Hospital Universitario Dexeus
Barcelona, BARCELONA, 08028, Spain
NCT Number: NCT07753707
Influence of different tibial fixation methods in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: bone integration, graft maturation, and clinical outcomes.
Primary Objective
To assess whether any of the four tibial fixation techniques is superior in terms of:
Graft-bone integration (CT/MRI),
Graft maturation (MRI),
Clinical outcomes (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner scores; manual and instrumented knee stability with KT-1000 arthrometer).
Secondary Objectives
Compare clinical outcomes among groups (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner).
Compare re-rupture rates and patient satisfaction.
Study Design
Prospective randomized trial.
The study will be registered in the international Clinical Trials registry.
Inclusion Criteria
Age ≥18 years.
Complete ACL rupture treated with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons.
Exclusion Criteria
Age ≥55 years.
Patients treated with allografts, bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts, or quadriceps tendon grafts.
Malpositioned tunnels (evaluated by MRI at 6 months postop).
Previous knee surgery.
Femoral or tibial deformities.
Multiligament injuries.
Note: Soft tissue procedures (e.g., meniscal repair) are not exclusion criteria.
Randomization
Patients meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized (via Research Randomizer: https://www.randomizer.org/
) into 3 groups:
Group A (TORN): bioabsorbable interference screw, same diameter as the tunnel.
Group B (TORN+1): bioabsorbable interference screw, one mm larger than the tunnel diameter.
Group C (TORN-BT): interference screw (same size as tunnel) + second fixation with cortical button/plate.
Sample size: 37 patients per group, 111 total.
Follow-up
Radiographic, CT, and MRI evaluation pre-op, at 15 days, and at 1 year post-op.
Clinical and radiological follow-up for 1 year.
Statistical Analysis
In the prospective phase, Student's t-test will be performed for comparison of pre- and postoperative variables. All variables will also be compared between groups and within groups (baseline vs. end of follow-up) using analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Linear regression models will be applied to test for potential significance that could be masked by confounding factors.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Barcelona, BARCELONA, 08028, Spain
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Age ≥18 years.
Complete ACL rupture treated with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons.
Exclusion criteria
Age ≥55 years.
Patients treated with allografts, bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts, or quadriceps tendon grafts.
Malpositioned tunnels (evaluated by MRI at 6 months postop).
Previous knee surgery.
Femoral or tibial deformities.
Multiligament injuries.
Note: Soft tissue procedures (e.g., meniscal repair) are not exclusion criteria.
The three different types of tibial fixation in ACL reconstruction with Hamstring autograft:
Group A (TORN): bioabsorbable interference screw, same diameter as the tunnel.
Group B (TORN+1): bioabsorbable interference screw, one mm larger than the tunnel diameter.
Group C (TORN-BT): interference screw (same size as tunnel) + second fixation with cortical button/plate.
Time frame: 12 months
Graft-bone integration assessed by CT or MRI according to tunnel healing and bone incorporation.
Time frame: 6-12 months
Graft maturation assessed on MRI using the Signal-to-Noise Quotient (SNQ).
Time frame: 12 months
Patient-reported knee function. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.
Time frame: 12 months
Activity level assessed using the Tegner Activity Scale. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher activity levels.
Time frame: 12 months
Anterior tibial translation measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer. Lower side-to-side differences indicate better knee stability.
Institut Català de Traumatologia i Medicina de l'Esport
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06973785
ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, ACL Injuries
Coral Springs, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07009392
ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Lyon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03462823
ACL, ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT07659561
ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Lyon, France
View Trial Details