Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07765758

Prospective Evaluation of Stapled Intact-Duodenum Bipartition With Sleeve Gastrectomy (SIBS)

Obesity is a chronic disease that can be treated with metabolic and bariatric surgery when appropriate. This study will prospectively evaluate a new laparoscopic bariatric procedure called Stapled Intact-Duodenum Bipartition with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SIBS).

SIBS combines sleeve gastrectomy with a side-to-side connection between the first part of the duodenum and the ileum. Unlike standard single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S), the duodenum is not divided. Instead, the new connection is created while the duodenum remains intact, allowing food to continue through the normal duodenal pathway while also providing an additional pathway to the ileum. The connection is created laparoscopically using a conventional linear surgical stapler.

The main purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the technical feasibility and short-term safety of the SIBS procedure in adults undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery. The study will assess whether the planned procedure can be completed successfully and will record postoperative complications occurring within 30 days after surgery.

Participants will also be followed after surgery to evaluate weight loss, changes in body mass index, glycemic control and other obesity-associated medical conditions, nutritional status, gastrointestinal symptoms, hospital readmission, reoperation, and procedure-related complications. Follow-up assessments are planned for up to 12 months after surgery.

The study is intended to provide prospective evidence regarding the safety, feasibility, and early clinical outcomes of this surgical approach. Longer-term and comparative studies will be needed to determine how its outcomes compare with established metabolic and bariatric procedures

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Division of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Medical City for Military and Security Services

Muscat, 111, Oman

Location contact

Jasper Viloria, MD, FICS

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Mohammed Al Sibani, MD, FRCSC

CONTACT

[email protected]

+96899360515

Mohammed Al Sibani, MD, FRCSC

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mohsin Alriyami, MD, OMSB

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ruzdi Farouk, MBBS, MRCS

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Wael Arba, MD, DEMS GS ALG

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Younis Al-Mufargi, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

This is a prospective, single-arm, open-label interventional study evaluating Stapled Intact-Duodenum Bipartition with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SIBS) in adults undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery.

Standard single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) combines sleeve gastrectomy with transection of the proximal duodenum and creation of a duodenoileal anastomosis. SIBS modifies this anatomical configuration by preserving continuity of the duodenum and creating a side-to-side duodenoileal anastomosis without duodenal transection. The rationale for this approach is to establish a duodenoileal pathway while avoiding creation of a blind-ending duodenal stump and maintaining continuity of the native proximal intestinal pathway. Whether these anatomical differences translate into clinically meaningful differences in safety, weight loss, metabolic outcomes, nutritional outcomes, or gastrointestinal function requires prospective evaluation.

The procedure is performed laparoscopically. Sleeve gastrectomy is performed using standard bariatric surgical principles. An ileal loop is then identified at a protocol-defined distance proximal to the ileocecal valve and brought ante-colically to the first portion of the duodenum in an isoperistaltic orientation. Small enterotomies are created in the duodenum and ileum, and a conventional laparoscopic linear stapler is used to construct a side-to-side duodenoileal anastomosis. The common enterotomy is closed laparoscopically. The duodenum is not transected, thereby maintaining continuity of the native pyloro-duodenojejunal pathway in addition to the newly created duodenoileal pathway. Anastomotic integrity is assessed intraoperatively before completion of the procedure.

The primary objectives of the study are to assess technical feasibility and short-term safety. Technical feasibility will be evaluated by successful laparoscopic completion of the planned SIBS procedure with creation of the side-to-side duodenoileal anastomosis while preserving an intact duodenum and without conversion to an alternative bariatric procedure or open surgery. Short-term safety will be evaluated by prospectively recording major postoperative complications occurring within 30 days after surgery.

Perioperative outcomes will include operative time, estimated blood loss, conversion, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, unplanned intervention, readmission, reoperation, and mortality. Particular attention will be given to complications potentially related to the duodenoileal anastomosis, including anastomotic leak, bleeding, obstruction, stenosis, ulceration, intra-abdominal collection, and other gastrointestinal complications.

Participants will undergo standardized postoperative clinical and laboratory follow-up for up to 12 months. Weight-related outcomes will include body weight, body mass index (BMI), percentage total weight loss (%TWL), and percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) at predefined postoperative time points. Metabolic assessment will include glycemic measures such as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and changes in treatment requirements among participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes. Changes in other obesity-associated medical conditions, including hypertension and dyslipidemia, will also be documented where applicable.

Nutritional follow-up will include clinically appropriate laboratory assessment of hematological, protein, mineral, and micronutrient parameters according to the institutional metabolic and bariatric surgery follow-up protocol. Gastrointestinal symptoms and clinically relevant postoperative events will be prospectively recorded throughout follow-up.

Where specified in the final study protocol, postoperative imaging may be used to assess anastomotic patency and passage of contrast through the native duodenojejunal and duodenoileal pathways. Any imaging or metabolic investigations performed specifically for research purposes will be predefined in the approved study protocol.

The study is designed as an initial prospective evaluation of the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of SIBS. It is not designed to establish superiority or noninferiority to SADI-S, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or other established bariatric procedures. Findings from this study are intended to inform subsequent larger and comparative studies evaluating the longer-term effectiveness, metabolic effects, nutritional consequences, and safety of the procedure.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years.
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m², regardless of the presence or severity of obesity-associated medical conditions; or BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m² with type 2 diabetes mellitus or another clinically significant obesity-associated medical condition and inadequate weight loss or improvement following appropriate nonsurgical management.
  • Eligible for metabolic and bariatric surgery following multidisciplinary clinical assessment.
  • Considered suitable for laparoscopic Stapled Intact-Duodenum Bipartition with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SIBS) based on preoperative assessment.
  • For primary procedures, no previous metabolic or bariatric surgical procedure.
  • For revisional procedures, previous sleeve gastrectomy with a clinical indication for revisional metabolic/bariatric surgery and anatomy considered suitable for SIBS.
  • Able to understand the investigational nature of the SIBS procedure, its potential risks and benefits, and established alternative bariatric procedures.
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
  • Willing and able to comply with the scheduled postoperative clinical, nutritional, laboratory, and study follow-up for at least 12 months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Age <18 years or >65 years.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Planned pregnancy during the 12-month postoperative study period.
  • Contraindication to general anesthesia or laparoscopic metabolic/bariatric surgery.
  • Previous gastrointestinal surgery resulting in anatomy that precludes safe performance of the planned SIBS procedure, except previous sleeve gastrectomy in participants undergoing an eligible revisional procedure.
  • Intraoperative anatomy that prevents safe creation of a tension-free side-to-side duodenoileal anastomosis.
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease involving the small intestine.
  • Active gastrointestinal malignancy or other active malignancy for which the proposed operation or follow-up would be inappropriate.
  • Severe hepatic dysfunction, severe renal dysfunction, or another major systemic illness considered to confer an unacceptable operative or nutritional risk.
  • Pre-existing severe protein-calorie malnutrition or clinically significant nutritional deficiency that cannot be adequately corrected before surgery.
  • Active gastrointestinal ulceration or another gastrointestinal condition considered to substantially increase the risk of the planned procedure.
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric illness or cognitive impairment that precludes valid informed consent or adherence to postoperative care.
  • Active alcohol or substance use disorder considered incompatible with safe metabolic and bariatric surgery.
  • Inability or unwillingness to adhere to postoperative dietary recommendations, nutritional supplementation, or scheduled follow-up.
  • Any medical, surgical, anatomical, or psychosocial condition that, in the judgment of the multidisciplinary bariatric team, makes participation or performance of SIBS inappropriate or unsafe.

Treatment and study plan

Stapled Intact-Duodenum Bipartition With Sleeve Gastrectomy (SIBS)

Procedure

SIBS is a laparoscopic metabolic and bariatric procedure combining sleeve gastrectomy with a side-to-side duodenoileal anastomosis without duodenal transection. Following sleeve gastrectomy, an ileal loop at a protocol-defined distance from the ileocecal valve is brought ante-colically to the first portion of the duodenum. Small enterotomies are created in the duodenum and ileum, and a conventional laparoscopic linear stapler is used to construct the side-to-side anastomosis. The common enterotomy is closed laparoscopically. The duodenum remains intact, preserving the native pyloro-duodenojejunal pathway while creating an additional duodenoileal pathway. Anastomotic integrity is assessed intraoperatively before completion of the procedure.

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants With Successful Technical Completion of the SIBS Procedure

    Time frame: During the index surgical procedure

    Technical success is defined as successful laparoscopic completion of the planned Stapled Intact-Duodenum Bipartition with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SIBS), including creation of the side-to-side duodenoileal anastomosis with preservation of an intact, non-transected duodenum, without conversion to open surgery or conversion to an alternative bariatric procedure. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants who meet all criteria for technical success.

  2. Proportion of Participants With Major Postoperative Complications Within 30 Days

    Time frame: From the day of surgery through postoperative day 30

    Major postoperative morbidity will be defined as the occurrence of one or more complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher within 30 days after surgery. This includes complications requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention; life-threatening complications requiring intensive care management; and death. Events of particular interest include anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal collection, gastrointestinal bleeding, bowel obstruction, unplanned reoperation, and unplanned endoscopic or radiological intervention. Results will be reported as the number and percentage of participants experiencing at least one major complication.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage Total Weight Loss (%TWL) at 12 Months

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

    Percentage total weight loss will be calculated as: %TWL = [(preoperative weight - postoperative weight) / preoperative weight] × 100. The mean %TWL and corresponding measures of variability will be reported for participants with available 12-month follow-up data.

  2. Percentage Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) at 12 Months

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

    Percentage excess weight loss will be calculated as: %EWL = [(preoperative weight - postoperative weight) / (preoperative weight - ideal body weight)] × 100. Ideal body weight will be defined using the prespecified method in the study protocol. The mean %EWL and corresponding measures of variability will be reported.

  3. Change in Body Mass Index From Baseline to 12 Months

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months after surgery

    Body mass index (BMI) will be calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m²). Change in BMI will be calculated as 12-month postoperative BMI minus preoperative BMI and reported as the mean change with corresponding measures of variability.

  4. Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to 12 Months

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months after surgery

    Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) will be measured before surgery and at 12 months after surgery. Change in HbA1c will be calculated as the 12-month value minus the baseline value and reported in percentage points. Analyses will be performed for participants with available paired measurements, with additional assessment among participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes where appropriate.

  5. Proportion of Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Remission at 12 Months

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

    Among participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline, remission will be assessed at 12 months using prespecified consensus criteria. Remission will be defined as HbA1c <6.5% persisting for at least 3 months in the absence of glucose-lowering pharmacotherapy. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with baseline type 2 diabetes who meet the remission criteria.

  6. Operative Time

    Time frame: During the index surgical procedure

    Total operative time for the SIBS procedure will be recorded in minutes according to the prespecified operative start and completion points and summarized using appropriate measures of central tendency and variability.

  7. Estimated Intraoperative Blood Loss

    Time frame: During the index surgical procedure

    Estimated blood loss during the index surgical procedure will be recorded in milliliters and summarized using appropriate measures of central tendency and variability.

  8. Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay

    Time frame: From the day of surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days

    Postoperative hospital length of stay will be measured from the date of the index operation until hospital discharge and reported in days using appropriate measures of central tendency and variability.

  9. Proportion of Participants With Unplanned Hospital Readmission Within 30 Days

    Time frame: From hospital discharge through postoperative day 30

    Any unplanned hospital readmission occurring within 30 days after the index SIBS procedure will be recorded. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with at least one unplanned readmission.

  10. Proportion of Participants Requiring Unplanned Reoperation Within 30 Days

    Time frame: From the day of surgery through postoperative day 30

    Any unplanned surgical reoperation related to the index procedure occurring within 30 days after SIBS will be recorded. The indication and type of reoperation will also be documented. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants requiring at least one unplanned reoperation.

  11. Proportion of Participants With Duodenoileal Anastomotic Leak Within 30 Days

    Time frame: From the day of surgery through postoperative day 30

    Duodenoileal anastomotic leak will be defined as clinically, radiologically, endoscopically, or surgically confirmed leakage from the duodenoileal anastomosis. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with a confirmed anastomotic leak within 30 days after surgery.

  12. Proportion of Participants With Duodenoileal Anastomotic Stenosis

    Time frame: From surgery through 12 months after surgery

    Duodenoileal anastomotic stenosis will be defined as symptomatic narrowing of the anastomosis confirmed by upper gastrointestinal imaging or endoscopy and/or requiring therapeutic intervention. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with confirmed stenosis.

  13. Proportion of Participants With Duodenoileal Anastomotic Ulceration

    Time frame: From surgery through 12 months after surgery

    Clinically suspected anastomotic ulceration will be investigated according to standard clinical practice. Confirmed ulceration involving the duodenoileal anastomosis will be recorded when demonstrated endoscopically. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with confirmed anastomotic ulceration.

  14. Change in Selected Nutritional Laboratory Parameters From Baseline to 12 Months

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months after surgery

    Nutritional status will be assessed using prespecified laboratory parameters including hemoglobin, serum albumin, ferritin, vitamin B12, folate, calcium, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Values will be measured at baseline and 12 months after surgery. Absolute change from baseline will be calculated separately for each laboratory parameter and summarized using appropriate measures of central tendency and variability.

Other outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants With Contrast Passage Through Both Gastrointestinal Pathways

    Time frame: At protocol-specified postoperative contrast imaging, within 3 months after surgery

    In participants undergoing protocol-specified postoperative upper gastrointestinal contrast imaging, passage of contrast through the native pyloro-duodenojejunal pathway and through the side-to-side duodenoileal pathway will be assessed. Dual-pathway patency will be defined as visualization of contrast passage through both routes without evidence of anastomotic obstruction. The number and percentage of evaluable participants demonstrating dual-pathway passage will be reported.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mohammed Al Sibani, MD, FRCSC

CONTACT

[email protected]

0096899360515 ext. 0096899360515

Younis Al-Mufargi, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

0096895622838 ext. 0096895622838

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical City for Military and Security Services

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Safety, Feasibility, and Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Side-to-Side Duodenoileal Bipartition Without Duodenal Transection Using a Conventional Linear Stapler: A Prospective Interventional Study

Acronym: SIBS

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Aug 14, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.