Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo collection of blood and/or plasma
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT06568172
This phase III trial compares the effect of adding cemiplimab to standard therapy (surgery with or without radiation) versus standard therapy alone in treating patients with stage III/IV squamous cell skin cancer that is able to be removed by surgery (resectable) and that may have come back after a period of improvement (recurrent). The usual treatment for patients with resectable squamous cell skin cancer is the removal of the cancerous tissue (surgery) with or without radiation, which uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as cemiplimab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Cemiplimab has been approved for the treatment of skin cancer that has spread or that cannot be removed by surgery, but it has not been approved for the treatment of skin cancer than can be removed by surgery. Adding cemiplimab to the usual treatment of surgery with or without radiation may be more effective in treating patients with stage III/IV resectable squamous cell skin cancer than the usual treatment alone.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine if neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with response-adapted oncologic surgery improves site-reported event-free survival (EFS) compared to standard-of-care surgery in resectable stage III/IV cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare utilization of adjuvant radiation between arms. II. To compare disease-free survival (DFS) between arms. III. To compare overall survival (OS) between arms. IV. To compare adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version [v]5.0) between arms.
V. To assess pathologic complete response in arm 2.
PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES:
I. Compare changes in patient reported quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery between treatment arms. (Primary objective) II. To compare patient reported symptoms functioning, and quality of life, as measured by the Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma NeoAdjuvant, Adjuvant and Perioperative 32 question scale (CSCC NAAP-32), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Short Form (SF)-Anxiety, PROMIS-SF-Fatigue, and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), between arms at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery.
III. Develop a scoring algorithm and validate the CSCC-NAAP-32 for use in this patient population.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare disease-specific survival (DSS) between arms. II. To correlate pathologic response with DFS in arm 2. III. To assess overall response rate (ORR) in arm 2. IV. To compare patterns of failure between arms. V. To compare pathologic measurements of lymph node yield between arms. VI. To compare primary tumor specimen dimensions and volume between arms.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM 1: Patients undergo surgery per standard of care within 6 weeks of randomization. Starting within 6-12 weeks of surgery, patients may undergo image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for 5 fractions per week for 6 weeks as clinically indicated. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and/or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT prior to treatment, and CT and/or MRI during follow up. Patients may also undergo optional collection of tissue, whole blood, and plasma on study.
ARM 2: Patients receive cemiplimab intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then undergo response-adaptive surgery 21 days after last dose of cemiplimab. Starting within 12 weeks of surgery, patients may undergo IGRT with IMRT for 5 fractions per week for 6 weeks as clinically indicated. Starting within 6 weeks of completion of surgery or radiation therapy (if indicated), patients without pathologic complete response (pCR) receive cemiplimab IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 42 days for up to 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT, MRI, and/or PET/CT prior to treatment, and CT and/or MRI on study and during follow up. Patients may also undergo optional collection of tissue, whole blood, and plasma on study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1, 6, and 12 months post-surgery then every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months in year 3, and then annually thereafter.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Undergo collection of blood and/or plasma
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
Given IV
Other names: Cemiplimab RWLC, Cemiplimab-rwlc, Libtayo, REGN 2810, REGN-2810, REGN2810
Undergo CT and/or PET/CT
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type, tomography
Undergo IGRT
Other names: IGRT, Image Guided Radiotherapy, image-guided radiation therapy, Image-Guided Radiotherapy
Undergo IMRT
Other names: IMRT, Intensity modulated radiation therapy (procedure), Intensity Modulated RT, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Radiation, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Undergo PET/CT
Other names: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron emission tomography (procedure), Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, PT
Ancillary studies
Undergo surgery per SOC
Other names: Operation, Surgery, Surgery Type, Surgery, NOS, Surgical, Surgical Intervention, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Procedures, Type of Surgery
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Defined as the time from randomization to any of the following events: progression of disease that precludes surgery, toxic effects related to treatment that preclude surgery, inability to resect all gross disease), disease recurrence (local, regional, or distant) after surgery (or after radiographic complete response), disease progression after radiographic partial response or stable disease without surgery (or biopsy, as applicable), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. EFS rates will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the stratified log-rank test will be used to assess whether perioperative immunotherapy (neoadjuvant/adjuvant) with response-adapted oncologic surgery improves EFS as recorded by the site compared to standard-of-care surgery in resectable stage III/IV cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Rates of utilization of adjuvant radiation for each arm will be computed using a binomial distribution assumption. A 95% confidence interval (CI) for the rate difference between arms will be calculated using the stratified Newcombe (Wilson) method (Yan 2010).
Time frame: From randomization to recurrent or death, assessed up to 6 years
DFS will use the same analytic methods as EFS.
Time frame: From randomization to death, assessed up to 6 years
OS will use the same analytic methods as EFS.
Time frame: At 30 days and then up to 6 years
Adverse events (AEs) will be graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version (v) 5.0. Counts and frequencies of all AEs by grade will be provided by each treatment arm. For the experimental arm, AEs will be summarized for each treatment phase (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and post-treatment [after adjuvant]). Counts and frequencies will be provided for the worst grade AE experienced by the patient by treatment arm. The proportion of patients with at least one grade 3 or higher AE, serious AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation or death will be reported for each treatment arm. These analyses will be descriptive.
Time frame: At 1 and 2 years
Site-reported pathologic response will be assessed using the following categories: pathological complete, major, and partial response, no pathological response (i.e., no complete, major, or partial response), and no pathological evaluation. Pathological responses at 1 and 2 years will be summarized using frequencies and percentages and tested using a chi-square test at a two-sided 5% significance level.
Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months after surgery
The primary patient-reported outcome (PRO) is the global health status score as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30. For all PRO scheduled assessment visits, patient disposition will be summarized. PRO completion rate and available data rate will be computed and reported at each timepoint. Mixed effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) will be performed for the global health status score incorporating all PRO assessment timepoints. The adjusted means for each treatment and the estimated treatment differences for the treatment comparisons will be presented together with 95% CIs.
Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months after surgery
Item response distributions, inter-item correlations, factor analysis and internal consistency will be assessed. Confirmatory factor analyses will be used to confirm the underlying structure hypothesized by the conceptual framework. Items capturing perceptions and effect of treatments will be evaluated with single-item scores. Completion rate and available data rate will be computed and reported at each timepoint. CSCC-NAAP-32 item responses will be described at baseline to evaluate floor/ceiling effects, missingness, outliers, and multi-modal distributions. Internal consistency reliability for multi-item scales will be evaluated at baseline using both Cronbach's alpha and McDonald Omega coefficients. Test-retest reliability will be assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients between two time points. Construct validity and ability to detect change over time will be assessed.
Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months after surgery
PRO instruments will be scored based on their respective scoring algorithms. Descriptive statistics, MMRMs, and assessment of missing data will be performed.
Time frame: From randomization to death due to study cancer, date of precluding event, or last follow up, assessed up to 6 years
The cause-specific log-rank test and cause-specific Cox models will also be used to compare cause-specific HRs between treatment arms and estimate cause-specific treatment-effect HRs, respectively. The cumulative incidence method will be used to estimate the incidence of cancer-specific mortality with between-arm differences tested using the stratified Gray's test. Stratified sub-distribution HR and 95% CI for treatment effect from Fine-Gray models will be computed to supplement the DSS analysis.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Will evaluate the association of pathologic response with DFS in the experimental arm. Will compare EFS between patients with complete response versus others (major/partial/no response/not evaluable) using a log-rank test. DFS rates for each pathological response subgroup will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Furthermore, DFS rates for each pathological response subgroup will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method as an exploratory analysis.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Will be assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v. 1.1 and summarized by time-point using frequencies and relative frequencies. The best objective response (complete response + partial response) rate will be estimated using a 95% confidence interval obtained using the normal approximation for a binomial proportion.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Failure patterns (local, regional, and distant metastasis) for EFS will be summarized for each treatment arm.
Time frame: At time of surgery
The pathologic measurements of lymph node yield (i.e., number of lymph nodes) will be compared between arms using the Mann-Whitney test.
Time frame: At time of surgery
The pathologic measurements of the primary tumor specimens' length, width, and volume will be compared between arms using the t-test for independent samples. A Mann-Whitney test will be used if the distribution of a variable does not pass the normality test.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Treatment effect HR estimates and 95% CIs for the primary and secondary endpoints (EFS, DFS, DSS, OS) will be calculated using a (cause-specific) Cox model with treatment by factor interaction for the following subgroups:
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% CIs by sex will be provided.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% CIs by race will be provided.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% CIs by ethnicity will be provided.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
Randomized Phase III Trial of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy With Response-Adapted Treatment Versus Standard-of-Care Treatment for Resectable Stage III/IV Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (C-PRE)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04576091
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05269381
Adenocarcinoma, Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07156227
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06992427
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details