Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07578324

TENS During Transperineal Prostate Biopsy

Transperineal prostate biopsy is a safe and effective method of diagnosing prostate cancer. When performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting, it can cause significant pain, particularly during the periprostatic nerve block - the injection of local anaesthetic around the prostate. Better pain management during this procedure may improve patient comfort and encourage wider use of the transperineal approach.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-invasive, low-cost method of pain relief that works by delivering mild electrical impulses through the skin. A preceding pilot study at our centre (n=84) found that TENS used alongside local anaesthesia was associated with significantly lower pain scores during periprostatic nerve block and biopsy sampling, with no device-related complications.

This study aims to confirm these findings in a larger, formally powered, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active TENS or sham TENS (electrodes applied but no electrical current delivered) in addition to standard local anaesthesia. Neither the participant nor the operating urologist will know which group the participant is in. Pain scores are written down by the participant himself, so nobody asks him for a number during the procedure. Stimulation may feel strong, weak or not noticeable at all, and feeling nothing does not mean a participant is in the inactive group.

Pain intensity will be assessed at four stages of the procedure using a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Participants will be followed up at 30 days after the biopsy.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Urology, Medical University of Gdansk

Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-214, Poland

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Bartłomiej Marczak, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+48 790 710 909

About this study

This is a single-centre, prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, two-parallel-group superiority trial. It builds on a preceding single-centre randomized sham-controlled pilot (TENS 1, n=84, 1:1:1 allocation to active TENS, sham TENS and local anaesthesia alone), which demonstrated large effect sizes for TENS-associated pain reduction during periprostatic nerve block and biopsy sampling, with no difference between sham and local anaesthesia alone at any stage and no device-related adverse events. The pilot was retrospectively registered, was explicitly hypothesis-generating and had no formal power calculation. The present trial addresses each of these limitations: it is prospectively registered, formally powered against a pre-specified minimum clinically important difference, and restricted to two arms on the basis of the pilot finding that sham stimulation is an inert control condition.

Stimulation is delivered through a single channel using two electrodes placed paraperineally, one on each side, so that the current path crosses the perineum transversely over the S2 to S4 dermatomes, corresponding to the pudendal innervation of the perineum and the periprostatic region. The single-centre design is deliberate: all biopsies are performed at one institution using the same fusion platform, the same local anaesthesia technique and the same stimulation protocol as the pilot, which minimises inter-operator and inter-centre variability and preserves methodological continuity, at an acknowledged cost to external validity.

Pain scores are self-recorded by the participant on a paper form at fixed procedural stages, each announced in standardised wording by the operator, who is blinded to allocation. No member of the study team asks the participant for a pain score at any point. This differs from the pilot, in which scores were collected verbally, and the change is accounted for when pilot and trial effect sizes are compared.

Sample size is not based on the pilot effect estimate, because effect sizes from small pilot trials are systematically inflated. The planning scenario uses the pre-specified minimum clinically important difference of 1.5 NRS points with an assumed standard deviation of 2.0 (Cohen's d = 0.75), a two-sided alpha of 0.05, a Mann-Whitney U test and an asymptotic relative efficiency adjustment of 0.955. The trial adopts 60 evaluable participants per group, which provides 80% power for effects of d = 0.52 or larger and retains 76% power in a conservative robustness scenario of d = 0.50. Recruitment is inflated for dropout and non-evaluable primary outcomes. No interim analysis is planned.

The primary analysis is by intention-to-treat and uses a two-sided Mann-Whitney U test, with the Hodges-Lehmann estimate of median difference and 95% confidence interval reported alongside rank-biserial correlation and epsilon-squared for comparability with the pilot. A per-protocol sensitivity analysis excludes major deviations. A primary outcome missing because of discontinuation before the nerve block is handled by worst-case imputation, with best-case imputation as a secondary sensitivity analysis. Secondary analyses are presented without multiplicity correction and interpreted as supportive rather than confirmatory. Blinding integrity is quantified using the James index reported overall and the Bang index reported separately for each arm; these analyses are descriptive and do not modify the primary analysis. A separate statistical analysis plan is locked before database lock and unblinding.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male patients aged 40 years or older
  • Indication for prostate biopsy: elevated serum PSA (as per institutional protocol and EAU guidelines) or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE)
  • Suspicious lesion on multiparametric MRI classified as PI-RADS score 3 or higher (version 2.1)
  • Scheduled for transperineal MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior treatment for prostate cancer (surgical, radiotherapy, hormonal or focal therapy)
  • Contraindications to TENS: cutaneous damage or dermatologic conditions at electrode application sites; cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD); uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia or congestive heart failure; history of epilepsy or seizure disorder; metallic implants near the stimulation site; malignancy at or near the stimulation site
  • Contraindications to transperineal biopsy: active urinary tract infection; bleeding disorder or ongoing anticoagulation not amendable to bridging; anatomical abnormalities preventing safe prostatic access
  • Known allergy or intolerance to local anaesthetic agents or biopsy-related materials
  • Severe comorbidities or unstable medical condition compromising procedural safety
  • Inability to complete questionnaires
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial within 30 days prior to enrolment

Treatment and study plan

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

Device

Cefar Rehab X2 device (Class II, Type BF). Symmetrical biphasic compensated pulse; 80 Hz; 180 µs pulse duration; amplitude individually titrated. Two 5x5 cm electrodes in perineal region. Initiated 3-5 minutes before local anaesthesia, continued throughout procedure.

Sham Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Device

Identical electrode placement to active group. Device activated without delivering electrical current. Indistinguishable from active TENS by participant, operator, and outcome assessor.

Primary outcomes

  1. NRS Pain Score During Periprostatic Nerve Block

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of periprostatic nerve block (intraoperative)

    Patient-reported pain intensity during periprostatic nerve block (PNB), assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain). PNB consists of periprostatic infiltration ( 10 mL 1% lignocaine under real-time ultrasound guidance). The participant self-records the score on a paper form on a clipboard, within 30 seconds of the operator announcing completion of the block in fixed wording, and before the next procedural stage begins. The operator is blinded to allocation and asks no question about pain. A standardised explanation of the NRS and of the form is given to every participant before the procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. NRS Pain Score During Ultrasound Probe Insertion

    Time frame: Immediately after ultrasound probe insertion (intraoperative)

    NRS (0-10) assessed within 30 seconds of probe placement, before local anaesthesia administration begins.

  2. NRS Pain Score During Perineal Infiltration

    Time frame: Immediately after perineal infiltration (intraoperative)

    NRS (0-10) assessed within 30 seconds of completion of perineal skin and subcutaneous tissue local anaesthetic infiltration.

  3. NRS Pain Score During Biopsy Sampling

    Time frame: Immediately after fusion-targeted biopsy sampling (intraoperative)

    NRS (0-10) assessed within 30 seconds of the last biopsy core being obtained.

  4. Procedural Safety and Tolerability

    Time frame: Through 30-day follow-up

    Incidence and severity of adverse events classified per Clavien-Dindo grading system.

  5. Willingness to Repeat the Procedure

    Time frame: 30-day follow-up visit

    Single question (yes/no/unsure) assessing patient willingness to undergo the same procedure in the future.

  6. Blinding Integrity - James Blinding Index

    Time frame: Immediately after biopsy sampling, before unblinding

    Immediately after biopsy sampling and before unblinding, the participant self-records on the same paper form which group he believes he was allocated to (active / sham / no opinion), with a certainty rating (1-5). The James blinding index is reported overall and the Bang blinding index separately for each arm, each with 95% confidence intervals.

  7. Operator Satisfaction

    Time frame: Immediately after procedure

    Single-item Likert scale (1-5, where 1 = very dissatisfied and 5 = very satisfied with procedural conditions), recorded by the operating urologist immediately after the procedure, assessing overall satisfaction with procedural conditions during the biopsy.

  8. Patient Satisfaction

    Time frame: Immediately after procedure

    Single-item Likert scale (1-5, where 1 = very dissatisfied and 5 = very satisfied), recorded immediately after procedure self-recorded by the participant on the paper form immediately after the procedure

  9. Blinding Integrity - Operator

    Time frame: Immediately after each procedure and before leaving the room, the operating urologist records which group he believes the participant was allocated to (active / sham / no opinion), with a certainty rating (1-5).

  10. procedure duration

    Time frame: Intraoperative, from probe insertion to last biopsy core

Other outcomes

  1. Preoperative state anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory - State subscale, STAI-S)

    Time frame: Administered before the procedure.

    State anxiety assessed once before the procedure using the State subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S; Spielberger et al., 1983; validated Polish adaptation by Wrześniewski, Sosnowski, Jaworowska & Fecenec, Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych). The STAI-S comprises 20 items rated 1-4; total score ranges from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety. Reported as the mean score per arm.

  2. NRS-Anxiety

    Time frame: Administered before the procedure and immediately after biopsy sampling to assess pre-to-post procedural anxiety change.

    NRS-Anxiety (0-10; single item: "How anxious are you right now?"). Administered before the procedure and immediately after biopsy sampling to assess pre-to-post procedural anxiety change. Pre-to-post delta reported as exploratory outcome.

  3. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-13)

    Time frame: Before the procedure

    Pain Catastrophizing Scale (Sullivan et al., Psychol Assess 1995;7:524-532). 13-item self-report questionnaire, score 0-52. Three subscales: rumination, magnification, helplessness. Polish version available. Administered before the procedure as covariate for primary outcome analysis.

  4. TENS Amplitude vs Pain Reduction

    Time frame: Intraoperative (active group only)

    Actual TENS amplitude used (mA) recorded for each participant in the active group. Spearman correlation between amplitude and NRS reduction during PNB.

  5. Change in single-item anxiety (NRS-anxiety, 0-10) from baseline (pre-procedure) to immediately post-procedure

    Time frame: Baseline (immediately before the procedure) and immediately after completion of biopsy sampling (Day 0)

    Procedural anxiety measured with a single-item numeric rating scale (NRS-anxiety: "How anxious are you right now?"; 0 = not at all anxious, 10 = the most anxious imaginable). Assessed at two time points: immediately before the procedure (baseline) and immediately after completion of biopsy sampling. The pre-to-post change (post minus baseline; range -10 to +10, with negative values indicating reduced anxiety) is the reported metric and is compared between the TENS and sham-TENS arms. Reported as the mean change per arm.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Bartłomiej Marczak, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+48 790 710 909

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Gdansk

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation as an Adjunct to Local Anaesthesia During Transperineal MRI-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Triple-Blind Sham-Controlled Trial

Acronym: TENS 2

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
May 11, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.