Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Cairo, 11559, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06990945
a two-year, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of a bioactive glass adhesive (Hi-Bond Universal) versus a conventional adhesive (OptiBond Universal) in Class II carious lesions. The study will assess clinical outcomes such as fracture resistance and marginal adaptation and radiographic evidence of dentin remineralization in 80 adult participants. Hypersensitivity and secondary caries development will also be monitored at multiple time points to determine comparative efficacy.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified22 year–42 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, 11559, Egypt
This study is a two-year, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to compare the clinical performance and radiographic outcomes of a mesoporous bioactive glass adhesive (Hi-Bond Universal) with a conventional universal adhesive (OptiBond Universal) in Class II carious lesions. The trial will enroll 80 participants aged 22 to 42 years, recruited from the Outpatient Clinic of the Conservative Dentistry Department at Cairo University.
Eligible participants presenting with ICDAS 5 and 6 carious lesions in posterior permanent teeth will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The intervention group will receive the Hi-Bond Universal adhesive, a bioactive glass-modified adhesive intended to promote dentin remineralization and reduce postoperative hypersensitivity through calcium and phosphate ion release. The control group will be treated with OptiBond Universal, a conventional adhesive providing mechanical bonding without bioactive properties.
Clinical outcomes will be evaluated using the FDI World Dental Federation criteria, focusing on functional properties such as fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, and retention. Radiographic assessments will quantify dentin remineralization using digital grayscale analysis. Hypersensitivity will be recorded using a patient-reported Likert scale at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
The primary outcome is the functional integrity of the restorative material, assessed at 24 months. Secondary outcomes include the presence of marginal caries, postoperative hypersensitivity, and radiographic evidence of dentin remineralization. Data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods to determine differences between the two adhesive systems.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Presence of Class II carious lesions in posterior permanent teeth (ICDAS 5 & 6).
Radiographic evidence of caries extending to 50% of dentin with a radiopaque layer between the lesion and pulp chamber.
Teeth with normal pulp vitality confirmed through cold pulp sensibility test.
Teeth with no periapical pathosis on radiographic examination.
Good oral hygiene as determined by the attending clinician.
Willingness to sign the informed consent and comply with the 2-year follow-up protocol.
Cooperative patients who can attend all follow-up visits.
Exclusion criteria
Patients currently undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
Pregnant women or those planning pregnancy during the study period.
Patients with systemic diseases that could interfere with dental treatment (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, cardiovascular diseases).
Use of analgesics or medications that could mask postoperative sensitivity.
Teeth with previous restorations or treatment in the target area.
Teeth exhibiting spontaneous pain or lingering pain after sensitivity testing, indicating irreversible pulpitis.
Negative response in cold pulp sensibility test, indicating pulp necrosis.
Teeth with periapical radiolucencies or signs of infection.
Mobile teeth due to periodontal disease or trauma.
Teeth with extensive structural damage, such as cusp fractures or deep cracks.
Patients unable to comply with the follow-up schedule.
A bioactive glass adhesive containing mesoporous bioactive glass designed to promote dentin remineralization, manufactured by Mediclus, Korea. It releases calcium and phosphate ions to enhance dentin sealing and reduce hypersensitivity
The adhesive will be applied after selective caries removal following a standardized protocol:
Selective enamel etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds.
Application of HI Bond Universal adhesive with agitation for 20 seconds.
Light curing for 20 seconds using a LED curing device.
Incremental application of a nano-hybrid composite (Optishade Universal Kerr Dental, USA).
Occlusal adjustment, finishing, and polishing.
conventional universal adhesive designed for bonding composite restorations to enamel and dentin.
The adhesive will be applied after selective caries removal following a standardized protocol:
Selective enamel etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds.
Application of OptiBond Universal adhesive with agitation for 20 seconds.
Light curing for 20 seconds using a LED curing device.
Incremental application of a nano-hybrid composite (Optishade Universal Kerr Dental, USA).
Occlusal adjustment, finishing, and polishing.
Time frame: 24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
The clinical performance of the adhesive systems will be assessed based on the functional properties, specifically focusing on the retention of the composite Restoration Clinical assessment of the condition of adjacent mucosa to detect signs of irritation or inflammation caused by the adhesive materials.
Assessment Method: FDI Criteria Scores (1-5)
Time frame: 24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Assessment of fracture resistance of the restorative materials (Hi-Bond Universal vs. OptiBond Universal) using the FDI Criteria. This includes the evaluation of material integrity, chipping, fractures, and overall structural durability of the restorations.Clinical assessment of the condition of adjacent mucosa to detect signs of irritation or inflammation caused by the adhesive materials.
Assessment Method: FDI Criteria Scores (1-5)
Time frame: 24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Assessment of contact points and contours of the restoration, focusing on anatomical integrity and function.
Assessment Method: FDI Criteria Scores (1-5)
Time frame: 24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Evaluation of the marginal adaptation of the adhesive systems using clinical criteria. This outcome assesses the adhesive's ability to seal restoration margins effectively.Clinical assessment of the condition of adjacent mucosa to detect signs of irritation or inflammation caused by the adhesive materials.
Assessment Method: FDI Criteria Scores (1-5)
Time frame: 24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
The presence of caries at restoration margins will be assessed using clinical examinations. The objective is to evaluate the adhesive's ability to prevent secondary caries development at the margins of the restorations.Clinical assessment of the condition of adjacent mucosa to detect signs of irritation or inflammation caused by the adhesive materials.
Assessment Method: FDI Criteria Scores (1-5)
Time frame: 24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Assessment of patient-reported tooth hypersensitivity following adhesive application and composite restoration.Clinical assessment of the condition of adjacent mucosa to detect signs of irritation or inflammation caused by the adhesive materials.
Assessment Method: FDI Criteria Scores (1-5)
Time frame: 24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Clinical assessment of the condition of adjacent mucosa to detect signs of irritation or inflammation caused by the adhesive materials.
Assessment Method: FDI Criteria Scores (1-5)
Time frame: 24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Clinical evaluation of staining at the surface and margins of the restoration to assess esthetic integrity.
Assessment Method: FDI Criteria Scores (1-5)
Time frame: 24 months (Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Evaluation of remineralization at the remaining dentin bridge using digital radiography and grayscale analysis.
Assessment Method: Digital Radiography (Grayscale values 0-255)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ahmed Hesham Samaha, PhD candidate Conservative Dep
CONTACT
(+2) 01007484138
Prof. Dr. Rasha Raafat Main Supervisor / Data Monitoring, professor conservative depar.
CONTACT
Cairo University
Other
Clinical Performance And Radiographic Assessment Of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Adhesive Vs. Universal Adhesive In Class II Carious Lesions
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00894816
Allergy, Asthma
Umeå, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT01268605
Dental Caries, Hypersensitivity
Phoeniz, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07765654
Behavior, Dental Caries
View Trial DetailsNCT07751016
Dental Caries, Stomatognathic Diseases
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial Details