West China hospital of Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000, China
NCT Number: NCT07757074
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. In 2022, China saw about 357,200 new cases and 75,000 deaths, accounting for 15.59% and 7.94% of all new cancer cases and cancer-related deaths, respectively. Factors like physician skills, patient attitudes, economics, and tumor-related issues have led to a breast-conserving rate of about 19.5% nationwide, and less than 10% in non-first-tier cities. The immediate breast reconstruction rate after mastectomy is around 10.7%, with over 70% of patients losing their breasts during initial surgery. These patients often face long-term suboptimal psychological health post-surgery. As treatment outcomes improve, more patients are seeking delayed breast reconstruction.
Breast reconstruction after simple mastectomy faces challenges due to insufficient skin and tissue volume. Traditional methods include: (1) A two - stage procedure with a tissue expander in the first stage and prosthesis replacement in the second stage. This approach increases costs, requires two surgeries and anesthetics, and carries higher risks of incision dehiscence, prosthesis exposure, infection, and surgical failure. (2) Autologous reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi muscle flap, which involves simultaneous surgery on donor and recipient sites. This method results in significant trauma, longer operating times, higher complication risks, compromised sensation and function, large scars, and potential shoulder - related issues. Due to limited tissue volume, a prosthesis is often needed. While autologous reconstruction offers better breast satisfaction and social psychological health, its complexity and costs limit patient acceptance.
To tackle these challenges, our team has developed a minimally invasive, two - stage endoscopic breast reconstruction technique via an axillary approach with an inflation method. This approach reduces surgical time, trauma, and costs, minimizes complications, and enables faster recovery. The tension - free axillary incision eliminates the risk of dehiscence. Skin expansion through the prosthesis cavity results in a more natural - looking and softer breast. No studies have compared this technique with latissimus dorsi ± prosthesis reconstruction after simple mastectomy. We propose a prospective cohort study to evaluate its safety and feasibility, aiming to offer a more cost - effective, simple, and efficient reconstruction option to improve patients' quality of life.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–70 year
Female
Observational
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000, China
This study is a multicenter, open, prospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria: (1) Female patients aged 18 - 70 years (inclusive) who have undergone simple mastectomy for breast cancer; (2) Patients with good local flap viability and laxity one year after total mastectomy or six months after completion of radiotherapy; (3) Patients who are able and willing to sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
(1) Recurrence detected on follow-up (based on clinical, imaging, or pathological findings), including local/regional recurrence or uncontrollable distant metastasis; (2) Patients who had the pectoralis major muscle resected during the initial mastectomy; (3) History of thoracic or back surgery with suspected damage to the thoracodorsal vessels; (4) Poor general condition and inability to tolerate surgery; (5) Presence of severe comorbidities, such as uncontrolled diabetes, severe bone marrow suppression after breast cancer treatment, compromised immune function, or a history of long-term smoking; (6) Participation in other clinical studies that may interfere with this trial.
Prior to group allocation, investigators at each research center will first stratify the subjects by radiotherapy. The subjects will be divided into two groups based on whether they have received radiotherapy, with the sample size ratio of the radiotherapy group to the non-radiotherapy group being 1:2. Subsequently, the subjects will be assigned to the two-stage endoscopic immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction group (with a proportion of "3") and the latissimus dorsi±prosthesis breast reconstruction group (with a proportion of "1"). The target sample size is 268 participants, comprising 89 in the radiotherapy group (67 in the two-stage endoscopic immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction group, 22 in the latissimus dorsi±prosthesis breast reconstruction group) and 179 in the non-radiotherapy group (134 in the two-stage endoscopic immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction group, 45 in the latissimus dorsi±prosthesis breast reconstruction group).
Collecting data includes encompassing demographics (e.g., age, BMI, breast ptosis), medical history (e.g., comorbidities, prior surgeries, family cancer history), oncological profiles (e.g., tumor type, size, location, stage, immunohistochemistry, nodal status, neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies), and surgical details (e.g., procedure type, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, margin status, gland resection weight, implant size, drainage placement) from preoperatively to postoperatively. Postoperative follow-ups at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year will document complications, cosmesis (BREAST-Q, SCAR-Q, QLQ-BR45, Harris and Ueda assessments). Complications are recorded per patient, with events classified as major, minor, or any using the Clavien-Dindo grading system (Grades I-II: minor; III-IV: major). BREAST-Q/SCAR-Q/QLQ-BR45 questionnaires will be completed preoperatively and at 6 months/12 months postoperatively, alongside Harris and Ueda assessments and standardized breast photography (anteroposterior, lateral, oblique views).
An interim analysis will occur 1 year after study initiation and 1 month post-enrollment completion. Final analysis follows 1-year postoperative follow-up for all participants. Categorical variables will be analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests; continuous variables via t-tests, ANOVA, or non-parametric alternatives (Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis) as appropriate. Survival outcomes will employ Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank testing.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The different surgery options for patients Post-Mastectomy
Time frame: Preoperative (baseline), 1-year postoperative
The Satisfaction with Breasts module of BREAST-Q questionnaire is utilized to assess patient-reported aesthetic outcomes. Transformed scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. Both raw questionnaire scores and standardized transformed scores will be documented, along with pre- to postoperative differences in transformed scores
Time frame: 1 year postoperative
Skin flap thermal injury, skin flap ischemia/necrosis, nipple and areola complex(NAC) ischemia/necrosis, surgical site infection, incision dehiscence, surgical site bleeding or hematoma, seroma needing repeated aspiration or drain reinsertion, capsular contracture, prosthesis outline appearance, rippling, implant displacement, implant loss, readmission
Time frame: Intraoperative
data evaluation
Time frame: perioperative
perioperative data evaluation
Time frame: perioperative
perioperative data evaluation
Time frame: 1 year postoperative
The Psychosocial Well-Being, Sexual Well-Being, and Physical Well-Being of the Chest modules of BREAST-Q questionnaire are used to evaluate quality of life (QoL) outcomes. Transformed scores range from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating better outcomes. Both raw questionnaire scores and standardized transformed scores will be recorded, along with pre- to postoperative differences in transformed scores.
Time frame: 1-year postoperative
The Harris score was used to record the subjective judgment of symmetry of the reconstructed breast compared to the contralateral breast. The results were categorized as excellent (treated breast nearly identical to untreated breast), good (treated breast slightly different than untreated), fair (treated breast clearly different than untreated), and poor (treated breast seriously distorted)
Time frame: 1-year postoperative
Doctor-reported aesthetic outcomes will be evaluated by three professional breast surgeons using the Ueda scale, based on postoperative photographs. Scores range from 0 to 10 points, with higher values indicating better results. The categorized as follows: Excellent (≥9 points), Good (7-8 points), Fair (5-6 points), Poor (≤4 points). Both raw scores and categorizations will be documented
Time frame: 1-year postoperative
EORTC Scores are a series of questionnaires developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients. These questionnaires are widely used in clinical trials and clinical practice to help evaluate treatment outcomes and patients' quality of life. The scoring range is from 0 to 100. A higher score in the functional domains indicates better functioning, while a higher score in the symptom domains indicates more severe symptoms
Time frame: 1-year postoperative
The SCAR-Q questionnaire is utilized to assess patient-reported scar outcomes. Transformed scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. Both raw and standardized transformed scores will be documented, along with pre- to postoperative differences.
Time frame: 1-year postoperative
Capsular contracture, Implant visibility, Rippling, Implant displacement, Animation deformity, Pectoralis major pain.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Du Zhenggui
Other
A National Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study on Delayed Endoscopic Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Via Transaxillary Approach Versus Latissimus Dorsi ± Implant Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy
Acronym: DELTI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07619534
Breast Cancer, Breast Carcinoma
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07752238
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07757958
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07753226
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details