NYU Langone Health
New York, 10016, United States
NCT Number: NCT07217613
The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of early postoperative skin complications including allergic contact dermatitis, blistering, and erythema between silk fibroin incision dressings and cyanoacrylate closure in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me14 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
New York, 10016, United States
This is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial conducted at a single academic medical center comparing a silk fibroin adhesive incision dressing (SYLKE) to a cyanoacrylate-based skin closure system (Dermabond or Prineo) in patients undergoing primary or revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Participants are randomized 1:1 using a computer-generated allocation sequence stratified by operating surgeon. Wound closure is standardized across all participants prior to dressing application, ensuring that deep and dermal closure are identical between groups and independent of allocation.
The primary outcome is the incidence of early postoperative skin complications, including allergic contact dermatitis, blistering, erythema, and other incision-related complications, assessed at the first postoperative visit (7-14 days). Secondary outcomes include patient-reported comfort, itch, incision-site pain, satisfaction, and rehabilitation interference at approximately 30 days; dressing-related complications requiring clinical intervention through 30 days, captured via blinded electronic medical record review; and scar quality at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS v2.0), with the observer component scored by one unblinded clinical assessor and two fully blinded independent raters.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Applied sterile, hydrophobic, hypoallergenic dressing remains in place for 14-21 days, unless removal is clinically indicated (e.g., saturation, detachment, suspected allergic contact dermatitis, or at provider discretion).
Other names: SYLKE®, SYLKE Inc.
Applied per standard NYU practice; dressing remains in place per routine protocol.
Other names: Dermabond®, Prineo®
Time frame: Follow-up 1 (7-14 days postoperatively)
Incidence of allergic contact dermatitis, blistering, erythema, or other incision-related complications, assessed by the clinical team.
Time frame: Approximately 30 days postoperatively
Participants will complete a 0-10 VAS rating for incision site comfort.
Time frame: approximately 30 days postoperatively
Participants will complete a 0-10 VAS rating for itch.
Time frame: approximately 30 days postoperatively
A 5-point Likert scale (none to extreme) will assess the perceived impact of incision-related discomfort on physical therapy participation and return to activity.
Time frame: approximately 30 days postoperatively
Patients will complete a 0-10 VAS rating for incision site pain.
Time frame: approximately 30 days postoperatively
Patients will complete a 0-10 VAS rating for satisfaction with the incision dressing.
Time frame: 3 Months Post-Operatively
POSAS v2.0 evaluates scar quality across pigmentation, pliability, thickness, and overall cosmetic outcome (6 items, 1-10 each; total 6-60, where 6 = normal skin and 60 = worst imaginable scar). The patient component is self-reported by the participant. The observer component is scored by one unblinded clinical assessor and two fully blinded independent raters; observer item-level scores are averaged across raters, with a pre-specified sensitivity analysis using only the two blinded raters.
Time frame: approximately 30 days postoperatively
An independent, blinded review of 30-day wound-related events performed by a separate team member via EMR review.
NYU Langone Health
Other
Prospective Evaluation of Silk Fibroin Versus 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Incision Dressings Following ACL Reconstruction
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05012982
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Milford, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07532980
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Knee Injuries
Konya, Karatay, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07601529
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07540715
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details