Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020, Austria
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07068776
The aim of this trial is to apply shockwaves to the leg wound after saphenous vein harvesting and closure in order to reduce the occurrence of postoperative wound healing complications following coronary artery bypass grafting using venous grafts.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020, Austria
Location status: Recruiting
Selection of suitable grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most critical decisions cardiac surgeons must make. There are two main techniques for harvesting graft vessels. The first is the skeletonized harvesting technique (ST), in which only the vessel itself is dissected and isolated before removal. The second method is the "no-touch" technique (NT), where the vessel is harvested along with surrounding tissue to minimize direct manipulation and potential microtrauma to the graft.
Saphenous vein grafts (SVG) are the most commonly used conduits in CABG and can be harvested using either technique. While the NT technique has demonstrated superior long-term patency and reduced atherosclerotic changes, it is associated with a significantly higher rate of wound healing complications, which are often more severe and can have a considerable impact on patient quality of life.
Shockwave therapy (SWT) has been shown to accelerate wound healing. The SHIELDS-CABG trial employs a double-blinded, sham-controlled design to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic SWT in reducing wound healing complications after NT saphenous vein harvesting in CABG patients. In this study, the intervention group receives SWT immediately after wound closure to enhance healing and prevent complications.
This is a prospective, single-center, single-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial conducted at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck. Blinding is maintained intraoperatively and only applied after wound closure to avoid procedural bias. Half of the patients will receive SWT, while in the control group the device will be held over the wound for the same duration without delivering shockwaves. A double-blind design is not feasible, as the operating staff can hear the characteristic sound of the device during SWT application.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The shockwave device will be set to an energy flux density of 0.1 mJ/mm² at 5 Hz, with approximately 25 impulses per centimeter of wound length. This means that one centimeter of the wound will be treated for 5 seconds. The shockwave treatment will then be carried out, with each centimeter of the wound area treated for 5 seconds using gentle circular motions.
The applicator will not be connected to the shockwave device. The applicator treatment will then be carried out, with each centimeter of the wound area treated for 5 seconds using gentle circular motions.
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
We defined the occurrence of a wound healing complication as followed:
Definition of Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
The SSI definition is in accordance with the guidelines of the center for disease control and their recommendations for superficial incisional SSI:
Time frame: From randomization to the end of participation at 180 days
Difference in the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) score. The BWAT is a validated instrument used to assess wound healing, consisting of 13 scored items related to wound size, depth, edges, undermining, necrotic tissue, exudate, skin color, peripheral tissue, granulation, and epithelialization. Each item is scored from 1 (best) to 5 (worst). The total score ranges from 13 (completely healed wound) to 65 (most severe wound condition). Higher scores indicate worse wound status.
Time frame: From randomization to end of study participation at 180 days
Difference in the EQ-5D-5L index score, a standardized measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol Group. The EQ-5D-5L index score ranges from -0.594 to 1.000, where higher scores indicate better health status. A score of 1 represents full health, 0 represents a health state equivalent to death, and negative values represent health states considered worse than death.
Time frame: From randomization to end of study participation at 180 days
Number of unscheduled outpatient visits
Time frame: From randomization to end of study participation at 180 days
Rate of surgical revisions due to wound healing complications, except for bleeding
Time frame: From randomization to end of study participation at 180 days
Proportion of patients requiring antibiotics due to wound healing complications
Time frame: From randomization to discharge (Day 8±3)
Wound status at discharge Difference in the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) score. The BWAT is a validated instrument used to assess wound healing, consisting of 13 scored items related to wound size, depth, edges, undermining, necrotic tissue, exudate, skin color, peripheral tissue, granulation, and epithelialization. Each item is scored from 1 (best) to 5 (worst). The total score ranges from 13 (completely healed wound) to 65 (most severe wound condition). Higher scores indicate worse wound status.
Time frame: From randomization to end of study participation at 180 days
Difference in laboratory values:
Time frame: From randomization to end of study participation at 180 days
Device related adverse events A clinical trial adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in a patient or clinical trial subject C or not related to the investigational medical device. This includes events related or not to a comparator and procedures involved.
Surgical procedures themselves are not AEs; they are therapeutic measures for conditions that require surgery. The condition for which the surgery is required may be an AE. Planned surgical measures permitted by the clinical trial protocol and the condition(s) leading to these measures are not AEs, if the condition leading to the measure was present prior to inclusion into the trial.
Time frame: From randomization to end of study participation at 180 days
Device related Serious Adverse Events
Interested in participating?
Request InfoMedical University Innsbruck
Other
Shockwave Intervention for Enhanced Wound Healing in No-touch Pedicle Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Study
Acronym: SHIELDS-CABG
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07777341
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06959524
Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), de Novo Lesions in Native Coronary Arteries
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07444931
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Hadera, Israel
View Trial DetailsNCT06804499
Acute Coronary Event, Acute Coronary Syndrome
Tampere, Pirkanmaa, Finland
View Trial Details