Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT07558304
Malignant hilar biliary obstruction is a condition in which the bile ducts near the liver become blocked due to cancer. This blockage can lead to jaundice (yellowing of the skin and eyes), itching, infection, and impaired liver function. To relieve the obstruction, doctors commonly perform procedures to drain bile and restore its flow.
There are different techniques available for biliary drainage. One common method is percutaneous transpapillary internal-external drainage, in which a catheter is placed through the liver and across the natural opening of the bile duct into the intestine. Another approach is percutaneous suprapapillary drainage using a self-expanding metal stent, which allows bile to drain without crossing into the intestine and may reduce the risk of contamination and infection.
Currently, there is no clear consensus on which of these two techniques is safer or more effective for patients with malignant proximal biliary obstruction. Some studies suggest that avoiding manipulation of the intestinal opening of the bile duct may reduce complications such as infection, but high-quality comparative evidence is lacking.
The purpose of this study is to compare percutaneous suprapapillary drainage with a self-expanding metal stent versus routine percutaneous transpapillary internal-external drainage in patients with malignant proximal biliary obstruction. The study aims to compare the rate of drainage-related complications between the two techniques, as well as to evaluate treatment success, stent patency, and the need for reintervention. In addition, in patients with potentially resectable disease undergoing preoperative biliary drainage, the study will assess and compare surgical outcomes between the two approaches. The results of this study may help determine the safest and most effective drainage strategy for these patients and improve future clinical decision-making.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903, Brazil
Malignant hilar biliary obstruction is most commonly associated with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and represents a complex clinical condition characterized by impaired bile flow at or above the hepatic duct confluence. The resulting cholestasis may lead to progressive hepatic dysfunction, increased risk of infectious complications, and reduced tolerance to systemic or surgical therapies. In selected patients, preoperative biliary drainage is performed to optimize liver function and reduce perioperative risk prior to major hepatectomy.
Percutaneous biliary drainage is widely used in this setting due to its ability to selectively decompress specific hepatic segments, particularly in complex hilar strictures. The conventional approach consists of transpapillary internal-external drainage, in which a catheter is advanced across the obstruction and through the papilla into the duodenum. While effective in achieving biliary decompression, this technique may disrupt the function of the sphincter of Oddi and facilitate duodenobiliary reflux, which has been implicated as a potential mechanism for infectious complications.
Percutaneous suprapapillary drainage with placement of a self-expanding metal stent represents an alternative strategy. By avoiding transpapillary manipulation, this approach preserves sphincter function and may reduce bacterial contamination of the biliary tree. Early clinical data suggest a favorable safety profile, particularly regarding infectious outcomes; however, direct comparisons with conventional transpapillary drainage remain limited, and available studies are constrained by methodological limitations.
An additional area of uncertainty relates to patients with potentially resectable disease. In this subgroup, the choice of drainage technique may influence not only peri-procedural outcomes but also subsequent surgical management. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential impact of metallic stents on operative complexity and resectability, although robust data are lacking.
This randomized clinical trial is designed to compare two percutaneous drainage strategies within a standardized institutional framework. Patients with an indication for percutaneous biliary drainage will be allocated to receive either transpapillary internal-external drainage or suprapapillary drainage with a self-expanding metal stent. The study includes both patients with unresectable disease and those with potentially resectable malignancies, allowing for evaluation across different clinical scenarios.
All procedures will be performed by experienced interventional radiologists using uniform technical protocols, and patients will be managed according to institutional standards of care. Follow-up will include clinical, laboratory, and imaging assessment as appropriate to routine practice.
The study is designed to generate comparative evidence regarding the safety and performance of these two techniques. In addition, a prespecified subgroup analysis will focus on patients with potentially resectable cholangiocarcinoma undergoing preoperative biliary drainage, in order to explore the impact of drainage strategy on subsequent surgical outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
5.1 Estimated future liver remnant <40%, in whom percutaneous portal vein embolization of the side to be resected will also be indicated after initial drainage.
5.2 Prolonged jaundice with total bilirubin >10 mg/dL for more than 14 days. 5.3 Malnutrition, defined as ≥10% unintentional weight loss or albumin <3 g/dL, presumably attributable to cholestasis.
5.4 Indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Exclusion criteria
Percutaneous biliary drainage performed by advancing a catheter across the biliary obstruction and through the papilla into the duodenum, allowing internal and external bile drainage.
Other names: Intervention 1
Percutaneous biliary drainage performed by placing a self-expanding metal stent across the biliary obstruction without crossing the papilla.
Other names: Intervention 2
Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention
Defined by clinical criteria, including fever (axillary temperature >38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count >10,000/mm³), in the absence of another infectious source on abdominal and chest imaging.
Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention
Defined by radiological evidence of cholecystitis associated with fever (axillary temperature >38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count >10,000/mm³).
Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention
Defined by the presence of at least two of the following criteria: abdominal pain consistent with pancreatitis, elevation of amylase and/or lipase greater than three times the upper limit of normal, or characteristic imaging findings.
Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention
Defined as intra-abdominal bile leakage due to biliary perforation or at the hepatic puncture site, confirmed by imaging.
Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention
Defined as clinical or radiological evidence of bleeding requiring blood transfusion or reintervention.
Time frame: Within 30 days after intervention
Defined as a decrease in total bilirubin to <3 mg/dL or a reduction of more than 50% compared to pre-drainage levels
Time frame: Within 90 days after intervention
All-cause mortality following biliary drainage.
Time frame: Within 30 days after intervention
Requirement for additional percutaneous or endoscopic procedures
Time frame: Within 180 days of intervention
Number of patients from group A (patients with potentially resectable neoplasms) who undergo potentially curative surgery
Time frame: Within 90 days of curative surgery
Surgical mortality in patients from Group A (patients with potentially ressectable neoplasms) who undergo potentially curative surgery
Time frame: Within 90 days of curative surgery
Surgical morbidity in patients from Group A (patients with potentially ressectable neoplasms) who undergo potentially curative surgery according to Clavien-Dindo classification
Time frame: Within 90 days of curative surgery
Incidence of postoperative liver failure in patients from Group A (patients with potentially ressectable neoplasms) who undergo potentially resectable surgery
Time frame: Within 180 days of intervention
Duration of stent patency in patients from group B (patients not candidates for potentially curative resection)
Trial opening soon.
Get NotifiedHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Other
Randomized Clinical Trial of Suprapapillary Drainage With Metal Stent vs. Routine Internal-External Transpapillary Drainage in Patients With Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction
Acronym: SMART-B
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05286814
Adenocarcinoma, Adrenal Cortex Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07729917
Adenocarcinoma, Bile Duct Carcinoma
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06175845
Adenocarcinoma, Bile Duct Cancer
Hamburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT01915225
Adenocarcinoma, Bile Duct Cancer
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details