Vancouver Prostate Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06537154
Invasive bladder cancer is managed with neoadjuvant therapy followed by bladder removal (cystectomy). Research shows that approximately 40% of patient will have no remaining cancer left in their bladder after completion of the initial systemic treatment, and perhaps could have avoided the surgery. However, currently physicians lack the ability to identify these patients.
The investigators believe that by using advanced imaging (MRI), bladder biopsies and novel biomarkers that detect tumor DNA in blood, they can better identify participants without any remaining cancer after chemotherapy. This will make active surveillance of these participants safer. In this study, participants without evidence of residual cancer will be randomized to active surveillance vs conventional bladder treatment (bladder removal, or chemo-radiation of the bladder). This study will be a pilot randomized control trial (RCT), and if successful, it will transition to a larger phase 3 RCT.
Interested in participating?
Request Info19 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
Purpose To assess the feasibility to randomize patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who experience a complete clinical response (cCR) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), as defined by negative ctDNA, negative bladder MRI and negative repeat TURBT to active surveillance vs standard of care (SOC) with definitive bladder treatment.
Hypothesis The hypothesize is that the combination of bladder re-staging with MRI, repeat biopsy and the use of ctDNA will markedly enhance the ability to identified participant who achieve an excellent response to NAT (cCR) and who could safely be offered AS.
Justification:
Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by radical cystectomy (RC), or alternatively in selected patient, a combination of chemo-radiation (trimodal therapy, TMT), are the current standards of care for treatment of MIBC. However, both have significant potential toxicity that can impact quality of life. Clinical trials have demonstrated that up to 38% of patients have a pathologic complete response (pCR) to NAT. Those patients could potentially avoid RC or TMT. Unfortunately, the clinical tools to predict pCR are still considered inadequate and definitive local therapy is advised. Retrospective data and now prospective phase 2 trials have reported promising outcomes in selected patients undergoing active surveillance. A prospective randomized trial is still lacking to ensure non-inferiority of active surveillance over the standard of care.
Primary Objectives:
Research design:
Multi-center, phase II/III, open label randomized clinical trial
After enrolment, participants will received SOC NAT. Blood and urine specimens will be collected before or at cycle 1 day 1 of NAT. Participants will undergo conventional restaging during NAT, recommended to be done at the end of cycle 2. Conventional imaging consists of computerized tomography (CT) scan of chest/abdomen/pelvis to rule-out local or distant progression on treatment. Participants who have successfully completed the full regimen of SOC NAT, and have not been found to have progression and/or metastasis on their SOC CT scan, will then undergo the following intervention for the "clinical restaging" (CRS) (must be completed within 4 weeks after last dose of NAT):
Definition of clinical complete response (cCR):
Participants with cCR will then be randomized to either active surveillance or definitive bladder treatment (DBT) (RC or TMT, according to patient/physician choice). Participants who do not meet all criteria of cCR will proceed with SOC and have RC or TMT under the treating investigator's care.
Participants will adhere to the following schedule of surveillance:
Cystoscopy with urine cytology (for those with preserved bladder) every 3 months for 2 years. After 2 years, follow up schedule is at the discretion of the treating physician.
Repeat chest-abdomen-pelvis imaging with CT/MRI and ctDNA at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. After 2 years, follow up schedule is at the discretion of the treating physician.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participant found to have a cCR will be randomized to either standard of care or investigational active surveillance.
Other names: Clinical restaging (utDNA, ctDNA, MRI and TURBT)
Standard of care, consisting of radical cystectomy or chemo-radiation of the bladder
Time frame: 24 months
Feasibility to randomized patients with cCR to either active surveillance or definitive bladder treatment.
Time frame: 24 months
Time to metastasis, defined as >cN1 (more than 1 clinically suspicious lymph nodes), cT4a (unresectable disease), or M1 disease or death.
Time frame: 24 months
Time from study entry to the earliest of histologically proven presence of MIBC (≥T2), clinical evidence of nodal or metastatic disease, radical cystectomy, or death due to any cause.
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of ypT0 (pathologic complete response) on cystectomy specimen following NAT in participants who had a cystectomy after identification of cCR.
Time frame: 24 months
Time from study entry to death; individuals who are alive at last contact will be censored on the date of last contact.
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of concordance between treatment allocated and treatment received within the first 3 months following randomization.
Time frame: 24 months
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLG Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher (better) response level and quality of life.
Time frame: 24 months
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Module 30 (EORTC QLQ BLM-30). All of the Multi-item scales and Single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score for all of the Multi-item scales excluding Sexual functioning, and for the Single item, represents a high level of symptomatology or problems (worse outcome), whereas a high score for the Sexual functioning scale represents a high level of functioning (better outcome).
Interested in participating?
Request InfoPeter Black
Other
Active Surveillance Versus Definitive Local Therapy for Patients Showing Clinical Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Acronym: NEO-BLAST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06529822
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05334069
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06470282
Bladder Cancer, Female Urogenital Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07234968
Bladder Cancer, Bladder Neoplasm
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details