercise interventions remains uncertain. Recent reviews also emphasized the need for more personalized, adaptable mHealth solutions tailored to older adults' unique health conditions and physical ability to ensure better engagement and more durable behavior change. While recent studies show that personalized mHealth-based exercise programs outperform one-size-fits-all approaches, yet their impact is constrained by insufficient personalization data, low adherence, limited scalability, and inadequate integration of behavior-change techniques (BCTs).
Emerging evidence suggests that Artificial Intelligence (AI) can enhance PA. Integrating AI with mHealth tools-such as smartphone apps and wearable devices grounded in BCTs-offers a promising pathway to deliver an automated exercise program tailored to each person's PA goals, health status, and overall well-being, reaching many people at once with the potential of helping older adults adhere longer to an active lifestyle. Such an approach aligns with the growing emphasis on precision health and scalable interventions for aging populations. Despite this promise, the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness and preliminary impact of an AI-driven, personalized exercise program delivered through mHealth and grounded in SDT and BCTs on older adults' PA and health outcomes remain unexplored.
The purpose of this research is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and preliminary efficacy of a wearable and artificial intelligence-driven mobile application-based exercise prescription grounded in self-determination theory (SDT) and behavioral change techniques (BCTs) among older
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
All participants will be provided the researcher-developed sFitRx mHealth application. sFitRx will provide participants with an established daily and weekly exercise prescription program based on each participant's: (1) daily step goals, (2) previous week's PA, as collected by the Fitbit Flex 2; and (3) current physical conditioning and well-being, as collected by sFitRx. The sFitRx will provide participants with a video demonstration of warm up exercise and all prescribed exercise types, including aerobics, resistance, balance, and flexibility exercises. These exercises follow a graded task BCT. The exercise program delivered by the sFitRx app is grounded in self-determination theory, most especially in satisfying the basic psychological needs that drive intrinsic motivation.
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Number screened/month per recruitment method
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Number excluded by criterion; Number that decline participation; Reason for declining participation (open-ended); Average time from screening to enrollment (minutes/hours/days/month).
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) - Follow up (Week 10)
Number dropouts from AI-based exercise intervention; Reason for dropout (open-ended).
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) - Follow up (Week 10)
Number that completed the intervention program
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) - Follow up (Week 10)
Percentage of the exercise program completed weekly (%)
Time frame: At follow up (week 10)
Intervention Feasibility (ease of delivery). will be assessed using the Weiner et al. (2017)1 validated questionnaire for the feasibility of intervention measure (FIM). This questionnaire contains 4-item questions on a 5-point Likert scale (completely disagree [1]-completely agree [5]), with a score range of 1-5. Intervention Acceptability (assessing participant satisfaction). will be obtained after the intervention (8 weeks) on a 1-5 Likert scale of 4-item questions, including "The exercise program delivered by the app meets my approval" using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) by Weiner et al., 20171. Appropriateness (perceived fit for rural older adults). will be assessed using the Weiner et al., 20171 intervention appropriateness measure (IAM). The IAM is on 1-5 Likert scale of 4-item questions, including "The exercise program seems fitting", "The exercise program seems suitable". The AIM and IAM are robust, with Cronbach alphas of 0.89 and 0.87, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and Follow up (week 10)
Fitbit Flex 2 will be used to assess participants' daily steps
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and Follow up (Week 10)
We will use the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly to assess PA across leisure (6-item question), household (3-item question), and occupational domains (1-item question) over the past 7 days. Higher scores means more physical activity. (Low activity: <100; Moderate: 100-250; High: >250)
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and Follow up (week 10)
Depression will be measured using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), a 8-item symptom severity rating scale for depression (Kroenke et al., 2009). PHQ-8 is a validated diagnostic and severity measure of symptoms of depressive disorders.
Adults with scores of 0-4 are considered to have no or minimal symptoms of depression.
Score 5-9 are considered mild symptom Score 10-14 are considered moderate symptom Score 15-24 are considered severe symptom
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and Follow up (week 10)
Anxiety will be assessed using the Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS). GAS is a 10-item rating scale on a 4-Likert Scale (Not at all [0] to All of the time [3]). Item 1 through 10 are summed to provide a total score. The higher the score, the worse the anxiety outcome.
Score 1-6 are considered minimal symptom Score 7-9 are considered mild symptom Score 10 is considered moderate Score 12-30 are considered severe symptom
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and Follow up (week 10)
Quality of life (QoL) will be assessed using the Older Adult Quality of Life Scale.
Each of the 13 items is scored Strongly agree=1, Agree=2, Neither=3, Disagree=4, Strongly disagree=5. The items are summed for a total OPQOL-Brief score, then positive items are reverse coded, so that higher scores represented higher QoL.
Minimum: 13 (very poor quality of life) Maximum: 65 (excellent quality of life)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Other
Artificial Intelligence-based Personalized Exercise Prescription Through Mobile Health on Physical Activity and Health Outcomes in Older Adults: A Feasibility Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06667661
24-Hour Movement Guidelines, Adherence Interventions
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07266740
Acceptability, Anxiety
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07681765
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Aarhus, Region Midt, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07655232
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details