Unilateral Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy
Device1st side Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy for Parkinson's Disease
NCT Number: NCT07764874
This study is a randomized clinical trial evaluating a focused ultrasound treatment for people with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) who have disabling motor complications and symptoms.
The study uses the Exablate Neuro System, which delivers MR-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS). This technology focuses ultrasound energy on a specific brain target and generates heat to create a small lesion (ablation) without making a surgical incision.
The target in this study is the Pallidothalamic Tract (PTT), a pathway involved in the abnormal brain circuits that contribute to Parkinson's symptoms and complications.
This study is evaluating whether treating one side of the brain or treating both sides (in separate procedures) provides better outcomes for people with advanced Parkinson's disease who have motor complications and symptoms.
The main outcome measure is the change in the MDS-UPDRS Part III Upper/Lower Extremity (ULE) score at 3 months after first and second side treatment, compared with the respective control groups.
MDS-UPDRS Part III is a standard clinical scale used to assess Parkinson's motor symptoms. ULE score focuses on motor function in the arms and legs. Assessments are performed in the OFF-medication state, meaning Parkinson's medications are temporarily withheld so that the treatment effect can be measured more accurately.
In addition improvement in motor complications will be assessed with MDS-UPDRS Part IV and Patient diaries.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified30 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
A Post Approval Study (US) / Pre Market Extension Study (Outside US), international prospective, multi-center, assessor-blinded, two-stage (2:1) randomized controlled trial evaluating successive Exablate treatment (first and second side) versus BMT (Best Medical Treatment).
In individuals eligible for the staged, bilateral Exablate PTT procedure, building on evidence from the predicate pivotal staged bilateral study that led to PMA approval in the United States, this trial aims to evaluate the successive treatment of 1st and 2nd side Exablate PTT ablation using a two-stage randomized controlled design. In Stage 1, patients will be randomized to receive either 1st side PTT procedure or best medical treatment (BMT). Patients who initially randomized to receive BMT will cross over to receive 1st side PTT procedure after 3 months (if they still qualify for the treatment). All patients will continue to be followed through a 6-month period post 1st side treatment. All eligible patients who reach Stage 2 will be re-randomized to undergo 2nd side PTT procedure or continue with BMT. Patients randomized to receive BMT in stage 2 will cross over to receive 2nd side PTT procedure after 3 months (if they still qualify for the treatment). All patients will continue to be followed through a 12-month period post 2nd side treatment. This design enables evaluation between staged-bilateral treatment, unilateral treatment alone, and standard of care (SOC)/BMT medical therapy. This study will generate real-world comparative data to better inform decision-makers about the generalizability in subthalamic region ablations involving the PTT. Outcomes will be assessed using relevant lateralized Parkinson-specific clinical scales, measures of functional impairment, disease-specific quality of life, adverse events, and patient-reported perceptions of overall treatment effectiveness.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Additional Exclusion Criteria for Staged Bilateral PTT procedure
1st side Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy for Parkinson's Disease
2nd side staged Exablate MRgFUS Pallidothalamic Tractotomy for Parkinson's Disease
Subjects will be managed according to conventional therapeutic guidelines (i.e., best medical treatment) for Parkinson's Disease
Time frame: 3 Months
Between-group difference (Active Group 1 vs. Control Group 1) in the treatment effect (point change) in the MDS-UPRDS Part III ULE score in the OFF-medication state from Baseline to 3 month.
This assessment will be performed by a Movement Disorders neurologist blinded to patient study group allocation.
Time frame: 3 Months
Between-group difference (Active Group 2 vs. Control Group 2) in the treatment effect (point change) in the MDS-UPRDS Part III ULE score in the OFF-medication state from Baseline to 3 month.
This assessment will be performed by a Movement Disorders neurologist blinded to patient study group allocation.
Time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.
Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.
Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.
Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.
Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.
Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.
Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.
Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.
Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.
Time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
Between-group comparison (Active Group 1 vs Control Group 1) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 1 (unilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 1) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3 and 6) following Treatment 1 compared to baseline.
Between-group comparison (Active Group 2 vs Control Group 2) of the treatment effect at Month 3 following Treatment 2 (staged bilateral) and within-group comparison (Active Group 2) of the treatment effect at all study visits (Month 1, 3, 6 and 12) following Treatment 2 compared to baseline.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Elisa Cerutti, PhD
CONTACT
Jai Shetake, PhD
CONTACT
InSightec
Industry
An MR Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) Randomized Trial Using the Exablate Neuro System to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety Outcomes of Unilateral and Staged Bilateral Ablation in the Subthalamic Region Involving the Pallidothalamic Tract (PTT) in Advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) With Motor Complications.
Acronym: FREEDOM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07748715
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07748962
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06293118
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07716553
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Ferrara, Italy
View Trial Details