University Hospital North Norway
Tromsø, 9038, Norway
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06451588
Although biologic therapy have revolutionized the treatment of Spondyloarthrtitis (SpA), many patients do not experience complete relief of SpA related complaints.
It has been established that patients with SpA have an altered composition of microorganisms (microbiota) in the gut compared to healthy controls, and that this correlates to disease activity and respons to therapy.
The goal of this randomized double-blind study is to evaluate the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with axial SpA with a suboptimal effect of biologic therapy.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Can FMT reduce disease activity in axial SpA? * Can FMT alleviate pain and reduce fatigue in axial SpA? * Is the composition of microorganisms restored to normal in patients with SpA after a treatment with FMT?
Participants will receive a single treatment in the form of an enema with either donor FMT or placebo at baseline. The primary endpoint will be evaluated after 90 days, but efficacy and safety will be monitored from baseline until 365 days.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Tromsø, 9038, Norway
Location status: Recruiting
Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) and the spine.
The approach to treatment of axSpA is a combination of patient education, with a focus on exercise and lifestyle, and a medical treatment. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the first-line medical treatment, providing symptom relief for a large portion of the patients. For patients with inadequate response, or intolerance, to NSAIDs, biological (TNFi and IL17i) or targeted synthetic (JAKi) disease modifying drugs (b/ts-DMARDs) are considered a second-line treatment option and provide excellent efficacy for many patients. However, a substantial portion of the patients experience active disease despite this second-line therapy.
The cause of the disease is multifactorial, and both genetic and environmental factors contribute in the pathogenesis. Patients with axSpA have a higher prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) than the background population, i.e. Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. However, inflammation in the gut is also demonstrated in 50-70% of patients without symptoms of IBD, and this inflammation is believed to be of importance in the development of the disease.
The human gut microbiota is the collection of microbes in the intestines. The composition of the microbiota is the result of many factors and have evolved over time to form a mutually beneficial relationship to both humans and microorganisms. Normally there is a balance and a stability in this composition, but in many conditions an imbalance, termed dysbiosis, has been demonstrated. This is also the case in axSpA, and the extent of this dysbiosis also relates to disease activity and to response to therapy.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a method used to alter the microbiota composition by transferring microbes from a healthy individual to a recipient. In several conditions this has both proven the ability to alter the microbiota and to provide symptom relief , e.g. clostridium difficile infections, ulcerative colitis and irritable bowel syndrome.
In the Microspa study, we aim to evaluate whether fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) can induce clinical remission and symptom relief in patients with axial spondyloarthritis who have shown an inadequate response to biologic therapy.
Microspa 2 is a parallel trial that retains the overall design of the original study, with adjustments made to the eligibility criteria and primary and secondary endpoints. All other components-including outcome measures, sample size, randomization strategy, and statistical analysis plan-remain unchanged.
In Microspa 2, eligible participants include patients who are biologic-naïve or who have previously used biologic therapy but discontinued treatment. Patients currently receiving biologic therapy are excluded. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients in the donor FMT group compared to the autologous FMT group who initiate immunomodulatory treatment within 90 days following the intervention. An additional secondary endpoint is the proportion of patients initiating immunomodulatory treatment within 365 days post-intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Active FMT
The placebo treatment will be prepared based on the patients' fecal samples (autologous).
Time frame: 90 days
Proportion of patients that meet the criteria of Minimal Clinically Important Improvement in the donor FMT (dFMT) versus the autologous FMT (aFMT) group at day 90 after treatment (FMT - Fecal Microbiota Transplantation). Minimal Clinically Important Improvement is defined by a decrease of ≥1,1 in ASDAS-CRP (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score).
Time frame: Day 0-90 and day 91-365
The proportion of patients experiencing any adverse events from baseline util day 90 and day 365
Time frame: baseline, day 30, day 60 and day 90
Improvement of at least 20% in 3 out of four domains without worsening of 20% or more in the remaining domain. Change in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline, day 30, day 60 and day 90
Higher score indicates more active disease. Change in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline, day 30, day 60 and day 90
Higher score indicating more severe disease impact. Change in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline, day 30, day 60 and day 90
Patient's evaluation of disease impact. Higher score indicating worse disease. Change in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline, day 30, day 60 and day 90
Patient's evaluation of pain on av visual analogue scale. Higher score indicating worse pain.
Change in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 90
Higher score indicating greater impact of fatigue on daily life. Change in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 90
Change in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 90
Higher score indicating more widespread pain. Change in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 90
Indicating number of swollen and tender joints. Change in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 90
Indicating restricted mobility. Change in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 30, day 60, day 90, day 180, day 270 and day 365
Improvement of at least 40% in 3 out of four domains without worsening of 20% or more in the remaining domain.Long term change that includes the extended open labeled follow up in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 30, day 60, day 90, day 180, day 270 and day 365
Higher score indicates more active disease. Long term change that includes the extended open labeled follow up in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 30, day 60, day 90, day 180, day 270 and day 365
Higher score indicating more severe disease impact. Long term change that includes the extended open labeled follow up in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 30, day 60, day 90, day 180, day 270 and day 365
Patient's evaluation of disease impact. Higher score indicating worse disease. Long term change that includes the extended open labeled follow up in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 30, day 60, day 90, day 180, day 270 and day 365
Patient's assessment of spinal pain og visual scale. Higher score indicates more pain.
Long term change that includes the extended open labeled follow up in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 30, day 60, day 90, day 180, day 270 and day 365
Higher score indicating greater impact of fatigue on daily life. Long term change that includes the extended open labeled follow up in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 30, day 60, day 90, day 180, day 270 and day 365
Quality-of-life measure. Long term change that includes the extended open labeled follow up in the dFMT vs aFMT group from baseline
Time frame: baseline and day 90
Changes in taxonomy and function of the microbiome, the immune system, metabolome and gut epithelial barrier in participants with vs without treatment success to dFMT and aFMT
Time frame: baseline
Differences in baseline taxonomy and function of the microbiome, the immune system, metabolome and gut epithelial barrier in participants with vs without treatment success to dFMT and aFMT
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Gunnstein Bakland, MD PhD
CONTACT
Peter Johnsen, MD PhD
CONTACT
University Hospital of North Norway
Other
Donor Versus Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Axial Spondyloarthritis: a Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial
Acronym: MicroSpA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01808118
Ankylosis, Arthritis
View Trial DetailsNCT05647577
Ankylosis, Arthritis
Hellerup, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05031767
Ankylosis, Arthritis
Oslo, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT02552212
Ankylosis, Arthritis
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details