Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07752901

High-Intensity Interval Resistance Training and Low-to-Moderate-Intensity Resistance Training in Upper Extremity Muscles

High-intensity interval resistance training (HIIRT) has emerged as a time-efficient alternative to conventional resistance training; however, evidence regarding upper-extremity-focused HIIRT and its multidimensional effects remains limited. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of upper-extremity HIIRT and low-to-moderate-intensity resistance training (LMRT) on muscle strength, functional capacity, cognition, mental health, and health-related quality of life in healthy young adults.

Forty-nine healthy young adults aged 18-25 years will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: HIIRT, LMRT, or a control group. Participants in the intervention groups will complete supervised upper-extremity resistance training sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks, while the control group will receive no structured exercise intervention.

Outcome measures will include isotonic upper-extremity muscle strength, the Six-Minute Walk Test, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire, the Dispositional Flow Scale-2, and the Short Form-36 Health Survey. The study is designed to evaluate the effects of the two resistance training protocols on physical, cognitive, and psychological outcomes in healthy young adults.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–25 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Munzur University Faculty of Health Sciences

Tunceli, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Resistance training is widely recognized as an effective intervention for improving muscle strength, functional performance, and overall health. In recent years, high-intensity interval resistance training (HIIRT) has emerged as a time-efficient alternative to conventional resistance training because it combines high-load resistance exercises with brief recovery intervals. Although previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of HIIRT for improving muscular performance, evidence regarding upper-extremity-focused HIIRT and its effects on cognitive function, mental health, and health-related quality of life remains limited.

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of an 8-week upper-extremity high-intensity interval resistance training (HIIRT) program with those of a conventional low-to-moderate-intensity resistance training (LMRT) program in healthy young adults.

A total of 49 healthy participants aged 18-25 years will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) HIIRT, (2) LMRT, or (3) a control group. Randomization will be performed using age- and sex-stratified block randomization. Participants in both exercise groups will complete supervised training sessions twice weekly for eight consecutive weeks, whereas the control group will receive no structured exercise intervention and will be instructed to maintain their usual lifestyle.

The HIIRT protocol will consist of upper-extremity exercises performed at 80% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) using a cluster-set format with short recovery intervals. The LMRT protocol will include the same exercises performed at 30-70% of 1RM using conventional resistance training principles. Both interventions will include exercises targeting the biceps curl, lat pulldown, pec deck, machine shoulder press, and seated row.

Outcome assessments will be performed before and after the 8-week intervention. Primary outcomes include upper-extremity isotonic muscle strength and functional capacity assessed by the Six-Minute Walk Test. Secondary outcomes include cognitive function assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, anxiety assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire, flow state assessed by the Dispositional Flow Scale-2, and health-related quality of life assessed by the Short Form-36 Health Survey.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy young adults aged 18 to 25 years.
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent. Ability to participate safely in an upper-extremity resistance training program. Willingness to attend supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks.
  • No participation in another clinical trial during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of cardiovascular disease.
  • Presence of neurological disease.
  • Presence of psychiatric disorder.
  • Presence of orthopedic disease or musculoskeletal condition limiting exercise participation.
  • Presence of any systemic disease that may interfere with exercise training or study assessments.
  • History of surgery affecting participation in the exercise program.
  • Cognitive or psychological conditions that could interfere with completion of the assessments.
  • Inability or unwillingness to comply with the study protocol.
  • Refusal to provide written informed consent.

Treatment and study plan

High-Intensity Interval Resistance Training (HIIRT)

Other

Participants performed supervised upper-extremity high-intensity interval resistance training twice weekly for 8 weeks using a multi-station resistance machine. Exercises included biceps curl, lat pulldown, pec deck, machine shoulder press, and seated row. Training intensity was set at 80% of one-repetition maximum (1RM). The protocol consisted of two sets, each including one cluster of six repetitions followed by two clusters of 2-3 repetitions separated by 20-second rest intervals, with 2 minutes and 30 seconds of rest between sets. Each session included a 5-minute warm-up and a 5-minute cool-down.

Low-to-Moderate-Intensity Resistance Training (LMRT)

Other

Participants performed supervised upper-extremity low-to-moderate-intensity resistance training twice weekly for 8 weeks using a multi-station resistance machine. Exercises included biceps curl, lat pulldown, pec deck, machine shoulder press, and seated row. Exercise intensity was prescribed at 30-70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), with 2-3 sets of 8-12 repetitions and at least 1 minute of rest between sets. Each training session included a 5-minute warm-up and a 5-minute cool-down.

Primary outcomes

  1. Upper Extremity Muscle Strength

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    Changes in isotonic upper-extremity muscle strength assessed using a multi-station resistance training machine. Strength will be measured for the biceps curl, lat pulldown, pec deck, machine shoulder press, and seated row exercises. The highest value from three trials for each exercise will be recorded.

  2. Functional Capacity

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    Changes in functional capacity assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Walking distance (meters) completed during the test will be recorded.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cognitive Function

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    Changes in cognitive performance assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.

  2. State Anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    Changes in state anxiety assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State (STAI-State). Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.

  3. Trait Anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    Changes in trait anxiety assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait (STAI-Trait). Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.

  4. Generalized Anxiety Symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    Changes in anxiety symptoms assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms.

  5. Flow State

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    Changes in dispositional flow assessed using the Dispositional Flow Scale-2 (DFS-2). The Dispositional Flow Scale-2 consists of 36 items, with total scores ranging from 36 to 180. Higher scores indicate a greater tendency to experience flow during activities (better outcome), whereas lower scores indicate a lower tendency to experience flow (worse outcome).

  6. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    Changes in health-related quality of life assessed using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). The SF-36 consists of eight domains, each scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life (better outcome) and lower scores indicating poorer health-related quality of life (worse outcome).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Effects of High-Intensity Interval Resistance Training and Low-to-Moderate-Intensity Resistance Training in Upper Extremity Muscles on Muscle Strength, Functional Capacity, Cognition, and Mental Health in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 7, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 7, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.