Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Terminated

NCT Number: NCT07102979

Remedial Mechanism of Simvastatin and Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Liver Cirrhosis: Crosstalk of Bile Secretion, Gut Microbiome, and Host Immune Response

This exploratory, randomized, open-label pilot study evaluated gut microbiota, fecal bile acid profiles, inflammatory markers, and fibrosis-related biomarkers in adults with chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis C after viral control. The study included a randomized cohort with advanced liver fibrosis and a non-randomized comparison cohort without advanced fibrosis. Viral control was defined as hepatitis B virus suppression during antiviral therapy or sustained virologic response after hepatitis C treatment.

The main questions addressed by the study were:

Do participants with advanced liver fibrosis differ from those without advanced fibrosis in their baseline gut microbiota, fecal bile acid profiles, inflammatory markers, or fibrosis-related biomarkers? What within-participant changes in these measures are observed after six months of treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), simvastatin, or combined UDCA plus simvastatin? What descriptive patterns of change are observed across the three active-treatment groups?

Advanced liver fibrosis was operationally defined during enrollment as a FibroScan liver stiffness measurement of ≥9.5 kPa. Thirteen participants with presumed advanced liver fibrosis were randomized to observation without study medication, UDCA alone, simvastatin alone, or combined simvastatin plus UDCA. One randomized participant was subsequently excluded from the analysis after eligibility review because the advanced-fibrosis criteria were not confirmed, leaving 12 eligible randomized participants, with three participants in each study group. An additional six participants with non-advanced fibrosis, defined by a FibroScan liver stiffness measurement of <6.0 kPa, were enrolled as a non-randomized baseline comparison group.

Baseline blood and stool samples were collected from all 19 enrolled participants. The final baseline analysis set included 18 eligible participants: 12 participants with advanced fibrosis and six participants without advanced fibrosis. Follow-up blood and stool samples were collected after six months from the nine participants in the three active-treatment groups. The observation group and the non-advanced fibrosis comparison group contributed baseline data only and did not undergo post-treatment sampling.

Recruitment was substantially slower than anticipated and was discontinued after the available study funding was exhausted. The study was therefore terminated before reaching its originally planned enrollment target. The final actual enrollment was 19 participants, of whom 18 were included in the final analysis set. Because only three participants were available in each randomized study group, all treatment-related analyses were considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating. The study was not designed or adequately powered to establish clinical efficacy, histological fibrosis regression, or superiority of combination therapy.

Why the study stopped: Slow recruitment and exhaustion of available study funding.
Terminated

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Kaohsiung City, Others, 833, Taiwan

About this study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with advanced liver fibrosis remain at risk of liver-related complications even after successful control of chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis C. Alterations in the gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism may contribute to persistent inflammation and fibrosis progression through the gut-liver axis.

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) modifies the bile acid pool and may influence bile acid metabolism and signaling. Simvastatin may have anti-inflammatory, endothelial, and antifibrotic effects. This exploratory pilot study evaluated gut microbiota, fecal bile acid profiles, inflammatory markers, and fibrosis-related biomarkers in adults with chronic viral hepatitis after viral control.

The study had two main objectives: first, to compare baseline biological characteristics between participants with and without advanced liver fibrosis; and second, to explore within-participant changes after six months of treatment with UDCA, simvastatin, or their combination.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, open-label exploratory pilot study.

Participants with presumed advanced liver fibrosis were assigned by block randomization, with a planned 1:1:1:1 allocation, to one of four groups:

Observation without study medication; UDCA 10 mg/kg/day for six months; Simvastatin 40 mg/day for six months; or Simvastatin 40 mg/day plus UDCA 10 mg/kg/day for six months.

A separate non-randomized cohort of participants without advanced fibrosis was enrolled for baseline comparison.

Eligible participants had chronic hepatitis B with viral suppression during antiviral therapy or chronic hepatitis C with sustained virologic response after antiviral treatment. During study enrollment, advanced liver fibrosis was operationally defined as a FibroScan liver stiffness measurement of at least 9.5 kPa. The non-advanced fibrosis comparison cohort was defined by a liver stiffness measurement of less than 6.0 kPa.

ACTUAL ENROLLMENT AND FOLLOW-UP

The study was originally planned to enroll 120 participants in the four randomized groups and an additional 30 participants in the non-randomized comparison cohort.

Recruitment began in January 2024. The study and recruitment period was subsequently extended through December 2025 with formal Institutional Review Board approval. Despite the approved extension, recruitment remained substantially slower than anticipated, and the available study funding was exhausted before the planned sample size could be reached. Recruitment was therefore discontinued, and the study was terminated early.

The final actual enrollment was 19 participants. Thirteen participants with presumed advanced fibrosis were randomized. One participant assigned to the UDCA group was subsequently excluded from the final analyses because the advanced-fibrosis eligibility criteria were not confirmed during post-randomization review. This participant remained included in the actual enrollment count.

The final analysis set therefore included 18 eligible participants: 12 participants with advanced fibrosis, with three participants in each randomized group, and six participants with non-advanced fibrosis in the non-randomized comparison cohort.

Baseline blood and stool samples were collected from all enrolled participants. Samples from the participant whose eligibility was not confirmed were excluded from the final analyses. Six-month follow-up samples were collected from the nine participants in the three active-treatment groups. The observation group and the non-advanced fibrosis comparison group contributed baseline data only.

STUDY ASSESSMENTS

Study assessments included clinical characteristics, stool microbiota profiles, targeted fecal bile acid measurements, inflammatory markers, and fibrosis-related biomarkers.

Microbiota assessments included measures of microbial diversity and taxonomic composition. Fecal bile acid assessments included selected primary, secondary, and conjugated bile acids. Changes from baseline to six months were evaluated in participants receiving active treatment.

Because of the small number of participants and the absence of longitudinal sampling in the observation and non-advanced fibrosis comparison groups, all treatment-related assessments were considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating. The study was not adequately powered to establish clinical efficacy, histological fibrosis regression, or superiority of one treatment regimen over another.

PROTOCOL NONCOMPLIANCE AND REGULATORY HANDLING

The operational liver-stiffness criterion applied during enrollment differed from the more restrictive fibrosis-related eligibility criteria specified in the original protocol and initial ClinicalTrials.gov record. Consequently, some participants included in the operationally defined advanced-fibrosis cohort did not meet the original fibrosis-related eligibility definition.

This protocol noncompliance was formally reported to the Institutional Review Board and was acknowledged on June 8, 2026 (IRB protocol no. 202201398A3; noncompliance report no. 202201398A3C2001). The Institutional Review Board subsequently accepted the study closure report on July 23, 2026.

The results of this prematurely terminated pilot study should therefore be interpreted as exploratory biological observations rather than confirmatory evidence of treatment efficacy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 75 years
  • Diagnosed with advanced fibrosis; the cohort was operationally defined by a FibroScan liver stiffness measurement of ≥9.5 kPa.
  • Achieved sustained virological response (SVR) at least 6 months after hepatitis C treatment, or
  • Non-replicating hepatitis B infection (undetectable viral load) for at least 6 months
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Current or prior use of statins
  • Liver decompensation (jaundice, ascites, hepatic coma, or esophagogastric varices)
  • Diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma or other liver cancers
  • Alcoholic liver disease or moderate-to-severe fatty liver
  • Diagnosed diabetes mellitus
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Use of antibiotics within the past 3 months
  • Use of gastric ulcer medications such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Any condition deemed by the investigator to interfere with study participation or outcomes

Treatment and study plan

Ursodeoxycholic Acid (URSO)

Drug

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was administered orally at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day for 6 months.

simvastatin

Drug

Simvastatin was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg/day for 6 months.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in liver fibrosis biomarker (TGF-β1)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment initiation

    Measurement of serum fibrosis-related marker TGF-β1. This will assess the antifibrotic effects of simvastatin, UDCA, and their combination in patients with stable liver cirrhosis.

  2. Change in liver fibrosis biomarker (Type IV collagen)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment initiation

    Measurement of serum fibrosis-related marker Type IV collagen. This will assess the antifibrotic effects of simvastatin, UDCA, and their combination in patients with stable liver cirrhosis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Cirrhosis Dysbiosis Ratio (CDR)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment

    CDR is calculated as the ratio of beneficial autochthonous bacteria (e.g., Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, Clostridiales) to potentially pathogenic bacteria (e.g., Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococcaceae), using 16S rRNA sequencing of stool samples.

  2. Change in Serum Inflammatory Cytokines

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment

    Measurement of circulating cytokines including IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 to evaluate systemic inflammatory response to intervention.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Remedial Mechanisms of Simvastatin and Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Liver Cirrhosis: Crosstalk Between Bile Secretion, Gut Microbiome, and Host Immune Response

Acronym: SURGIC-Liver

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 5, 2025
Registry last updated
Aug 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.