Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT06179888
This phase II trial compares iberdomide maintenance therapy to disease monitoring for improving survival in patients who have received idecabtagene vicleucel (a type of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell [CAR-T] therapy) for multiple myeloma. The usual approach after treatment with idecabtagene vicleucel is to monitor the multiple myeloma without giving myeloma medications. There is currently no medication approved specifically for use after idecabtagene vicleucel treatment. Upon administration, iberdomide modifies the immune system and activates immune cells called T-cells, which could enhance the effectiveness of idecabtagene vicleucel. Iberdomide may keep multiple myeloma under control for longer than the usual approach (disease monitoring) after idecabtagene vicleucel, and may help multiple myeloma patients live longer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
UCI Health - Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Ambulatory Care, Irvine, California, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To establish and confirm the safety and dose of iberdomide as maintenance after idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) CAR-T. (Safety run-in) II. To assess whether iberdomide maintenance therapy after idecabtagene vicleucel CAR-T cell therapy increases progression-free survival (PFS) relative to observation without additional therapy. (Randomized phase II)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To demonstrate anti-tumor activity, defined as conversion from non-minimal residual disease (MRD) complete response (CR)/stringent CR (sCR) status to MRD-negative CR/sCR, as well as improvement in PFS in the safety run-in cohort. (Safety run-in) II. To estimate the rate of conversion from MRD-positive at baseline to MRD-negative at any time point post-initiation of iberdomide maintenance or observation without additional therapy. (Key secondary objective; Randomized phase II) III. To estimate overall survival (OS) distribution post-initiation of iberdomide maintenance or observation without additional therapy. (Key secondary objective; Randomized phase II) IV. To estimate the minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rate at pre-registration and at one year post-initiation of iberdomide maintenance or observation without additional therapy. (Randomized phase II) V. To estimate rate of deepening hematological response among patients with measurable multiple myeloma (MM) post-initiation of iberdomide maintenance or observation without additional therapy. (Randomized phase II) VI. To evaluate the safety profile of iberdomide maintenance. (Randomized phase II) VII. To evaluate the peripheral blood immunophenotype before and during iberdomide maintenance or observation without additional therapy. (Randomized phase II) VIII. To evaluate persistence of CAR-T cells with iberdomide maintenance or observation without additional therapy. (Randomized phase II)
CORRELATIVE SCIENCE OBJECTIVES:
I. To estimate the minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rate at start of maintenance and at one year post-initiation of maintenance or observation.
II. To estimate the sustained MRD-negativity rate. III. To estimate the rate of conversion from MRD-positive to MRD-negative. (Key objective) IV. To evaluate the peripheral blood immunophenotype before and during maintenance therapy or observation.
V. To evaluate the persistence of CAR-T cells. VI. To evaluate B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) protein expression by immunohistochemistry on myeloma cells from patients that have relapsed/recurrent disease.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.
GROUP 1: Patients undergo disease monitoring at monthly clinic visits until disease progression. Patients also undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy throughout the trial, undergo collection of blood samples at screening and on study, and undergo positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and/or skeletal survey x-ray, CT, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at screening and then as clinically indicated.
GROUP 2: Patients receive iberdomide orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-21 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy throughout the trial, undergo collection of blood samples at screening and on study, and undergo PET/CT and/or skeletal survey x-ray, CT, or MRI at screening and then as clinically indicated.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up within 30 days, then every 3-6 months until 4 years following registration.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
PLUS, either:
Undergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
Undergo bone marrow aspiration
Undergo bone marrow biopsy
Other names: Biopsy of Bone Marrow, Biopsy, Bone Marrow
Undergo PET/CT and/or CT
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type, tomography
Given PO
Other names: CC 220, CC-220
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Undergo disease monitoring
Other names: medical monitoring, monitor
Undergo PET/CT
Other names: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron emission tomography (procedure), Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, PT
Undergo skeletal survey x-ray
Other names: Skeletal Survey
Time frame: The first 3 months of therapy
Time frame: From randomization to the time of progression and/or death, assessed up to 4 years
Final analyses will use log-rank test statistics to compare the PFS distributions between the treatment arms. Will also evaluate differences in PFS between the treatment arms using a stratified log-rank test. In addition, the methods of Kaplan and Meier will be used to graphically evaluate these distributions as well as to estimate the median PFS and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Further, will also estimate the 1- and 2-year PFS rates for each treatment arm along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Finally, Cox proportional hazards models will be used to evaluate the impact of treatment arm on PFS.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Adverse events will be collected and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 criteria. For CTCAE data, the maximum grade for each type of adverse will be recorded for each patient, and described using frequency tables. All-cause adverse events will be summarized as well as treatment-related adverse events, with particular focus on grade 3+ non-hematologic adverse events and grade 4+ hematologic events. Frequency tables will be reviewed to identify patterns. The overall adverse event severity will be compared between treatment arms using a chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test if the data in contingency table is sparse).
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Will be summarized.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Will be summarized.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Will be summarized.
Time frame: From randomization until death from any cause, assessed up to 4 years
The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate OS for each treatment arm, with 1- and 2-year OS estimates and OS medians along with their 95% confidence intervals. For the comparison of the treatment arms, will use a one-sided log-rank test to compare the OS distributions between treatment arms. Will also evaluate the influence of arm on OS using stratified and unstratified multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Will calculate these rates by treatment arm along with corresponding 95% binomial confidence intervals. Logistic regression models may also be used to assess differences in the ability to deepen or convert to a response between treatment arms. Minimal residual disease (MRD) will be assessed as an aspect of response assessment.
Time frame: After randomization, up to 4 years
Will calculate these rates by treatment arm along with corresponding 95% binomial confidence intervals. Logistic regression models may also be used to assess differences in the ability to deepen or convert to a response between treatment arms. MRD will be assessed as an aspect of response assessment.
Time frame: At start of maintenance and at one year post-initiation of maintenance or observation
Will evaluate and identify patients in MRD-negative complete response (CR)/stringent CR (sCR) versus patients who are not in MRD-negative CR/sCR, both from pre-registration (before start of maintenance iberdomide vs. active monitoring) and at the follow-up time points. These will be summarized as proportions within each of the randomization arms at each time point. Assuming that the number of MRD-negative CR/sCR patients is binomially distributed, will calculate corresponding 95% binomial confidence intervals for these rates as well.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Will evaluate and identify patients in MRD-negative CR/sCR versus patients who are not in MRD-negative CR/sCR, both from pre-registration (before start of maintenance iberdomide vs. active monitoring) and at the follow-up time points. These will be summarized as proportions within each of the randomization arms at each time point. Assuming that the number of MRD-negative CR/sCR patients is binomially distributed, will calculate corresponding 95% binomial confidence intervals for these rates as well.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Will assess the proportion of patients who had detectable disease at randomization who were able to achieve MRD-negative CR/sCR status after treatment with iberdomide.
Time frame: Before and during maintenance therapy or observation
Continuous measures of immune cell subsets will be evaluated using side-by-side boxplots to show differences between treatment arms, and two-sample t-tests will be used to assess quantitative differences in the mean levels of these measures between arms.
Time frame: At cycle 12
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Will evaluate protein expression by immunohistochemistry on myeloma cells from patients that have relapsed/recurrent disease. Will summarize the BCMA expression status at baseline and evaluate how these associate with PFS using Cox regression models, to evaluate how treatment arm may modify this influence. Changes in this status can be captured both graphically as well as a time-dependent covariate in the model for PFS. In a similar manner, will also evaluate expression intensity. This will be done in those with BCMA expression present, but also across all patients. Differences in changes in these expression intensity levels before versus after study registration monitoring will be compared between treatment arms. Changes in this status will also be evaluated and how these may differ between patients treated with maintenance iberdomide vs. active monitoring using logistic generalized estimating equation models.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
Randomized Phase 2 Study of Iberdomide Maintenance Therapy Following Idecabtagene Vicleucel CAR-T in Multiple Myeloma Patients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06876142
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07102212
Alzheimer Disease, Anxiety Disorders
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06106945
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04898790
Blood Protein Disorders, Bone Marrow Diseases
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial Details