School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, United Kingdom
Nottingham, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT07652320
Bread remains one of the most widely consumed staple foods worldwide, with wheat flour serving as its traditional foundation. However, the widespread dependence on refined wheat-based bread has paralleled the rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D), partly owing to its high glycaemic index (GI), which results in rapid increases in blood glucose levels. Enhancing the nutritional quality of bread, therefore, represents an important target for dietary intervention.
Developing alternative flour blends for bread production presents a potential strategy for improving glycaemic control and supporting glucose homeostasis. Accordingly, this clinical trial aims to determine whether the partial replacement of wheat flour with legume flours, including chickpea, pea, and lentil, in Arabic bread formulations can lower glycaemic responses compared with traditional Arabic wheat bread.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Nottingham, United Kingdom
This study will be a crossover trial. Participants living with overweight and obesity will be recruited and fully informed about the study before giving informed consent. Eligible participants will attend the University of Nottingham on 4 separate visits following an overnight fast of at least 10 hours. On each visit, participants will consume one of three Arabic bread formulations or a control, with a one-week washout between visits. Each bread sample will provide an equivalent of 50 g of available carbohydrate:
The primary focus of this study is the comparison between the control bread and the chickpea-enriched bread, as chickpea flour represents the main intervention. The pea-enriched bread and lentil-enriched variants are included as optional secondary comparisons to provide additional insights into the broader effect of legume flour substitution on glycaemic response.
Study Visits:
The procedures for each visit are summarised below:
Gastrointestinal symptoms will also be monitored via a brief self-reported questionnaire at baseline and post-consumption.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Arabic bread prepared with 100% wheat flour, providing an equivalent of 50g of available carbohydrate.
Arabic bread prepared with 30% chickpea flour and 70% wheat flour, providing an equivalent of 50g available carbohydrate.
(This is the primary experimental comparison)
Arabic bread prepared with 30% pea flour and 70% wheat flour, providing an equivalent of 50g available carbohydrate.
(Optional secondary comparison)
Arabic bread prepared with 30% lentil flour and 70% wheat flour, providing an equivalent of 50g available carbohydrate.
(Optional secondary comparison)
Time frame: 120 minutes
Differences in the iAUC for capillary blood glucose will be compared between bread formulations.
Time frame: 120 minutes
Differences in the peak capillary blood glucose value after consuming each bread formulation.
Time frame: 120 minutes
Appetite sensations (hunger, fullness, desire to eat sweet foods, desire to eat salty foods, desire to eat fatty foods, and desire to eat savoury foods) will be assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range from 0 to 100 mm. Higher scores indicate greater intensity of the appetite sensation being measured (e.g., greater hunger, fullness, or desire to eat).
Time frame: Immediately after consumption
Sensory acceptability of each Arabic bread sample will be assessed using a 9-Point Hedonic Scale. Scores range from 1 to 9, with higher scores indicating greater liking and sensory acceptability across sensory attributes, including overall liking, colour, aroma, flavour, texture, chewability, roundness, and crumb characteristics.
Time frame: 24 hours
Total energy intake, macronutrient intake until midnight after product consumption.
Trial opening soon.
Get NotifiedUniversity of Nottingham
Other
Glycaemic Response to Arabic Bread Formulated With Alternative Flour Blends: A Comparison With Arabic Wheat Bread
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07792954
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07803705
Body Weight, Fatty Pancreas
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07808073
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07826754
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Tunis, Boulifa, Tunisia
View Trial Details