Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07418112
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a low-power holmium laser works to treat large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones in adults. It will also learn about the safety of the low-wattage holmium laser. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is the low-power holmium laser effective at treating large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones? Is the low-power holmium laser effective safe to use in adults? How does the low-power holmium laser compare to electrohydraulic lithotripsy for the management of large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones.
Participants will:
Undergo ERCP procedure and their bile duct or pancreatic duct stone will either be broken up with the low-power holmium laser lithotripsy device or the electrohydraulic lithotripsy lithotripsy device.
Answer a call 30 days after the procedure to document symptoms and/or any side effects.
Interested in participating?
Request Info19 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Location status: Recruiting
This study aims to assess two main questions. 1: Whether low-wattage holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy (using the Quanta System Litho EVO device) is safe and effective in the management large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones. 2: Whether low-wattage holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy is non-inferior to electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the management of large and/or difficult gallstones.
Part one of the study will investigate whether utilizing the low-wattage holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy device via single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC-LL) is safe and effective to treat large and/or difficult choledocholithiasis or pancreaticolithiasis.
Part two of the study will be a non-inferiority study to determine if SOC-LL is non-inferior for stone clearance, among other secondary outcomes, compared to electrohydraulic lithotripsy via single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC-EHL).
Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will undergo ERCP procedures and will either undergo SOC-LL or SOC-EHL to treat their large and/or difficult choledocholithiasis or pancreaticolithiasis. Stone clearance and other procedural or safety measures will be assessed after the procedure. The patient will be monitored after the procedure for adverse events and the administration of medications or admission to the hospital will be determined by the proceduralist. Roughly 30 days after the procedure the patient will be called to assess for any adverse effects as well as to determine symptom resolution.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Use of low-wattage holmium laser for lithotripsy of large and/or difficult bile duct stones or pancreatic duct stones during ERCP.
Other names: laser lithotripsy, lithotripsy
Use of electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones.
Other names: EHL
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Complete stone clearance is defined as the lithotripsy and clearance of ductal stone fragments as confirmed on cholangiogram or pancreaticogram at the end of the index/first procedure of the study.
Time frame: Immediately after the final procedure
This describes the rate of complete stone clearance at the end of the final procedure required to completely clear stones, regardless of the number of procedures required to do so.
Time frame: Immediately after the final procedure
Describes the number of ERCP procedures required to achieve complete stone clearance.
Time frame: Immediately after the final procedure
Total duration of index ERCP procedure. Will also document total procedural time for all necessary ERCPs to achieve stone clearance.
Time frame: Immediately after the final procedure
Duration of the activation time for either the laser lithotripsy or the electrohydraulic lithotripsy devices during the study duration.
Time frame: Immediately after the final procedure
Describes the percentage/rate of time that the patient requires rescue mechanical lithotripsy after failure of the primary modality (SOC-LL or SOC-EHL).
Time frame: Immediately after the final procedure
Describes the amount of time in days the patient spent in the hospital after any and all required procedures to achieve complete stone clearance.
Interested in participating?
Request InfoRush University Medical Center
Other
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Versus Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Difficult Choledocholithiasis and Pancreatic Duct Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07001423
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Tract Diseases
Espoo, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT07814976
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Tract Diseases
Riga, Latvia
View Trial DetailsNCT05141916
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Disease
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07407491
Acute Cholangitis, Bile Duct Diseases
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
View Trial Details