Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07754838

Acoustic Stimulation to Study and Modulate Sleepwalking and Related Arousal Disorders

Disorders of Arousal (DoA)-such as sleepwalking, sleep terrors, and confusional arousals-are common sleep problems that happen during deep, non-dreaming sleep. Researchers do not fully understand what triggers these episodes or how to influence them.

This study tests whether playing soft sounds during sleep can help researchers learn more about, and possibly induce or modulate, these episodes under safe, supervised conditions. Participants with DoA will spend two nights in the sleep laboratory, with painless sensors placed on the scalp and body (similar to a regular sleep study). On one night, no sound is played. On the other night, soft sounds are played during deep sleep. The order of the two nights is decided randomly for each participant.

A small group of healthy volunteers without DoA will also take part, undergoing a single night with sound stimulation, to help researchers understand whether the sounds affect everyone the same way or specifically trigger episodes in people with DoA.

A subgroup of participants with DoA will also take part in a later, exploratory step in which the sound is triggered automatically, in real time, based on brain activity patterns.

The sounds used are very quiet, similar in volume to normal conversation, and stimulation is stopped right away if a participant shows any discomfort. The goal of this research is to better understand what triggers Disorders of Arousal, and to test whether sound-based stimulation could one day help study or manage this condition.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

6 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Disorders of Arousal (DoA)-including sleepwalking, sleep terrors, and confusional arousals-are NREM parasomnias whose underlying neurophysiological triggers remain poorly understood. A growing body of evidence suggests that DoA episodes do not emerge randomly from sleep but arise from identifiable pre-episode EEG states characterized by increased slow-wave activity and reduced cortical activation, consistent with a transient state of arousal instability. Closed-loop acoustic stimulation (CLAS) is an established, non-invasive method for probing and modulating NREM sleep physiology, but has not previously been applied in the specific context of NREM parasomnias.

This study investigates whether controlled acoustic stimulation, initially delivered with randomized timing and subsequently in a real-time, EEG-triggered closed-loop fashion, can reliably elicit or modulate DoA episodes under supervised laboratory conditions. A small group of healthy volunteers undergoes a single stimulation night to estimate the specificity of stimulation-elicited motor responses, helping distinguish genuine DoA vulnerability from a non-specific arousal response to sound.

The within-subject, randomized-order design in DoA participants allows each to serve as their own control, isolating the effect of acoustic stimulation from other sources of night-to-night variability. The exploratory closed-loop sub-study tests the technical feasibility of triggering stimulation based on real-time EEG markers of vulnerability, representing a first step toward future predictive or modulation-based approaches for this condition.

This study is part of a broader research programme on the neurobiological characterization of Disorders of Arousal; related observational components (including neuroimaging, neuropsychological assessment, and home monitoring) are registered separately.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

For participants with Disorders of Arousal (DoA):

  • Diagnosis of a Disorder of Arousal (sleepwalking, sleep terror, or confusional arousal) per ICSD-3 criteria, confirmed by video-polysomnography or by clinical diagnosis plus a positive Arousal Disorders Questionnaire (ADQ) and compatible history
  • Age 6-17 years (paediatric) or 18-60 years (adult) at enrollment
  • At least one documented episode in the 4 weeks (paediatric) or 6 months (adult) prior to enrollment
  • Ability to understand and complete study materials in Italian
  • Written informed consent (and age-appropriate assent for minors, per Swiss Human Research Act Art. 22-23)

For healthy volunteers:

  • No documented sleep disorder, confirmed by clinical interview, questionnaires, or prior instrumental examination
  • Age- and sex-matched to the paediatric DoA group
  • No clinically significant psychiatric or neurological history
  • Written informed consent and age-appropriate assent

Exclusion criteria

(all participants):

  • Epilepsy or other major neurological disorder
  • Comorbid REM sleep behavior disorder or other REM parasomnia
  • Current psychopharmacological or psychotropic medication (except melatonin ≤2 mg)
  • Neurodevelopmental disorder precluding protocol collaboration (paediatric participants)
  • Clinically relevant sleep-disordered breathing (Apnea-Hypopnea Index >5 events/hour)
  • Clinically significant hearing deficit
  • Significant sleep deprivation in the 48 hours prior to laboratory recording
  • Pregnancy (adult participants)
  • Inadequate EEG recording quality (>40% artifact channels or epochs) - applied at the session level

Treatment and study plan

Closed-Loop/Open-Loop Acoustic Stimulation (CLAS)

Device

Brief, low-intensity auditory stimuli (pure tones or noise bursts, 50-70 dB SPL, approximately 1 second in duration) delivered via a standard speaker during confirmed slow-wave sleep (SWS). In the initial open-loop phase, stimuli are presented with randomized timing. In a later closed-loop sub-study, stimuli are triggered automatically in real time based on predefined EEG features, within randomized vulnerability versus refractory stimulation windows. Stimulation is immediately interrupted in the event of distress, full awakening, or any adverse reaction.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of DoA Episodes During the Stimulation Night Compared With the No-Stimulation Night

    Time frame: Assessed during the two laboratory overnight recordings (no-stimulation night and stimulation night), at least 48 hours apart, up to 6 weeks

    Number of video-polysomnographically confirmed Disorders of Arousal (DoA) episodes (sleepwalking, sleep terror, or confusional arousal), compared within-subject between the stimulation night and the no-stimulation (baseline) night.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of DoA Episodes (Seconds): Stimulation Night vs. No-Stimulation Night

    Time frame: Assessed during the two laboratory overnight recordings (no-stimulation night and stimulation night), at least 48 hours apart, up to 6 weeks.

    Mean duration (seconds) of video-polysomnographically confirmed DoA episodes, compared within-subject between the stimulation night and the no-stimulation (baseline) night.

  2. Proportion of Slow-Wave Sleep Epochs With Successful Stimulation Trigger (Percentage)

    Time frame: Assessed during the stimulation-night overnight recording, up to 6 weeks.

    Percentage of detected slow-wave sleep epochs in which acoustic stimulation was successfully triggered within the predefined target window, during the stimulation night.

  3. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Rating of Perceived Discomfort Related to Acoustic Stimulation

    Time frame: Assessed the morning following the stimulation night, up to 6 weeks.

    Participant-rated discomfort attributable to acoustic stimulation, using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (0 = no discomfort, 10 = worst imaginable discomfort)

  4. Arousal Index (EEG Arousals per Hour of Sleep): Stimulation Night vs. No-Stimulation Night

    Time frame: Assessed during both laboratory overnight recordings (no-stimulation night and stimulation night), up to 6 weeks.

    Arousal index (number of EEG-defined arousals per hour of total sleep time, scored per AASM criteria), compared between the stimulation night and the no-stimulation night.

  5. Sleep Efficiency (Percentage): Stimulation Night vs. No-Stimulation Night

    Time frame: Assessed during both laboratory overnight recordings (no-stimulation night and stimulation night), up to 6 weeks.

    Sleep efficiency (percentage of time in bed spent asleep), derived from polysomnographic sleep staging, compared between the stimulation night and the no-stimulation night.

Other outcomes

  1. Proportion of DoA Episodes With Reported Conscious Experience: Spontaneous vs. Stimulation-Elicited Episodes

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after each DoA episode during both laboratory overnight recordings (no-stimulation night and stimulation night), up to 6 weeks.

    Percentage of DoA episodes associated with a reported conscious experience (recalled or unrecalled mental content, assessed via immediate post-episode interview), compared between spontaneous episodes (no-stimulation night) and stimulation-elicited episodes (stimulation night).

  2. Source-Level EEG Spectral Power (Delta 0.5-4 Hz and Beta 18-30 Hz Bands): Spontaneous vs. Stimulation-Elicited DoA Episodes

    Time frame: Derived from continuous high-density EEG recorded during both laboratory overnight recordings (no-stimulation night and stimulation night), up to 6 weeks.

    Power spectral density in the delta and beta bands, source-localized, compared between spontaneous DoA episodes (no-stimulation night) and stimulation-elicited DoA episodes (stimulation night).

  3. Odds Ratio of DoA Episode Occurrence During EEG-Defined Fragility vs. Refractory Stimulation Windows (Closed-Loop Feasibility)

    Time frame: Assessed during the closed-loop pilot phase (Phase 3b), within a subset of participants, up to 6 weeks.

    Odds ratio of DoA episode occurrence when stimulation is delivered during EEG-defined fragility windows versus randomly selected refractory windows, in the exploratory closed-loop pilot sub-study.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Anna Castelnovo, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

0041 918116117

Mauro Manconi, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

0041918116869

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Anna Castelnovo

Other

Collaborators

  • Swiss National Science Foundation
  • University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland
  • University of Bologna
  • University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • University of the Italian Switzerland

Registry information

Official study title

Closed-Loop and Open-Loop Acoustic Stimulation During Sleep to Investigate and Modulate Disorders of Arousal in Children and Adults

Acronym: DoA-CLAS

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2030
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.