Azacitidine
DrugGiven IV or SC
Other names: 5 AZC, 5-AC, 5-Azacitidine, 5-Azacytidine, 5-AZC, Azacytidine, Azacytidine, 5-, Ladakamycin, Mylosar, U-18496, Vidaza
NCT Number: NCT06514261
This phase I trial tests safety, side effects and best dose of iadademstat with azacitidine and venetoclax for the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have not received treatment (treatment naive). Chemotherapy drugs, such as iadademstat and azacitidine work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Giving iadademstat with azacitidine and venetoclax may be safe and tolerable in treating patients with treatment naive AML.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
UCI Health - Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Ambulatory Care, Irvine, California, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and safety profile of iadademstat in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To observe and record anti-tumor activity, including evaluating the overall response rate (ORR), defined as complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (Cri), or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh).
II. To evaluate the measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative composite CR (cCR) rate after 1, 2, and 3 cycles using multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and evaluate event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DoR).
III. To determine if treatment will be associated with expansion of high risk molecular (PTPN11, NRAS, KRAS, NF1, and TP53) and cytogenetic (complex karyotype) markers over time.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the rate of MRD-negative cCR across molecular (PTPN11, NRAS, KRAS, NF1, and TP53) and cytogenetic (complex karyotype) subgroups.
II. To document the effect of therapy on LSD1-target engagement.
III. To determine if secondary resistance (remission with therapy then relapse) in both arms is associated with:
IIIa. Acquisition of resistance mutations including BCL-2 and BAX; IIIb. Development or expansion of mutations that activate RAS/MAPK/FLT3 including NRAS, KRAS, PTPN11, NF1, and FLT3-ITD; IIIc. Over-expression of resistance proteins such as MCL-1 or BCL-XL. IV. To determine pharmacokinetics (PK) in the triplet therapy of iadademstat, azacitidine, and venetoclax.
V. To explore PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship of iadademstat and venetoclax in patients who received the triplet therapy of iadademstat, azacitidine, and venetoclax.
VI. To evaluate the association between time to achieve an MRD-negative cCR and EFS, OS, and DoR.
OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study of iadademstat and venetoclax in combination with azacitidine.
INDUCTION: Patients receive iadademstat orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-5, 8-12, and may also receive it on days 15-19 of each cycle, venetoclax PO QD on days 1-14 or 1-21 of each cycle, and azacitidine intravenously (IV) over 10-40 minutes or subcutaneously (SC) on days 1-7 of each cycle or days 1-5 and 8-9 after cycle 1. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 3 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may also undergo buccal swab collection on study.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive iadademstat PO QD on days 1-5, 8-12 and may also receive it on days 15-19 of each cycle, venetoclax PO QD on days 1-7 or 1-14 of each cycle, and azacitidine IV over 10-40 minutes or SC on days 1-7 of each cycle or days 1-5 and 8-9 after cycle 1. Cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood sample collection and may undergo bone marrow aspiration throughout the study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3-4 months for up to 2 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given IV or SC
Other names: 5 AZC, 5-AC, 5-Azacitidine, 5-Azacytidine, 5-AZC, Azacytidine, Azacytidine, 5-, Ladakamycin, Mylosar, U-18496, Vidaza
Undergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
Undergo bone marrow aspiration
Undergo buccal swab
Other names: Buccal Scraping, Buccal Smear, Buccal swab/scraping, Buccal Swabbing
Given PO
Other names: ORY 1001, ORY-1001, RG 6016, RG6016, RO 7051790, RO7051790, trans-N1-((1R,2S)-2-Phenylcyclopropyl)-1,4-cyclohexanediamine
Given PO
Other names: ABT 199, ABT-0199, ABT-199, ABT199, GDC 0199, GDC-0199, GDC0199, RG7601, Venclexta, Venclyxto
Time frame: Up to completion of cycle 1
DLT will be defined as any of the following adverse events (AEs) that cannot be considered primarily related to the underlying acute myeloid leukemia or a comorbid condition and evaluated during the first cycle of treatment. Will utilize National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0 for toxicity grading and reporting.
Time frame: Up to completion of therapy
Will utilize NCI-CTCAE v5.0 for AE grading and reporting.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
The probability of achieving a complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), will be estimated with exact 95% binomial confidence intervals.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Time frame: After completion of 2 cycles
Will be estimated with exact 95% binomial confidence intervals.
Time frame: From study enrollment to disease progression, treatment failure (failure to achieve CR or < 5% bone marrow blasts) confirmed relapse or death, up to 4 years
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, along with 95% confidence regions.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, along with 95% confidence regions.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, along with 95% confidence regions.
Time frame: At baseline, during treatment, and at progression of disease, up to 4 years
Will be estimated with exact 95% binomial confidence intervals and compared between baseline, during treatment, and at progression of disease.
Time frame: After cycles 1, 3 and 6
Rates of MRD-negative cCR will be tabulated descriptively across molecular (PTPN11, NRAS, KRAS, NF1, and TP53) and cytogenetic (complex karyotype) subgroups. Will be estimated with exact 95% binomial confidence intervals.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Changes in %LSD1 target engagement will be compared between patients and between dose levels to confirm target engagement. Data between dose levels will be compared with a rank sum test and within patients with a signed rank test and/or mixed effects regression.
Time frame: At baseline, during treatment, and at progression of disease, up to 4 years
Time frame: At baseline, during treatment, and at progression of disease, up to 4 years
Time frame: At baseline and at progression of disease, up to 4 years
Time frame: At baseline, during treatment, and at progression of disease, up to 4 years
Time frame: Day 5, 8 and 12
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Time frame: From study enrollment to disease progression, treatment failure (failure to achieve CR or < 5% bone marrow blasts) confirmed relapse or death, up to 4 years
Kaplan Meier methods will be used to estimate the median survivals (with a 90% confidence interval) as a function of time to response. The effects of time to response will also be tested with a Cox proportional hazard model, after controlling for risk factors or confounders. In addition, will evaluate EFS within the subpopulation of patients that started continued treatment.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Kaplan Meier methods will be used to estimate the median survivals (with a 90% confidence interval) as a function of time to response. The effects of time to response will also be tested with a Cox proportional hazard model, after controlling for risk factors or confounders. In addition, will evaluate OS within the subpopulation of patients that started continued treatment.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Kaplan Meier methods will be used to estimate the median survivals (with a 90% confidence interval) as a function of time to response. The effects of time to response will also be tested with a Cox proportional hazard model, after controlling for risk factors or confounders. In addition, will evaluate duration of response within the subpopulation of patients that started continued treatment.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
Phase 1 Trial of Iadademstat in Combination With Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Patients With Treatment Naive AML
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06802523
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Hematologic Diseases
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03728335
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Hematologic Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06492707
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Bone Marrow Diseases
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06317649
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Hematologic Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details