Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07756437

Validation of a Circulating Tumor DNA Blood Test in Muscle-Invasive Bladder and Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer

This prospective observational study evaluates a blood-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer or upper tract urothelial cancer. ctDNA consists of small fragments of tumor DNA that can sometimes be detected in the blood.

In this study, DNA from tumor tissue obtained during routine diagnostic or surgical procedures will be analyzed to identify tumor-specific mutations. Blood samples collected during routine clinical care will then be tested to determine whether the same mutations can be detected in plasma ctDNA.

The main purpose is to assess how well the internally developed ctDNA assay detects tumor-specific mutations compared with tumor tissue sequencing. The study will also explore whether ctDNA results after treatment are associated with recurrence or remission during two years of follow-up, and whether changes in ctDNA levels during treatment are associated with pathological response.

This study does not assign participants to a treatment and does not require additional blood draws beyond routine care. Treating physicians will remain blinded to ctDNA results during the study, so the test results will not influence clinical decisions.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

AZ Sint-Lucas Gent

Ghent, East Flanders, 9000, Belgium

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Jeroen Van Besien, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

003292246650

Jeroen Van Besien, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loic Baekelandt, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

CONTACT

[email protected]

About this study

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer and muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma are associated with a relevant risk of recurrence or progression after treatment. Current follow-up mainly relies on imaging, pathology, and clinical assessment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may provide additional information on tumor burden, minimal residual disease, and treatment response, but clinical implementation remains limited by cost, logistics, and the need for local assay validation.

This study evaluates an internally developed, tumor-informed ctDNA workflow in patients treated at AZ Sint-Lucas Gent. Tumor DNA will be extracted from available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, such as tissue obtained during transurethral resection of bladder tumor, upper tract biopsy, nephro-ureterectomy, cystectomy, or biopsy of metastatic disease. Targeted next-generation sequencing will be used to identify patient-specific somatic mutations in the tumor tissue.

When tumor-specific mutations are identified, matched plasma samples collected during routine clinical care will be analyzed for the same mutations. Cell-free DNA will be extracted from plasma and ctDNA detection will be performed using a tumor-informed approach, primarily by digital droplet PCR for known tumor-specific mutations. Mutations that cannot be assessed by digital droplet PCR may be further evaluated using next-generation sequencing.

Blood samples will be obtained only as part of routine diagnostic, staging, treatment, or follow-up blood draws. The study does not assign participants to a specific treatment and does not require additional study-specific therapeutic interventions. Patients will receive standard clinical care according to institutional practice.

Treating physicians will remain blinded to the ctDNA results during the study. The ctDNA results are investigational and will not guide treatment decisions during the study period. Clinical, pathological, treatment, molecular, and follow-up data will be collected to assess the performance of the assay and to explore associations between ctDNA status, treatment response, recurrence, progression, and remission over two years of follow-up.

The study is intended to support internal validation of a local ctDNA assay and to determine whether this approach may be feasible for future integration into clinical workflows for urothelial cancer monitoring.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Histologically confirmed muscle-invasive bladder cancer or suspected muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma, stage T2 or higher.
  • Availability of tumor tissue from transurethral resection of bladder tumor, ureteroscopic biopsy, biopsy of a metastatic lesion, or nephroureterectomy for DNA extraction.
  • Written informed consent provided.

Exclusion criteria

  • Concurrent active malignancy diagnosed within the past 5 years.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Performance of Plasma ctDNA for Detecting Tumor-Specific Mutations

    Time frame: From enrollment until completion of tumor tissue sequencing and matched plasma ctDNA analysis, up to 6 months

    Concordance between tumor-specific somatic mutations identified in tumor tissue and the same mutations detected in matched plasma-derived ctDNA. Diagnostic performance of the internally developed ctDNA assay will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, with tumor tissue sequencing as the reference standard.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Association Between Post-Treatment ctDNA Positivity and Disease Recurrence or Progression

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after surgery or radiotherapy

    Association between ctDNA positivity after surgery or radiotherapy, with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic treatment, and disease recurrence or progression during the first two years of follow-up.

  2. Association Between Post-Treatment ctDNA Negativity and Disease Remission

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after surgery or radiotherapy

    Association between ctDNA negativity after surgery or radiotherapy, with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic treatment, and absence of disease recurrence or progression during the first two years of follow-up.

  3. Association Between Preoperative ctDNA Negativity and Pathological T0 Status

    Time frame: At cystectomy

    Association between ctDNA negativity before surgery, with or without neoadjuvant systemic treatment, and pathological T0 status on the cystectomy specimen.

  4. Association Between Quantitative ctDNA Decrease During Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pathological Downstaging

    Time frame: From start of neoadjuvant therapy until cystectomy, up to 6 months

    Association between a quantitative decrease in ctDNA levels during neoadjuvant therapy and favorable pathological response, defined as tumor downstaging at cystectomy.

  5. Time Difference Between ctDNA Rise and Imaging-Detected Disease Relapse

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after curative treatment

    Assessment of whether disease relapse after curative treatment is detected earlier by a rise in ctDNA than by standard imaging studies. The time difference will be measured in months.

    The protocol lists one primary endpoint and five secondary endpoints, including diagnostic performance, recurrence/remission within two years, pT0 status, pathological downstaging, and earlier relapse detection by ctDNA.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jeroen Van Besien, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

003292246650

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AZ Sint-Lucas Gent

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Internal Validation of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Sequencing in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer and Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Prospective Observational Study

Acronym: BLUT-DNA

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2029
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.