Medipol University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06849726
Childbirth is an intense physical and psychological experience. Epidural analgesia (EP) remains the gold standard in labor pain management. However, continuous refinements are aimed at enhancing analgesic quality and mitigating adverse effects. In recent years, the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique has gained popularity. In this technique, the dura is intentionally punctured with a spinal needle before the epidural catheter is placed, but no intrathecal medication is administered. This historically controlled study evaluates the clinical outcomes of a protocol transition from standard high-dose epidural to low-dose DPE. The primary objective is to compare total analgesic consumption and success rates of labor analgesia between the two techniques. The secondary objectives include the assessment of hemodynamic parameters, motor block characteristics, adverse effects (such as paresthesia and hypotension), and overall maternal satisfaction
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–40 year
Female
Observational
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
The maternal pain experience encompasses psychological and emotional components, highlighting the necessity for patient-centered assessment approaches. While standard epidural and combined spinal-epidural (CSE) techniques are common, they carry risks such as inadequate sacral coverage, motor block, or fetal bradycardia. The dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique aims to combine the advantages of EP and CSE while minimizing their disadvantages. By creating a dural hole, DPE facilitates the translocation of epidural medications into the subarachnoid space, aiming to accelerate the onset of analgesia and improve block quality.This single-center, historically controlled study consists of two consecutive cohorts managed before and after a change in the clinical protocol. Group 1 (retrospective control) received standard concentration epidural analgesia. Group 2 (prospective intervention) received the low-dose DPE technique. The study hypothesizes that the low-dose DPE technique provides non-inferior analgesic efficacy with significantly reduced total bupivacaine consumption and a superior side-effect profile compared to the standard high-dose EP technique. Outcomes evaluated include total bupivacaine consumption, adequate analgesia success (NRS < 4), maternal hemodynamic changes, incidence of adverse effects including paresthesia, and patient satisfaction. Note on outcome reporting: serial intrapartum measurements of maternal blood pressure, maternal heart rate and fetal heart rate were not documented on the routine anesthesia monitoring forms used during the retrospective control period. The registered secondary outcome of maternal hemodynamic and fetal heart rate variation could therefore not be compared between the two cohorts. Baseline values recorded before the procedure were available for all 100 participants and are reported as baseline characteristics, together with the incidence of hypotension and of fetal bradycardia. No registered outcome has been removed from this record.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Administration of conventional epidural analgesia using an 18G Tuohy needle for catheter placement and subsequent administration of a standardized dose of bupivacaine with fentanyl.
Administration of epidural analgesia that incorporates a dural puncture with a 27G spinal needle prior to epidural catheter placement, followed by administration of a lower concentration of bupivacaine with the same dose of fentanyl.
Time frame: From the initiation of epidural analgesia until delivery.
Cumulative bupivacaine consumption measured in milligrams.
Time frame: Assessed at 15 minutes post-procedure and during hourly follow-ups until delivery.
Proportion of participants achieving a target Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score of less than 4
Time frame: Continuously monitored from the initial epidural dose until delivery.
Recording of adverse effects including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, hypotension, and paresthesia
Time frame: From the initiation of epidural analgesia until delivery.
Total number of supplemental boluses required during labor
Time frame: Assessed in the early postpartum period.
Documented patient satisfaction levels regarding the childbirth experience
Time frame: Up to 1 week postpartum.
Incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache in the postpartum period.
Time frame: Monitored throughout the procedure until delivery.
Occurrence and degree of motor block, evaluated by the Modified Bromage Scale.
Time frame: Continuously monitored throughout the procedure.
Variation in maternal blood pressure, heart rate, and fetal heart rate changes.
Medipol University
Other
Comparison of Standard Epidural and Dural Puncture Epidural Techniques in Labor Analgesia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07145775
Dexmedetomidine, Epidural Analgesia
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03389945
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
View Trial DetailsNCT07267351
Childbirth, Labor Pain
Nicosia, Cyprus
View Trial DetailsNCT07669441
Epidural Analgesia for Labour and Delivery, Labor Pain
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
View Trial Details