Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07721246

Simulation-Based Patient Education to Address Radiotherapy-Related Anxiety in Cancer Patients (ARAISE)

For the majority of cancer patients, radiotherapy is a crucial component of their treatment process. However, many patients experience anxiety before or during radiotherapy. This anxiety may be related not only to the cancer diagnosis and its prognosis but also to unfamiliar aspects of the treatment process, the equipment, and the treatment environment. General or non-specific feelings of anxiety may also become associated with the radiotherapy setting, even when patients are not able to identify a specific treatment-related concern. Uncertainty about what will happen during treatment sessions can further increase anxiety and may affect patients' overall well-being. The ARAISE project consists of two consecutive parts. In the first part, health care professionals from different disciplines and patient representatives take part in a Delphi consensus process to identify and prioritize the treatment-specific fears of patients receiving radiotherapy. The results of this first part are used to define the content of the education session that is tested in the second part. The second part is a randomized controlled study in patients receiving radiotherapy for cancer. Participants will be assigned by chance, in equal numbers, to one of two groups. All participants will receive the usual patient education provided before radiotherapy. In addition, participants in one group will receive a single immersive, simulation-based education session after the planning CT scan and before the start of treatment. The main question is whether the additional session leads to lower state anxiety at the first radiotherapy fraction compared with usual patient education alone. The study also compares state anxiety at other time points, health-related quality of life, and how well informed participants feel about their treatment. Finally, the study assesses whether the additional education session is feasible, well accepted, and practical to provide as part of routine radiotherapy care.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen

Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37075, Germany

Location contact

Rami El Shafie, Prof. Dr. med.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+49 5513964501

Rami El Shafie, Prof. Dr. med.

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stephan-Peter Landgraff, M.Ed.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+49 5513964501

About this study

Despite continued medical progress, cancer remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide. A significant number of cancer patients receive radiation therapy at some point during the treatment process, depending on the expected therapeutic benefit. The continued rise in the incidence of malignant diseases highlights the need to refine existing treatment pathways and integrate them into a comprehensive continuum of patient-centered care. A key component of these efforts is the systematic collection and assessment of the needs of patients in a growing and increasingly diverse patient population. In the field of radiation therapy, anxiety and psychological distress are clinically relevant factors that may have a lasting negative impact both on the subjective treatment experience and on treatment compliance, treatment preparation, and treatment quality. A large percentage of radiation therapy patients experience a level of psychological distress that is considered clinically significant and requires treatment. The resulting needs can be categorized into physical, psychological, and social dimensions, and the extent of the observed psychological distress varies significantly among different tumor types but essentially remains stable over the treatment course, with a slight tendency to decrease. Assessments of patient needs often differ among the professional groups participating in the therapy process. The currently standard practice of information counseling conducted by a physician alone is often insufficient to effectively address or alleviate existing treatment-related anxieties. The state-trait anxiety model developed by Charles Spielberger distinguishes between two different forms of anxiety. State anxiety describes a temporary emotional state associated with increased stimulation of the autonomic nervous system, and its intensity can fluctuate. In the context of radiation therapy, potential triggers may include the treatment machine with its specific sounds, the windowless treatment room with its heavy lead-lined door, and the inevitable situation in which the patient is alone during the treatment session. Trait anxiety, on the other hand, is a dispositional factor that represents a stable personality trait and describes the tendency to mistakenly assess objectively low-risk situations as threatening and to react with a disproportionately high level of anxiety. Both dimensions are relevant to the study context, as patients with pronounced trait anxiety generally react more strongly to stress-inducing situations, which in turn can manifest as increased state anxiety. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is the established tool for the standardized assessment of both dimensions. A validated German-language adaptation (STAI-G) is available. To address these fears, immersive simulation techniques that provide patient-oriented guidance and, as a result, offer more personalized, one-on-one counseling can be valuable in alleviating the anxiety. The ARAISE project addresses these gaps in two consecutive parts. The first study part is a Delphi consensus procedure comprising two to three rounds involving radiation therapists, psycho-oncologists, patient representatives, physicians, and users of the VERT simulation software. In this process, treatment-specific fears of patients undergoing radiation therapy are identified from a multiprofessional perspective and ranked by priority. Its results determine the content of the educational intervention evaluated in the second study part. The subsequent second study part is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled study with a 1-to-1 allocation ratio and a planned sample size of 144 patients. The participants in the control group receive standard counseling, provided prior to the start of radiation therapy. Participants in the intervention group will receive the same standard counseling, supplemented by a one-time, structured, simulation-based counseling session lasting 15 to 20 minutes, which will be conducted after the planning CT scan and before the first radiation therapy fraction. The session uses the immersive radiation therapy simulation software VERT 9.0 and is led by the principal investigator conducting the study, a medical educator with many years of clinical experience in radiation therapy. Assessments are performed at four time points: T0 (baseline before randomization), T1 (immediately after the planning CT or after the education session), T2 (first radiotherapy fraction), and T3 (fifth radiotherapy fraction). The primary endpoint is state anxiety at T2, measured with the STAI-G Form X1 and adjusted for the baseline value at T0. Secondary endpoints are state anxiety at T1 and T3, HRQoL at T3 (EORTC QLQ-C30), and the perceived amount of information received at T1 (EORTC QLQ-INFO25). Overall, ARAISE aims to develop and evaluate a patient-centered educational approach that may improve patients' preparation for radiotherapy and support the integration of their individual informational and psychological needs into routine care.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed malignant tumor disease
  • Stage I - III (UICC TNM classification)
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 2
  • Curative-intent external beam radiotherapy regimen with at least 5 fractions
  • First course of radiotherapy
  • Able to independently operate the electronic data collection instrument
  • Written informed consent after study information
  • Sufficient German language proficiency to read and complete the study questionnaires independently and without translation assistance

Exclusion criteria

  • Lack of capacity to provide informed consent
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Stereotactic radiotherapy
  • Emergency treatment indication
  • Acute suicidality, acute psychosis, or other acute psychiatric disorder
  • Initiation of or dose change in psychotropic medication within 4 weeks before baseline (T0)
  • Cognitive impairment that precludes independent completion of the questionnaires
  • Visual or auditory impairment that prevents perception of the on-screen or audio content despite available aids

Treatment and study plan

Simulation-Based Patient Education

Other

A single, standardized, simulation-based patient education session lasting 15 to 20 minutes, conducted in addition to the standard education session that takes place after the planning CT scan and before the first radiation therapy fraction. This session uses the immersive radiation therapy simulation software VERT 9.0 to visualize the treatment room, the linear accelerator, and the treatment process. In addition to illustrating the treatment process, targeted information is provided to address treatment-specific fears identified as priorities in the Delphi consensus. The session is conducted by the principal investigator following a standardized procedure to ensure comparability among participants. The prescribed oncological treatment and routine radiation therapy remain unchanged.

Primary outcomes

  1. State anxiety at the first radiotherapy fraction (STAI-G Form X1)

    Time frame: First radiotherapy fraction (T2), approximately 2 weeks after randomization

    State anxiety at the first radiotherapy fraction (T2), measured with the state scale (Form X1) of the German version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-G). The sum score comprises 20 items and ranges from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety. The adjusted between-group difference in means at T2 is analyzed by analysis of covariance with the baseline state anxiety score at T0 as a continuous covariate and dichotomized trait anxiety at T0 as a factor. The effect measure is the adjusted mean difference with a 95% confidence interval.

Secondary outcomes

  1. State anxiety after the planning CT or education session (STAI-G Form X1)

    Time frame: T1, immediately after the planning CT or after the education session, approximately 1 week after randomization

    State anxiety at T1, measured with the state scale (Form X1) of the German version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-G). Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety. Analyzed by analysis of covariance with the baseline state anxiety score at T0 as a continuous covariate and dichotomized trait anxiety at T0 as a factor.

  2. State anxiety at the fifth radiotherapy fraction (STAI-G Form X1)

    Time frame: Fifth radiotherapy fraction (T3), approximately 3 weeks after randomization

    State anxiety at T3, measured with the state scale (Form X1) of the German version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-G). Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety. Analyzed by analysis of covariance with the baseline state anxiety score at T0 as a continuous covariate and dichotomized trait anxiety at T0 as a factor.

  3. Health-related quality of life: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Time frame: Fifth radiotherapy fraction (T3), approximately 3 weeks after randomization

    Health-related quality of life at T3, measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and linearly transformed to a score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a greater global health status and quality of life. Analyzed by analysis of covariance with group as a factor, the T0 Global Health Status/Quality of Life score as a continuous covariate, and dichotomized trait anxiety at T0 as a factor. Functioning and symptom scales are reported descriptively only.

  4. Perceived amount of information received: "Information about the treatment" scale (EORTC QLQ-INFO25)

    Time frame: T1, immediately after the planning CT or after the education session, approximately 1 week after randomization

    Perceived amount of information received at T1, measured with the multi-item scale "Information about the treatment" (items 38 to 43) of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 and linearly transformed to a score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a greater perceived amount of information. Groups are compared in a linear model with group as a factor and dichotomized trait anxiety at T0 as the only adjustment variable. The remaining multi-item scales, single items, the total score, and the assessment at T2 are reported descriptively.

  5. Feasibility of the simulation-based patient education intervention

    Time frame: From enrollment to the fifth radiotherapy fraction (T3), approximately 3 weeks per participant

    Composite descriptive endpoint with target values defined a priori: recruitment rate of at least 50%, retention rate of at least 80% at T3, protocol adherence of at least 90%, data completeness of at least 85% from T0 to T3, and tolerability defined as discontinuation due to intervention-associated distress reactions in no more than 10% of participants. All rates are reported with two-sided 95% confidence intervals. No formal hypothesis testing is performed.

Other outcomes

  1. Moderation of the intervention effect on state anxiety at T2 by trait anxiety

    Time frame: First radiotherapy fraction (T2), approximately 2 weeks after randomization

    Dispositional trait anxiety is measured once at baseline (T0) with the trait scale (Form X2) of the German version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-G) and dichotomized at a threshold of 40 points or higher. The group-by-trait-anxiety interaction term is tested in the analysis of covariance model of the primary endpoint (state anxiety at T2). Dichotomized trait anxiety additionally serves as a stratification factor for randomization and as a prognostic factor in all analyses of state anxiety. This analysis is not independently powered and is interpreted as hypothesis-generating.

  2. Effect modification of the primary endpoint by prespecified participant and treatment characteristics

    Time frame: First radiotherapy fraction (T2), approximately 2 weeks after randomization

    Effect modification of state anxiety at T2 by irradiation site (central nervous system, head and neck, breast, thorax, abdomen, pelvis), sex, educational level, and concomitant systemic therapy, assessed via the respective interaction terms with treatment allocation in the model of the primary endpoint. These analyses are not independently powered and are interpreted as hypothesis-generating.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Rami El Shafie, Prof. Dr. med

CONTACT

[email protected]

+49 551 3964501

Stephan-Peter Landgraff, M.Ed.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+49 30 76 68 37 5 600

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Medical Center Goettingen

Other

Collaborators

  • Medical School Berlin

Registry information

Official study title

Addressing Radiotherapy Anxiety Through Immersive Simulation and Education: Effects of a Simulation-Based Patient Education Intervention on Psychosocial Burden in Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy (ARAISE)

Acronym: ARAISE

Important dates

Study start
2028
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2030
First posted
Jul 23, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 11, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.