Sanford USD Medical Center
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105, United States
NCT Number: NCT07757113
Single site, prospective, comparative effectiveness pilot trial comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of three embolic materials (particles, liquid embolics, and Wallaby Phenox coils) in MMA embolication for cSDH.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105, United States
Participants will be sequentially enrolled into one of three treatment arms based on the embolic material used during their MMA embolization:
Cohort/Arm 1: Particles (polyvinyl alcohol or similar microspheres) Cohort/Arm 2: Liquid embolics (Onyx, n-BCA, or equivalent) Cohort/Arm 3: Phenox coils (Avenir UNO Helical Coil) Participants will remain on study through their standard 30- and 90-day follow-up visits.
With a target of 30 patients (10 per arm), the study will provide preliminary data on radiographic efficacy (primary: hematoma resolution/thickness reduction), safety (complications, recurrence, adverse events, reinterventions), and exploratory outcomes (symptom/functional improvement, procedural metrics, influence of comorbidities/antithrombotics).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will be sequentially enrolled into one of three clinically accepted MMAE treatment strategies (interventions) to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Participants will be sequentially enrolled into one of three clinically accepted MMAE treatment strategies (interventions) to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Participants will be sequentially enrolled into one of three clinically accepted MMAE treatment strategies (interventions) to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, 90 days
The primary objective aims to compare the radiographic efficacy of three embolic materials (particles, liquid embolics, Phenox coils) in MMA embolization for cSDH to evaluate change in hematoma size.
Time frame: Baseline, 90 days
The secondary objectives aim to evaluate the safety profile of the embolic materials, to support overall comparative effectiveness.
Time frame: Baseline, 90 days
The secondary objectives aim to evaluate the the safety profile of the embolic materials, to support overall comparative effectiveness.
Time frame: Baseline, 90 days
The secondary objectives aim to evaluate the the safety profile of the embolic materials, to support overall comparative effectiveness.
Time frame: Baseline, 90 days
The secondary objectives aim to evaluate the the safety profile of the embolic materials, to support overall comparative effectiveness.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Sanford Health
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06696079
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Oulu, North Ostrobothnia, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT07731620
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07729098
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07720687
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial Details