Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07754747

Effects of Vestibular-Oriented Balance Training Versus Motor Dual Task Training on Balance, Postural Control, and Fall Risk in Chronic Stroke Survivors

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of Vestibular-Oriented Balance Training and Motor Dual Task Training on balance, postural control, and fall risk among chronic stroke survivors. Forty-six participants diagnosed with chronic stroke will be randomly allocated into two intervention groups. Both groups will receive conventional physiotherapy along with their assigned intervention for six weeks. Outcome measures will include the Biodex Balance System (Overall Stability Index, Anterior-Posterior Stability Index, Medial-Lateral Stability Index and Fall Risk Index), Modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance( m-CTISB). The findings will provide evidence regarding the most effective rehabilitation strategy for improving, Overall stability, and functional balance and reducing fall risk in chronic stroke survivors.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

40 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Armed Forces Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Rawalpindi, 46000, Pakistan

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Ijaz Ahmed, MS-NMPT

CONTACT

[email protected]

+923437149637

About this study

Stroke is one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide and is associated with significant impairments in balance, postural control, mobility, and functional independence. Balance dysfunction remains one of the most challenging complications in chronic stroke survivors despite conventional rehabilitation interventions.

Vestibular-Oriented Balance Training (VOBT) is an evidence-based rehabilitation approach designed to improve balance by stimulating the vestibular system and enhancing sensory integration. This intervention includes exercises involving head movements, gaze stabilization, balance challenges on stable and unstable surfaces, dynamic postural tasks, and coordinated body movements.

Although both Vestibular-Oriented Balance Training and Motor Dual Task Training have demonstrated beneficial effects individually, there is limited high-quality evidence directly comparing their effectiveness in improving balance, postural control, and fall risk among chronic stroke survivors. Identifying the more effective rehabilitation strategy would assist physiotherapists in selecting evidence-based interventions that optimize patient recovery and functional independence.

The present study is designed as a randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of Vestibular-Oriented Balance Training and Motor Dual Task Training on balance, postural control, and fall risk in individuals with chronic stroke. A total of 50 eligible participants diagnosed with chronic stroke will be recruited using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants will be randomly allocated into two parallel intervention groups using a computer-generated randomization sequence.

Participants allocated to the experimental group will receive Vestibular-Oriented Balance Training in addition to conventional physiotherapy. The intervention will consist of progressive vestibular exercises including gaze stabilization, head movement exercises, balance training on different support surfaces, weight-shifting activities, dynamic standing balance tasks, reaching activities, stepping exercises, and functional gait activities. The intensity and difficulty of the exercises will be progressively increased according to each participant's performance and tolerance throughout the intervention period.

Participants allocated to the active comparator group will receive Motor Dual Task Training together with the same conventional physiotherapy program. The intervention will include simultaneous performance of balance and mobility tasks combined with functional motor activities such as walking while carrying objects, obstacle negotiation, reaching during standing, stepping while manipulating objects, and other progressively challenging motor dual-task exercises. Exercise progression will be individualized according to participant performance to ensure safety and maximize functional improvement.

Both groups will receive intervention sessions three times per week for five consecutive weeks. Each treatment session will last approximately 45 to 60 minutes. Conventional physiotherapy will be standardized across both groups to ensure that the only difference between groups is the assigned experimental intervention.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of ischemic stroke.
  • Stroke duration ≥6 months.
  • Rhomberg scale
  • MMSE ≥ 24
  • Able to walk with or without assistive device.
  • Able to understand commands
  • Willing to participate and provide consent aged between 40-70 years.

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe visual impairements which effect balance.
  • Participants with acute or sub acute stroke <6 moths.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Other neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's
  • Participation in any other interventional trail.

Treatment and study plan

Experimental

Other

Participants will receive vestibular-oriented balance exercises together with conventional physiotherapy for five weeks

Control

Other

Participants will receive motor dual-task balance training together with conventional physiotherapy for five weeks.

Primary outcomes

  1. Biodex Over all stability Index

    Time frame: assessment at baseline and after 6 weeks

    Overall Stability Index (OSI) on the Biodex Balance System is a comprehensive score measuring how well a person controls their balance and keeps a moving platform level. Higher numbers mean more platform tilt and poorer balance control, while lower numbers show better stability and stronger neuromuscular coordination.

  2. Biodex Fall Risk index

    Time frame: at baseline and after 6 weeks

    It measures a person's stability and risk of falling by tracking how much they sway on a moveable balance platform. Higher scores indicate poor stability and a higher likelihood of falls

  3. Modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance

    Time frame: at baseline and after 6 weeks

    a clinical tool used to evaluate static postural control and identify which sensory systems (vision, vestibular, or somatosensory/proprioceptive) a patient relies on or struggles with to maintain balance.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Biodex APSI

    Time frame: at baseline and after 6 weeks

    Anterior/Posterior Stability Index (APSI) on the Biodex Balance System measures front-to-back postural sway and balance ability. Higher scores indicate greater platform displacement and poorer stability, while lower scores reflect better front-to-back neuromuscular control and stability.

  2. Biodex Medial/Lateral Stability Index

    Time frame: at baseline and after 6 weeks

    A lower score indicates better stability, meaning the person stayed closer to the center level. A higher score represents greater side-to-side sway, indicating poor postural performance or a higher risk of falling.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Hafsah Arshad, PhD*

CONTACT

[email protected]

03315165234

Ijaz Ahmed, MS-NMPT

CONTACT

[email protected]

+923437149637

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ibadat International University, Islamabad

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Vestibular-Oriented Balance Training Versus Motor Dual Task Training on Balance, Postural Control, and Fall Risk in Chronic Stroke SurvivorsIIUI/RERC

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.