Northeastern University
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
NCT Number: NCT06645652
The present study investigates the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a novel visual arts-based intervention in an older adult population. In a randomized controlled design, two arts-based interventions will be evaluated with a group of 40 participants.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me55 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
A two-arm randomized controlled study will be conducted to obtain within-group ratings of feasibility and acceptability, as well as between-group differences in drawing skills after training. In the drawing intervention, participants will learn and train drawing skills through exercises that target attention, perception, and visuospatial reasoning. In the active control condition, participants will navigate virtual art galleries. Both interventions will be completed remotely and at home. Participants will complete in-lab assessment sessions before and after the training.
Each intervention consists of 6 weeks of training for up to 2 hours a week, including up to 1 hour of a self-guided lesson and prompted daily drawing practice adding up to 1 hour in the drawing intervention and 2 1-hour sessions of virtual gallery exploring per week in the arts appreciation intervention. The pre-test is administered within one week of the start of training and the post-test is administered within one week of training completion.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Throughout training (weeks 1-6 of training)
Perceived age-appropriateness of the course content, likert scale 0-5
Time frame: Throughout training (weeks 1-6 of training)
Level of engagement with the course materials, likert scale 0-5
Time frame: Throughout training (weeks 1-6 of training)
How welcoming participants perceived the activities, likert scale from 0-5
Time frame: At the post-test 6-8 weeks later
% of participants who completed both testing sessions
Time frame: At the post-test 6-8 weeks later or when a participant decided to drop out
Number of lessons that participants completed, from 0-6
Time frame: Throughout training (weeks 1-6 of training)
Total number of times participants logged their progress
Time frame: At the post-test 6-8 weeks later or when a participant decided to drop out
List of common reasons for drop-out and the number of times a reason was mentioned
Time frame: Pre-test (baseline) and post-test 6-8 weeks later
Participants will have 7 minutes to draw a still life from observation. Accuracy is scored using a rubric assessing accuracy on global and local features.
Time frame: Pre-test (baseline) and post-test 6-8 weeks later
Participants tap on circles of aligned Gabors embedded in a scene of randomly oriented Gabors. A circle will be present for 3 seconds and switch to the next trial if it is not seen. Orientation jitter threshold will be measured.
Time frame: Pre-test (baseline) and post-test 6-8 weeks later
articipants search for a target shape in 3 complex gestalts of overlapping shapes. Participants select the complex shape containing the target. Number of correctly answered trials accuracy are measured.
Time frame: Pre-test (baseline) and post-test 6-8 weeks later
3D Mental Rotation (3 min) will test mental transformation. Participants will be briefly shown two figures and asked to determine whether the figures are the same or mirror reversed. Number of correctly answered trials accuracy are measured.
Time frame: Pre-test (baseline) and post-test 6-8 weeks later
3D Mental Rotation (3 min) will test mental transformation. Participants will be briefly shown two figures and asked to determine whether the figures are the same or mirror reversed. Number of correctly answered trials accuracy are measured.
Time frame: Pre-test (baseline) and post-test 6-8 weeks later
A cancellation task will measure selective attention. Participants correctly mark as many d's with two marks as they can in a set amount of time. A score of concentration performance is extracted by subtracting the sum of false alarms from the sum of hits.
Time frame: Pre-test (baseline) and post-test 6-8 weeks later
Participants complete a version Solloway Mindfulness Survey adapted to drawing. The questionnaire includes 30 questions on a 7-point scale on the degree to which engaging in drawing is related to different aspects of mindful attention.
Time frame: Pre-test (baseline) and post-test 6-8 weeks later
Mental Wellbeing is assessed by the WEMWBS, which includes 14 questions on a 5 point scale about positive mental wellbeing.
Time frame: After every training session (weeks 1-6 of training, up to 7 times a week)
Participants select how much flow they felt during a given session using a set of 18 questions and a scale from 1-5
Northeastern University
Other
Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of a Drawing-based Intervention on Cognition and Wellbeing of Community-Dwelling Adults at Risk for ADRD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07723885
Acceptability, Feasibility Study
Narayanganj, Dhaka Division, Bangladesh
View Trial DetailsNCT07762807
Colchicine, Feasibility Study
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06918509
Acceptability Study, Feasibility Study
Waliso, Ethiopia
View Trial DetailsNCT07529548
Acceptability, Appropriateness
Tempe, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details