University of South Carolina Sport Science Lab
Columbia, South Carolina, 29208, United States
NCT Number: NCT06356181
This project aims to assess the effectiveness of using a Respiratory Muscle Training (RMT) device during high-intensity functional training (HIFT) to improve fitness and ventilatory parameters. Primary outcome measures include aerobic, anaerobic, and HIFT measures. Secondary measures include sleep, affect, and mood state questionnaires. Participants will be randomized into one of two groups: with the RMT device and without the RMT device.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Columbia, South Carolina, 29208, United States
This study assesses the impact of a ventilatory training device, similar to a sports mouth guard worn during exercise, on various performance outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare 6 weeks of training with the ventilatory training device to those without the training device.
Participants will:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Those in the intervention group will wear the respiratory training device for 3 days per week of high-intensity functional training over 6-weeks.
Those in the control group will train for 3 days per week of high-intensity functional training over 6-weeks.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Spirometry measures of forced vital capacity (FVC) (L), forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) (L), and the ratio of FEV1/FVC %
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Assessed via a cycle-ergometer based maximal graded exercise test with indirect calorimetry.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Assessed via a cycle-ergometer based maximal graded exercise test
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Assessed via a cycle-ergometer based maximal graded exercise test with indirect calorimetry.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Assessed via force plates
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Assessed via 30-second Wingate test.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Assessed via a high-intensity functional training circuit composed of rows, pushups, and squats
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Assessed via a cycle-ergometer based maximal graded exercise test with indirect calorimetry.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Body fat percentage, fat-free mass, and fat mass via air-displacement plethysmography.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, and 7
Assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 40. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, and 7
Assessed by the Profile of Mood States (POMS). The total mood is calculated by adding the negative subscales (tension, depression, fatigue, confusion, and anger) and subtracting the positive subscales (vigor, esteem-related affect). Minimum score of -36 and max score of 200. Lower scores for total mood disturbance are considered better.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, and 7
Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Min values of 0 and max of 50, higher scores indicate more positive moods and emotions.
Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, and 7
Biochemical responses to exercise. Blood lactate sampled pre and post exercise during the last training day of the week.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, and 7.
Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Min values of 0 and max of 50, higher scores indicate more negative moods and emotions with lower scores indicating less negative moods and emotions.
University of South Carolina
Other
High-Intensity Functional Training Adaptations With and Without Maximus Ventilatory Training Device
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07365865
Deficient Keratinized Mucosa, Healthy
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04849923
Healthy
Winterthur, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06744517
Behavior, Healthy
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05166096
Healthy
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial Details