Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07765576

Ex Vivo Thermal Damage Assessment During Electrocautery Cutting of Explanted Biopolymer-Infiltrated Tissue

This prospective ex vivo study will evaluate thermal damage produced during electrocautery cutting of explanted tissue from patients undergoing clinically indicated surgical removal of gluteal biopolymers. The study will focus on three tissue types: fat flap tissue, fibrotic tissue, and muscular tissue.

The clinical surgical procedure will not be modified by study participation. All experimental thermal measurements will be performed on tissue that has already been removed from the patient as part of standard surgical care.

In fat tissue, standardized blocks measuring 1.25 cm × 1 cm × 1 cm will be prepared from the explanted specimen. Thermal measurements will be performed for each combination of electrocautery tip, power setting, and electrosurgical mode. The evaluated tips will be a blunt electrocautery tip and a Utah electrocautery tip. The evaluated power settings will be 25 watts and 50 watts. The evaluated modes will be cut Blend 2 and coagulation. For each combination, three thermal measurements will be obtained.

In fibrotic and muscular tissue, due to limited tissue availability, the evaluation will be restricted to 25 watts using the blunt and Utah tips in cut Blend 2 and coagulation modes. Thermal measurements will be obtained from electrocautery cuts performed during removal of the clinically indicated specimen.

Thermal measurements will be recorded using a FLIR C3-X thermal camera. The camera settings will include emissivity of 0.95, reflected temperature of 20°C, operating room humidity of 57%, operating room temperature of 22°C, and a fixed measurement distance of 50 cm.

Histopathological evaluation will be performed on one representative sample per experimental combination. The pathology assessor will be blinded to the electrocautery tip, power setting, and mode used for each coded sample. The primary outcome will be maximum histological depth of thermal damage.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Clinica Bioderma

Medellín, Antioquia, 050022, Colombia

Location contact

Edison Osorio, MD, Plastic surgeon

CONTACT

[email protected]

+57 314 8644099

Edison Osorio, MD, plastic surgery

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Injection of biopolymers or alloplastic filler materials into soft tissues may result in chronic inflammation, fibrosis, foreign body reaction, granuloma formation, migration, pain, deformity, and functional impairment. In selected patients, surgical removal of affected tissue is clinically indicated.

Electrocautery is commonly used during surgical dissection and tissue handling. However, the thermal behavior of biopolymer-infiltrated tissues and the relative thermal damage produced by different electrocautery tips, power settings, and electrosurgical modes have not been adequately characterized.

This study is designed as a prospective ex vivo evaluation of thermal damage in tissue already removed from patients undergoing clinically indicated surgical removal of gluteal biopolymers. The study does not alter the surgical indication, surgical approach, extent of resection, intraoperative dissection strategy, anesthesia, hemostasis, or postoperative care.

The study will evaluate three tissue types:

Fat flap tissue. Fibrotic tissue. Muscular tissue.

Fat tissue will be evaluated using standardized blocks measuring 1.25 cm × 1 cm × 1 cm, obtained from the surgically removed specimen. For fat tissue, the experimental design will include two electrocautery tips, two power settings, and two electrosurgical modes:

Blunt tip, 25 watts, cut Blend 2. Blunt tip, 25 watts, coagulation. Blunt tip, 50 watts, cut Blend 2. Blunt tip, 50 watts, coagulation. Utah tip, 25 watts, cut Blend 2. Utah tip, 25 watts, coagulation. Utah tip, 50 watts, cut Blend 2. Utah tip, 50 watts, coagulation.

For each of the eight fat-tissue combinations, three thermal measurements will be performed. Therefore, each participant may contribute up to 24 fat-tissue thermal measurements when sufficient fat tissue is available.

Histopathological samples will not be repeated for each thermal repetition. Instead, one representative histopathology sample will be submitted for each experimental combination, resulting in up to eight fat-tissue pathology samples per participant.

Fibrotic and muscular tissue will be evaluated only when included in the clinically indicated surgical specimen. Because these tissues are more limited, the experimental assessment will be restricted to 25 watts. For each tissue type, the following four combinations will be evaluated when tissue availability allows:

Blunt tip, 25 watts, cut Blend 2. Blunt tip, 25 watts, coagulation. Utah tip, 25 watts, cut Blend 2. Utah tip, 25 watts, coagulation.

For fibrotic and muscular tissue, three thermal measurements per combination will be performed when feasible. One representative pathology sample per combination will be submitted. These specimens will not be prepared as standardized small blocks; instead, pathology will assess thermal damage from the electrocautery cut margins or surfaces of the tissue removed from the patient during the clinically indicated procedure.

All thermal measurements will include:

Baseline temperature before electrocautery activation. Maximum temperature during electrocautery cutting. Temperature 10 seconds after cutting. Temperature 30 seconds after cutting.

Thermal measurements will be obtained using a FLIR C3-X thermal camera under standardized conditions. The thermal camera will be positioned at a fixed distance of 50 cm from the tissue. The emissivity setting will be 0.95. Reflected temperature will be set at 20°C. Operating room humidity will be recorded as 57%, and operating room temperature will be recorded as 22°C.

All pathology samples will be coded alphabetically before submission to the pathology assessor. The pathology assessor will remain blinded to the electrocautery tip, power setting, and electrosurgical mode used for each sample. The coding key will be stored separately by the principal investigator or study coordinator and will not be provided to the pathology assessor.

The primary objective is to determine which electrocautery tip, power setting, and electrosurgical mode are associated with lower thermal damage in explanted biopolymer-infiltrated tissue.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with clinical and/or imaging diagnosis of gluteal soft tissue infiltration by biopolymers or alloplastic filler material.
  • Patients scheduled for clinically indicated surgical removal of gluteal biopolymer-infiltrated tissue.
  • Ability to understand the study and provide written informed consent.
  • Availability of explanted tissue suitable for ex vivo thermal and histopathological assessment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.
  • Intraoperative finding that explanted tissue is insufficient for ex vivo thermal assessment.
  • Active severe infection requiring urgent deviation from the planned surgical protocol.
  • Extensive tissue necrosis or contamination preventing standardized ex vivo thermal assessment.
  • Specimens that cannot be processed within the predefined time window after explantation.
  • Any situation in which the surgeon determines that research handling of the specimen could interfere with clinical care, pathology required for patient management, or institutional tissue handling policies.
  • Lack of adequate thermographic recording due to technical failure.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Histological Depth of Thermal Damage

    Time frame: At histopathological assessment after ex vivo electrocautery cutting, day 0, the same day that the surgery

    Maximum depth of thermal tissue damage measured from the electrocautery cut margin to viable tissue on histopathological examination. The measurement will be recorded in micrometers or millimeters. Thermal damage may include coagulative necrosis, carbonization, collagen retraction, architectural distortion, vascular wall injury, and loss of tissue architecture.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximum Temperature During Electrocautery Cutting

    Time frame: During each ex vivo electrocautery cut. Day 0, during the surgical procedure

    Highest temperature recorded during each ex vivo electrocautery cut using the FLIR C3-X thermal camera.

  2. Temperature 10 Seconds After Electrocautery Cutting

    Time frame: 10 seconds after each ex vivo electrocautery cut. Day 0, during the surgical procedure

    Tissue temperature recorded 10 seconds after completion of each ex vivo electrocautery cut.

  3. Temperature 30 Seconds After Electrocautery Cutting

    Time frame: 30 seconds after each ex vivo electrocautery cut. Day 0, during the surgical procedure

    Tissue temperature recorded 30 seconds after completion of each ex vivo electrocautery cut.

  4. Histological Carbonization Score

    Time frame: At histopathological assessment after ex vivo electrocautery cutting. day 0, the same day that the surgery

    Degree of carbonization at the electrocautery cut margin, classified as absent, mild, moderate, or severe by histopathological assessment.

  5. Histological Coagulative Necrosis

    Time frame: At histopathological assessment after ex vivo electrocautery cutting. day 0, the same day that the surgery

    Presence and extent of coagulative necrosis adjacent to the electrocautery cut margin, assessed histologically and classified as absent, mild, moderate, or severe.

  6. Collagen Retraction Score

    Time frame: At histopathological assessment after ex vivo electrocautery cutting. day 0, the same day that the surgery

    Histological degree of collagen retraction adjacent to the electrocautery cut margin, classified as absent, mild, moderate, or severe.

  7. Tissue Calcification Grade

    Time frame: At histopathological assessment after ex vivo electrocautery cuttin. day 0, the same day that the surgery

    Histological grade of tissue calcification, classified as absent, mild, moderate, or severe.

  8. Thermal Damage According to Electrocautery Tip

    Time frame: During ex vivo testing and at histopathological assessment. day 0, the same day that the surgery

    Comparison of thermographic and histological thermal damage between blunt and Utah electrocautery tips

  9. Thermal Damage According to Power Setting

    Time frame: During ex vivo testing and at histopathological assessment. day 0, the same day that the surgery

    Comparison of thermographic and histological thermal damage between 25-watt and 50-watt power settings in fat tissue.

  10. Thermal Damage According to Electrosurgical Mode

    Time frame: During ex vivo testing and at histopathological assessment. day 0, the same day that the surgery

    Comparison of thermographic and histological thermal damage between cut Blend 2 and coagulation modes.

  11. Correlation Between Thermographic Measurements and Histological Thermal Damage

    Time frame: From ex vivo thermal assessment to histopathological assessmen. day 0, the same day that the surgery

    Correlation between thermal measurements, including baseline temperature, maximum temperature during cutting, temperature at 10 seconds, and temperature at 30 seconds, and maximum histological depth of thermal damage.

Other outcomes

  1. Baseline Tissue Temperature

    Time frame: Immediately before each ex vivo electrocautery cut. day 0, the same day that the surgery

    Temperature of the tissue sample immediately before electrocautery activation, measured using the FLIR C3-X thermal camera.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Edison Osorio, MD, Plastic surgeon

CONTACT

[email protected]

+57 314 8644099

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Research Inc

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Ex Vivo Evaluation of Thermal Damage in Explanted Fat, Fibrotic, and Muscular Tissue From Patients Undergoing Surgical Removal of Gluteal Biopolymers Using Blunt Versus Utah Electrocautery Tips

Acronym: THERM-BIOPOL

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 14, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.