Ilk Evre Special Education and Rehabilitation Center
Istanbul, 34418, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07745608
This study evaluated the effects of medical ketogenic diet therapy combined with occupational therapy in children with ARX-related epilepsy. Twenty children were included. Ten children receiving a ketogenic diet formed the experimental group, and ten children not receiving a ketogenic diet formed the control group. Both groups received occupational therapy for 16 weeks. Assessments were performed at baseline, week 8, and week 16. Seizure frequency, motor performance, balance, sensory processing, chewing performance, eating behaviors, and health-related quality of life were evaluated.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me4 year–7 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, 34418, Turkey (Türkiye)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants received individualized occupational therapy sessions twice weekly for 16 weeks. The intervention was planned according to each child's clinical and functional needs and addressed motor performance, balance, sensory processing, feeding-related skills, chewing performance, and participation in daily activities.
Participants in the experimental arm continued medical ketogenic diet therapy prescribed and monitored by their clinical neurology and nutrition teams. The ketogenic diet was not initiated or assigned by the occupational therapy researcher.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Weekly seizure frequency was calculated from caregiver-recorded seizure diaries. The mean weekly seizure frequency was determined using seizure records collected over the preceding two months. Lower values indicate fewer seizures.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Health-related quality of life was assessed using the age-appropriate parent-proxy versions of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0). The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Change in total score was evaluated across the three assessment time points.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Functional balance was assessed using the Pediatric Balance Scale, a 14-item performance-based measure. The total score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating better functional balance. Changes in total score were evaluated across the three assessment time points.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Motor performance was assessed using the complete form of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2). The test includes eight motor subtests. The Total Motor Composite score was used in the analysis, with higher scores indicating better overall motor performance.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Chewing performance was assessed using the Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale, an observational classification ranging from 0 to 4. A score of 0 indicates normal and functional chewing performance, whereas a score of 4 indicates the most severe chewing impairment. Lower scores indicate better chewing performance. Changes in score were evaluated across the three assessment time points.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Eating behaviors were assessed using the parent-reported Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ), which consists of items rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Four subscales were evaluated in this study: Enjoyment of Food, Food Responsiveness, Emotional Undereating, and Food Fussiness. Each subscale was scored and analyzed separately; no overall or composite CEBQ score was calculated. Higher Enjoyment of Food and Food Responsiveness scores, and lower Emotional Undereating and Food Fussiness scores, were interpreted as more favorable changes in the context of this study. Changes in the four subscale scores were evaluated across the three assessment time points.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Sensory processing was assessed using the parent-reported Dunn Sensory Profile. Selected sensory pattern, sensory processing, and behavioral response subscales were evaluated. Each subscale was scored and analyzed separately; no overall composite score was calculated. Higher scores indicate that the behaviors described in the relevant sensory processing domain occur more frequently. Changes in the selected subscale scores were evaluated across the three assessment time points.
Uskudar University
Other
Evidence-Based Ketogenic Diet Applications in Individuals With ARX Gene Mutation and Epilepsy: An Occupational Therapy Perspective
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07689617
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Elâzığ, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05769634
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03373383
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07680842
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details