Chang-Gung University and Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan, 33302, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT06464640
The present study aims to evaluate the intervention effectiveness of the Online Interactive Podcast Program"Living with Type 1 Diabetes to Grown-Up"in patients with type 1 diabetes transitioning from adolescence to early adulthood.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified16 year–25 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Taoyuan, 33302, Taiwan
Individuals aged 16-25 with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) face significant transitional challenges in their lives, with an increased risk of worsening disease management. Addressing these challenges, an interactive podcast program,
"Living with Type 1 Diabetes to Grown-Up"; is being developed with a one-year grant from the National Science and Technology Council. This continued project will span three years, employing a mixed-method research design for evaluation. Participants will be recruited from pediatric endocrinology and genetics clinics and wards across two medical centers in Northern Taiwan. In line with recommendations from prior reviewers, the study will incorporate a two-phased approach: the first phase is a quantitative study, structured around transitional theory and self-regulation theory using PRIDE steps. It adopts a double-blinded, randomized controlled experimental method with data collector and sham treatment participants blinded. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (N=44) or the active control group (N=44). Comparative analyses will focus on variations in disease control, emotional disturbance, confidence in self-management, self-care behaviors, diabetes knowledge, interpersonal disturbance, and family conflict at baseline, and post-interventions of immediate, 3-month, and 6-month periods. In the subsequent qualitative phase, 15-20 cases from the experimental group will be selected for in-depth interviews to evaluate the impact of the " Living with Type 1 Diabetes to GrownUp " interactive podcast program.
The outcomes of this research are anticipated to contribute significantly to the clinical management and technological intervention strategies for T1D adolescents in their transitional phase to adulthood.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
# T1D patients with other concomitant metabolic diseases, chromosomal aberrations, major illnesses, and cognitive impairment will be excluded from this study.
The podcast content was designed based on the results of previous research.Subjects will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (N=44) or the comparison group (N=44). Comparative analyses will focus on variations in disease control, emotional disturbance,confidence in self-management, self-care behaviors, diabetes knowledge,interpersonal disturbance, and family conflict at baseline, and post-interventions of immediate, 3-month, and 6-month periods.
Participants in the active control group will use Ebook.According to the research results from the project leader's app effectiveness evaluation (Chiang, 2020-2022), the e-book did not show significant effects on blood sugar control, disease management confidence, self-care behaviors, disease-related knowledge, or interpersonal distress. Therefore, the active control group received a sham treatment in the form of an e-book. The research team extracted content from the CEO APP e-book, with an expert validity of 0.91, and reorganized it into an electronic health education manual titled "Transitioning from Adolescence to Early Adulthood: The Ins and Outs of Type 1 Diabetes."
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
HbA1c from baseline, 3month and 6 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
the percentage of self-monitored blood glucose levels within the optimal range of 70-180 mg/dL
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Number of events of each participant with blood sugar >200 mg/dl or" high" on glucometer, Ketoacidosis diagnosed
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Number of events of each participant with blood sugar <60 mg/dl or "low" on glucometer, Hypoglycemia diagnosed
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Change in Diabetes Distress Scale score over time.Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS): The original scale was developed by Polonsky et al. (2005). The Chinese version consists of 18 items across four subscales. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (no distress) to 4 (severely distressed), with higher scores indicating more severe emotional distress. Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability values of the DDS were 0.89 and 0.81, respectively (Liu et al., 2010).
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale (PDSMS):The original questionnaire was developed by Wallston et al. (2007). It consists of 8 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree),The translated questionnaire has content validity, Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability values of 0.75, 0.93, and 0.97, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Self-care Behavior Assessment Scale: This scale was developed by Wang (2010) to measure self-care behaviors of adolescents with T1D. A total of 39 items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not achieved at all) to 5 (completely achieved). The total score ranges from 39 to 195, with higher scores indicating better self-care behaviors. Cronbach's α and the content validity index (CVI) value based on content rating by experts are 0.87 and 0.92, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ): The original questionnaire was developed by Garcia et al. (2001). The Chinese version comprises 24 items that are answered "Yes," "No" or "I don't know"; 1 point is awarded for each correct answer. The total score ranges from 0 to 24 points.reliability and Cronbach's α values of 0.78 and 0.89, respectively Hu et al.(2013)
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
Analyze the score changes in the "Diabetes-Related Interpersonal Distress" subscale within the Diabetes Distress Scale (as previously mentioned in the Diabetes Distress Scale score ).
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6months
The Diabetes Family Conflict Scale-Revised (DFCS), revised by Hood et al. (2007), is used to assess family conflict and disagreements related to diabetes care in adolescents with T1D and their parents. The scale consists of 19 items and uses a 3-point scoring system: "Almost Never" scores 1 point, "Sometimes" scores 2 points, and "Almost Always" scores 3 points. Higher scores indicate more conflict. The DFCS has strong psychometric properties, with a Cronbach's α value of .95 for the adolescent version of the scale.
Trial opening soon.
Get NotifiedChang Gung University
Other
Efficacy of the Interactive Podcast Program "Living With Type 1 Diabetes to Grown-Up": A Two-arm Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07831798
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Toronto, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07829302
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Melbourne, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07325201
Acid-Base Imbalance, Acidosis
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07785037
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
View Trial Details