Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo archival tissue and/or blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT07125729
This clinical trial compares minimal residual disease (MRD) testing with the Haystack blood test (assay) to the Signatera® assay for the early detection of the cancer returning (cancer recurrence) in patients with stage II-IV colorectal cancer (CRC) that can be removed by surgery (resectable). MRD testing looks for evidence of remaining tumor following treatment that is only apparent using highly sensitive techniques. There are few effective tools available outside of imaging to identify CRC patients with MRD who may be at the highest risk for cancer recurrence after surgery. Early detection of CRC recurrence after surgery is important, as it may increase the chance of curative (ability to cure) outcomes for patients with cancer recurrence. Currently, the Signatera assay is used to monitor whether CRC recurs after surgery, however it is not a very sensitive test. Early work with the Haystack assay suggests it may be more sensitive than the Signatera assay, which may be more effective for the early detection of cancer recurrence in patients with resectable stage II-IV CRC.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
CTCA at Western Regional Medical Center, Goodyear, Arizona, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare the clinical performance of the Haystack MRD test and the Signatera® test in patients with stage II-IV CRC patients treated with curative intent surgery with or without adjuvant therapy.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To calculate the lead time (months) of recurrence detection by the Haystack MRD test in curatively resected colorectal cancer patients to 1) radiological recurrence time 2) Signatera® test positivity.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. To explore the performance of up to two cancer detection assays (BestSEEK and enACT) in development by Dr. Tomasetti at City of Hope - Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen) and City of Hope.
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo archival tissue and blood sample collection and Haystack MRD and Signatera circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA)/cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) testing prior to standard of care (SOC) surgical resection. Patients then undergo blood sample collection and Haystack MRD and Signatera ctDNA/cfDNA testing 3-10 weeks after surgery, every 3 months for 2 years post-surgery, and then every 6 months for years 3-5 post-surgery in the absence of disease progression.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo archival tissue and/or blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo Haystack MRD and Signatera ctDNA/cfDNA testing
Other names: Cell-Free DNA/Circulating Tumor DNA Measurement, cfDNA/ctdDNA Measurement, cfDNA/ctDNA, cfDNA/ctDNA Measurement, Circulating Cell-Free DNA/Circulating Tumor-Derived DNA Measurement
Ancillary studies
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will assess the MRD rate with Haystack (positive circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid [+ctDNA] and negative imaging) versus MRD rate with Signatera (+ctDNA and negative imaging). Sensitivity (i.e., true positive rate - proportion of patients who recur that are found to be MRD positive), specificity (i.e., true negative rate - proportion of patients who do NOT recur that are found to be MRD negative), positive predictive value (i.e., proportion of positive tests which are true positives) and negative predictive value (proportion of negative tests which are true negatives) of the Haystack test and of the Signatera test for predicting disease recurrence will be calculated and summarized at various times of testing.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
The time interval between recurrence detection by the Haystack MRD test compared to radiological imaging assessment and Signatera test will be calculated as the time interval between the detection of disease recurrence by each of the methods (Haystack test, radiological imaging, Signatera test). Lead-time will be estimated by means of appropriate formulas and Monte Carlo simulation. Pairwise comparisons of detection times will be performed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards model will be used to estimate the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for each detection method.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Logistic regression model will be used to estimate the level of association of ctDNA result and the status of recurrence and non- recurrence in patients with resectable stage II-IV colorectal cancer. Multivariable models adjusting for relevant clinical variables will be evaluated to assess the importance of these prognostic factors and support the robustness of ctDNA findings.
City of Hope Medical Center
Other
ctDNA Testing in Resectable Stage II-IV Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Head-to-Head Performance Comparison
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04796818
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Neoplasms
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03823144
Adenocarcinoma, Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07612007
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Neoplasms
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05845450
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Milan, Lombardia/MI, Italy
View Trial Details