Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036, Spain
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06220006
This randomised study will compare pulsed field ablation and cryoballoon ablation with respect to ablation lesion quality as assessed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at 3 months post-ablation. Patients scheduled for first-time AF ablation will be randomised in a 2:1 fashion to receive PVI-only, either by pulsed field ablation (Farapulse Pulsed Field Ablation System, Boston Scientific) or cryoballoon ablation (Medtronic Cryoballoon Ablation System).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036, Spain
Location status: Recruiting
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using catheter ablation has become a cornerstone in the treatment of AF and is considered the most effective therapy today. Catheter ablation has been mostly performed employing thermal energies, with radiofrequency and cryo-balloon ablation being the best validated most widely applied modalities. Despite substantial technological and procedural advances that have improved efficacy, efficiency and safety of AF ablation in recent years, long-term durability of ablation lesions is still not satisfactory, and rare but potentially life-threatening procedure-related complications like cardiac tamponade or atrio-esophageal fistula remain a concern. In addition, phrenic nerve palsy complicates a relevant proportion of procedures, particularly in cryo-ablation.
The novel non-thermal ablation method of pulsed field ablation holds great promise in that respect. Pulsed field ablation achieves permanent cell death through electroporation, which appears to provide a unique selectivity for cardiomyocytes and to spare surrounding tissues composed of other cell types, thus minimising the risk of collateral damage.This method has already been introduced into routine clinical practice and is established in many centers worldwide. A large number of studies have confirmed safety and efficacy of pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in the context of AF and found significant reductions in ablation times. However, the putative benefits regarding efficacy, efficiency and safety remain to be proven in randomised controlled trials.
Against this background, the investigators aim to perform a randomised clinical trial comparing pulsed field ablation with thermal cryo-balloon ablation with respect to efficacy, effectiveness and safety. Patients scheduled for first-time AF ablation will be randomised in a 2:1 fashion to receive PVI-only, either by pulsed field ablation (Farapulse Pulsed Field Ablation System, Boston Scientific) or cryoballoon ablation (Medtronic Cryoballoon Ablation System). The primary outcome of this trial will be ablation lesion quality as assessed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at 3 months post-ablation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Catheter ablation
Time frame: 3 months post-ablation
Complete late gadolinium enhancement encircling both pulmonarz vein pairs, with discontinuations adding up to less than 10% of the total length of the circumference
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months post-ablation
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months post-ablation
Freedom from atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter and AF
Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months
Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months
Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months
Time frame: 3 months post-ablation
Time frame: intra-procedural
(per-pulmonary vein pair analysis and per-patient analysis
Time frame: periprocedural and 12 months
Vascular access complications, pericardial effusion / tamponade, phrenic nerve paly (temporal or permanent), atrio-esophageal fistula, esophageal ulcer, pulmonary vein stenosis, systemic embolism, stroke, TIA, death, cardiovascular death
Interested in participating?
Request InfoHospital Clinic of Barcelona
Other
Acronym: PULSED-ICE-CMR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07428564
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Aalst, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07527299
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07429214
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Aalst, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07807423
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Avignon, France
View Trial Details