Tecnológico de Antioquia
Guarne, Antioquia, 054080, Colombia
NCT Number: NCT07448012
This single-arm field evaluation examined whether a brief, structured team reflection routine embedded within usual elite underwater rugby training was associated with change in team cohesion, psychological safety, peer trust, and team identification across three measurement occasions. Twenty-five male athletes contributed at least one assessment. Baseline responses were recorded on 16-17 February 2026 (T0), midpoint responses after session 6 on 5-9 March 2026 (T1), and endpoint responses after session 12 on 18 March 2026 (T2). The registered plan anticipated 16 sessions over six weeks; operational delivery concluded after 12 sessions, and no later follow-up was conducted.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Guarne, Antioquia, 054080, Colombia
The intervention consisted of brief, structured team-reflection conversations embedded within the squad's usual training environment. The routine used concise prompts, turn-taking, and a 'share-only' rule that prohibited interruption, rebuttal, blame, selection discussion, and cross-talk.. Sessions were intended to close with an observable cue, rule, norm, or micro-habit for subsequent training.
The registered plan anticipated 16 sessions over six weeks. Operational delivery concluded after 12 sessions. Assessments were completed at T0 (16-17 February 2026), T1 after session 6 (5-9 March 2026), and T2 after session 12 (18 March 2026). No later follow-up was conducted.
The retained study file contains outcome responses but no complete nominal record of attendance, actual session duration, facilitator fidelity, protocol deviations, training availability, injury, or illness. Accordingly, no attendance percentage, fidelity percentage, dose-response analysis, or injury/availability result is claimed. Objective sport-performance outcomes were not collected.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Twelve brief, structured team-reflection sessions were embedded within usual elite underwater rugby training. Athletes responded to concise prompts in turn under a 'share-only' rule that prohibited interruption, rebuttal, blame, selection discussion, and cross-talk. Sessions normally closed with an observable cue, rule, norm, or micro-habit for the next training experience. The registered plan anticipated 16 sessions; operational delivery concluded after session 12.
Time frame: Baseline 16-17 February 2026 (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes); T1: 5-9 March 2026 (after session 6; T1; up to 5 minutes) and T2: 18 March 2026 (after session 12; post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)
Team cohesion measured using the Spanish 12-item short form of the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ). Items are rated on a 1-9 scale; negatively keyed items are reverse-scored. A composite cohesion score is computed as the mean of items, with higher scores indicating greater perceived cohesion.
Time frame: Baseline 16-17 February 2026 (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes); T1: 5-9 March 2026 (after session 6; T1; up to 5 minutes) and T2: 18 March 2026 (after session 12; post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)
Psychological safety assessed with the 7-item Team Psychological Safety scale. Items are answered on a 1-7 Likert-type response format; negatively keyed items are reverse-scored. A composite psychological safety score is computed as the mean of the 7 items, with higher scores indicating greater perceived psychological safety within the team.
Time frame: Baseline 16-17 February 2026 (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes); T1: 5-9 March 2026 (after session 6; T1; up to 5 minutes) and T2: 18 March 2026 (after session 12; post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)
Peer trust within the squad assessed using a 4-item team-referent horizontal trust measure drawn from the HERO organisational trust framework. Items are answered on a 0-6 response scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). A composite peer trust score is computed as the mean of the 4 items, with higher values indicating greater perceived horizontal (peer) trust among teammates.
Time frame: Baseline 16-17 February 2026 (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes); T1: 5-9 March 2026 (after session 6; T1; up to 5 minutes) and T2: 18 March 2026 (after session 12; post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)
Team identification assessed using a 6-item team-referent identification measure adapted from Mael & Ashforth. Items are answered on a 1-7 Likert-type response format. A composite identification score is computed as the mean of the 6 items, with higher scores indicating stronger identification with the team.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeÉdison Andrés Pérez Bedoya
Other
Brief Structured Team Reflection Embedded in Elite Underwater Rugby Training: A Three-Wave Field Evaluation of Cohesion, Psychological Safety, Peer Trust, and Team Identification
Acronym: BSTR-UWR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07597460
Behavior, Child Health
Santiago, Chile
View Trial DetailsNCT07559487
Biomechanical Parameters, Sports
Guarne, Antioquia, Colombia
View Trial DetailsNCT07200219
Achievement, Athlete
Aksaray, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07105462
Eye Movements, Psychomotor Performance
Taichung, Taiwan
View Trial Details